{"id":30009,"date":"2014-03-25T03:22:45","date_gmt":"2014-03-25T07:22:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aicanada.ca\/fr\/cpv-issue\/2011-volume-55-book-2\/"},"modified":"2014-03-25T03:23:45","modified_gmt":"2014-03-24T23:23:45","slug":"2011-volume-55-tome-2","status":"publish","type":"issue","link":"https:\/\/www.aicanada.ca\/fr\/cpv-issue\/2011-volume-55-tome-2\/","title":{"rendered":"2011 &#8211; Volume 55 &#8211; Tome 2"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Canadian Property<\/p>\n<p>VALUATION \u00c9VALUATION<br \/>\n Immobili\u00e8re au Canada<\/p>\n<p>VOLUME  55  |  BOOK 2  |  2011THE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE APPRAISAL INSTITUTE OF CANADA<\/p>\n<p>REAL VALUE EXPERTS  |  EXPERTS EN \u00c9VALUATION<\/p>\n<p>Standards for  24-hour turnarounds<br \/>\nProfessional collaboration<\/p>\n<p>The PrOfessIONALIsm<br \/>\nof AIC\u2019s Real Value Experts<\/p>\n<p>PM<br \/>\n #<\/p>\n<p>40<br \/>\n00<\/p>\n<p>82<br \/>\n49<\/p>\n<p>  R<br \/>\net<\/p>\n<p>ur<br \/>\nn <\/p>\n<p>un<br \/>\nde<\/p>\n<p>liv<br \/>\ner<\/p>\n<p>ab<br \/>\nle<\/p>\n<p> C<br \/>\nan<\/p>\n<p>ad<br \/>\nia<\/p>\n<p>n<br \/>\nAd<\/p>\n<p>dr<br \/>\nes<\/p>\n<p>se<br \/>\ns <\/p>\n<p>to<br \/>\n:  <\/p>\n<p>Ap<br \/>\npr<\/p>\n<p>ai<br \/>\nsa<\/p>\n<p>l I<br \/>\nns<\/p>\n<p>tit<br \/>\nut<\/p>\n<p>e<br \/>\nof<\/p>\n<p> C<br \/>\nan<\/p>\n<p>ad<br \/>\na,<\/p>\n<p> 4<br \/>\n03<\/p>\n<p>-2<br \/>\n00<\/p>\n<p> C<br \/>\nat<\/p>\n<p>he<br \/>\nrin<\/p>\n<p>e<br \/>\nSt<\/p>\n<p>.,<br \/>\nO<\/p>\n<p>tta<br \/>\nw<\/p>\n<p>a,<br \/>\n O<\/p>\n<p>N<br \/>\n K<\/p>\n<p>2P<br \/>\n 2<\/p>\n<p>K9<br \/>\n. E<\/p>\n<p>m<br \/>\nai<\/p>\n<p>l:<br \/>\nin<\/p>\n<p>fo<br \/>\n@<\/p>\n<p>ai<br \/>\nca<\/p>\n<p>na<br \/>\nda<\/p>\n<p>.c<br \/>\na<\/p>\n<p>mailto:info@aicanada.ca<br \/>\nmailto:info@aicanada.ca<br \/>\nmailto:info@aicanada.ca<\/p>\n<p>Innovative Technology &#8211; 30 Years and Counting &#8211; ACI has<br \/>\nbeen a pioneer, providing innovative tools that save appraisers time and<br \/>\nmoney. Look to ACI to provide the foremost solution in the industry.<br \/>\nVisit AppraisersChoice.com for the latest news and information. <\/p>\n<p>Benefi cial Partnerships &#8211; ACI features solid integration with<br \/>\nsketch tools, location maps, fl ood data, and tools that streamline the<br \/>\nappraisal report writing process.  It is through these partnerships<br \/>\nthat ACI appraisers have many options and why ACI is \u201dThe<br \/>\nAppraiser\u2019s Choice.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>Premier Service &#8211; Toll-free technical support,<br \/>\nLIVE chat operators, and over 140 online videos on<br \/>\nAppraisersChoice.com provides ACI appraisers<br \/>\nwith multiple support channels. <\/p>\n<p>Best Value &#8211; Hands-down, ACI offers the<br \/>\nmost comprehensive real estate appraisal<br \/>\nsoftware package available in the industry.  We<br \/>\ninvite you to experience ACI\u2019s industry-leading<br \/>\nappraisal technology and service.<\/p>\n<p>YOU KNOW VALUE&#8230;<br \/>\n              CRAL ADDS VALUE <\/p>\n<p>ACI is a division of Verisk Analytics (NASDAQ: VRSK), a leading provider of risk assessment solutions to professionals in insurance, healthcare, mortgage<br \/>\nlending, government, risk management, and human resources. Verisk Analytics includes the holdings of Insurance Services Offi ce, Inc. (ISO) and its<br \/>\nsubsidiaries, which provide essential solutions to the insurance, mortgage lending, and healthcare markets. For more information, visit www.verisk.com.<\/p>\n<p>Good work is dignifi ed.<br \/>\nThroughout our history, ACI<br \/>\nhas forged partnerships with<br \/>\nvaluation professionals across<br \/>\nthe nation. <\/p>\n<p>Working with appraisers drives<br \/>\nthe passion behind the people<br \/>\nand makes it easy to produce<br \/>\ntechnology that is smarter, faster<br \/>\nand better.  <\/p>\n<p>We look forward to the road<br \/>\nahead in 2011 and in fostering<br \/>\nthe relationships that have made<br \/>\nus who we are.<\/p>\n<p>YOU ARE AN APPRAISER<\/p>\n<p>Save time and effort <\/p>\n<p>with CRAL\u2019s  Market <\/p>\n<p>Conditions eService. <\/p>\n<p>Works with most MLS <\/p>\n<p>providers.<\/p>\n<p>Comps Import Transfer<br \/>\nMLS Data Directly<\/p>\n<p>Worldwide ERC\u00ae Summary<br \/>\nAppraisal Report<\/p>\n<p>The Worldwide <\/p>\n<p>ERC\u00ae Summary <\/p>\n<p>Appraisal Report <\/p>\n<p>is now available in <\/p>\n<p>CRAL2010\u2122.<\/p>\n<p>Easily defi ne <\/p>\n<p>shaded portions <\/p>\n<p>that represent your <\/p>\n<p>subjects\u2019 Market <\/p>\n<p>Area or Boundary.<\/p>\n<p>Neighborhood Boundaries<br \/>\nin MapPoint<\/p>\n<p>CRAL2010\u2122 Highlights<br \/>\n \u25aa New Feature! MapPoint Neighborhood <\/p>\n<p>Boundaries Visually defi ne your subject<br \/>\nproperty\u2019s market area and save for future use.<\/p>\n<p> \u25aa New Forms! Worldwide ERC\u00ae<br \/>\nSummary Appraisal Report  Now<br \/>\navailable for relocation experts.<\/p>\n<p> \u25aa New Functions! Import MLS data directly into<br \/>\nyour reports with CRAL\u2019s Market Conditions eService<\/p>\n<p> \u25aa Appraisal Forms Library<br \/>\n \u25aa Order Tracking<br \/>\n \u25aa Photo Management<br \/>\n \u25aa Comps Database<br \/>\n \u25aa ACI Sketch\u2122  <\/p>\n<p> \u25aa Digital Signature (One)<br \/>\n \u25aa ChoiceCredits\u2122 (250)<br \/>\n \u25aa Free PDF Creator<br \/>\n \u25aa Premier Plus Service (One Year)<br \/>\n \u25aa Concierge Service<\/p>\n<p>CALL ACI SALES TODAY!<\/p>\n<p>The Appraiser\u2019s Choice\u2122 <\/p>\n<p>CRAL2010\u2122<\/p>\n<p>Form300  01\/10<\/p>\n<p>t 800-234-8727 f 386-246-3811AppraisersChoice.com<\/p>\n<p>THE APPRAISER\u2019S CHOICE\u2122<\/p>\n<p>THE APPRAISER\u2019S CHOICE\u2122<\/p>\n<p>THE APPRAISER\u2019S CHOICE\u2122<\/p>\n<p>THE APPRAISER\u2019S CHOICE\u2122<\/p>\n<p>THE APPRAISER\u2019S CHOICE\u2122<\/p>\n<p>THE APPRAISER\u2019S CHOICE\u2122<\/p>\n<p>THE APPRAISER\u2019S CHOICE\u2122<\/p>\n<p>THE APPRAISER\u2019S CHOICE\u2122<\/p>\n<p>THE APPRAISER\u2019S CHOICE\u2122<\/p>\n<p>CRAL2010\u2122<\/p>\n<p>C<br \/>\nR<br \/>\nA<br \/>\nL<br \/>\n2010<\/p>\n<p>\u2122<\/p>\n<p>80<br \/>\n0<br \/>\n-234-8727<\/p>\n<p>A<br \/>\np<br \/>\npraisersC<\/p>\n<p>ho<br \/>\nice.co<\/p>\n<p>m<\/p>\n<p>Printed on Recycled Paper<\/p>\n<p>NOW<br \/>\nONLY<\/p>\n<p>*Limited Time Offer. Payable in US Dollars.<\/p>\n<p> ACI\u2014The Appraiser\u2019s Choice\u2122.  <\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/www.verisk.com<br \/>\nhttp:\/\/www.appraiserchoice.com<\/p>\n<p>Innovative Technology &#8211; 30 Years and Counting &#8211; ACI has<br \/>\nbeen a pioneer, providing innovative tools that save appraisers time and<br \/>\nmoney. Look to ACI to provide the foremost solution in the industry.<br \/>\nVisit AppraisersChoice.com for the latest news and information. <\/p>\n<p>Benefi cial Partnerships &#8211; ACI features solid integration with<br \/>\nsketch tools, location maps, fl ood data, and tools that streamline the<br \/>\nappraisal report writing process.  It is through these partnerships<br \/>\nthat ACI appraisers have many options and why ACI is \u201dThe<br \/>\nAppraiser\u2019s Choice.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>Premier Service &#8211; Toll-free technical support,<br \/>\nLIVE chat operators, and over 140 online videos on<br \/>\nAppraisersChoice.com provides ACI appraisers<br \/>\nwith multiple support channels. <\/p>\n<p>Best Value &#8211; Hands-down, ACI offers the<br \/>\nmost comprehensive real estate appraisal<br \/>\nsoftware package available in the industry.  We<br \/>\ninvite you to experience ACI\u2019s industry-leading<br \/>\nappraisal technology and service.<\/p>\n<p>YOU KNOW VALUE&#8230;<br \/>\n              CRAL ADDS VALUE <\/p>\n<p>ACI is a division of Verisk Analytics (NASDAQ: VRSK), a leading provider of risk assessment solutions to professionals in insurance, healthcare, mortgage<br \/>\nlending, government, risk management, and human resources. Verisk Analytics includes the holdings of Insurance Services Offi ce, Inc. (ISO) and its<br \/>\nsubsidiaries, which provide essential solutions to the insurance, mortgage lending, and healthcare markets. For more information, visit www.verisk.com.<\/p>\n<p>Good work is dignifi ed.<br \/>\nThroughout our history, ACI<br \/>\nhas forged partnerships with<br \/>\nvaluation professionals across<br \/>\nthe nation. <\/p>\n<p>Working with appraisers drives<br \/>\nthe passion behind the people<br \/>\nand makes it easy to produce<br \/>\ntechnology that is smarter, faster<br \/>\nand better.  <\/p>\n<p>We look forward to the road<br \/>\nahead in 2011 and in fostering<br \/>\nthe relationships that have made<br \/>\nus who we are.<\/p>\n<p>YOU ARE AN APPRAISER<\/p>\n<p>Save time and effort <\/p>\n<p>with CRAL\u2019s  Market <\/p>\n<p>Conditions eService. <\/p>\n<p>Works with most MLS <\/p>\n<p>providers.<\/p>\n<p>Comps Import Transfer<br \/>\nMLS Data Directly<\/p>\n<p>Worldwide ERC\u00ae Summary<br \/>\nAppraisal Report<\/p>\n<p>The Worldwide <\/p>\n<p>ERC\u00ae Summary <\/p>\n<p>Appraisal Report <\/p>\n<p>is now available in <\/p>\n<p>CRAL2010\u2122.<\/p>\n<p>Easily defi ne <\/p>\n<p>shaded portions <\/p>\n<p>that represent your <\/p>\n<p>subjects\u2019 Market <\/p>\n<p>Area or Boundary.<\/p>\n<p>Neighborhood Boundaries<br \/>\nin MapPoint<\/p>\n<p>CRAL2010\u2122 Highlights<br \/>\n \u25aa New Feature! MapPoint Neighborhood <\/p>\n<p>Boundaries Visually defi ne your subject<br \/>\nproperty\u2019s market area and save for future use.<\/p>\n<p> \u25aa New Forms! Worldwide ERC\u00ae<br \/>\nSummary Appraisal Report  Now<br \/>\navailable for relocation experts.<\/p>\n<p> \u25aa New Functions! Import MLS data directly into<br \/>\nyour reports with CRAL\u2019s Market Conditions eService<\/p>\n<p> \u25aa Appraisal Forms Library<br \/>\n \u25aa Order Tracking<br \/>\n \u25aa Photo Management<br \/>\n \u25aa Comps Database<br \/>\n \u25aa ACI Sketch\u2122  <\/p>\n<p> \u25aa Digital Signature (One)<br \/>\n \u25aa ChoiceCredits\u2122 (250)<br \/>\n \u25aa Free PDF Creator<br \/>\n \u25aa Premier Plus Service (One Year)<br \/>\n \u25aa Concierge Service<\/p>\n<p>CALL ACI SALES TODAY!<\/p>\n<p>The Appraiser\u2019s Choice\u2122 <\/p>\n<p>CRAL2010\u2122<\/p>\n<p>Form300  01\/10<\/p>\n<p>t 800-234-8727 f 386-246-3811AppraisersChoice.com<\/p>\n<p>THE APPRAISER\u2019S CHOICE\u2122<\/p>\n<p>THE APPRAISER\u2019S CHOICE\u2122<\/p>\n<p>THE APPRAISER\u2019S CHOICE\u2122<\/p>\n<p>THE APPRAISER\u2019S CHOICE\u2122<\/p>\n<p>THE APPRAISER\u2019S CHOICE\u2122<\/p>\n<p>THE APPRAISER\u2019S CHOICE\u2122<\/p>\n<p>THE APPRAISER\u2019S CHOICE\u2122<\/p>\n<p>THE APPRAISER\u2019S CHOICE\u2122<\/p>\n<p>THE APPRAISER\u2019S CHOICE\u2122<\/p>\n<p>CRAL2010\u2122<\/p>\n<p>C<br \/>\nR<br \/>\nA<br \/>\nL<br \/>\n2010<\/p>\n<p>\u2122<\/p>\n<p>80<br \/>\n0<br \/>\n-234-8727<\/p>\n<p>A<br \/>\np<br \/>\npraisersC<\/p>\n<p>ho<br \/>\nice.co<\/p>\n<p>m<\/p>\n<p>Printed on Recycled Paper<\/p>\n<p>NOW<br \/>\nONLY<\/p>\n<p>*Limited Time Offer. Payable in US Dollars.<\/p>\n<p> ACI\u2014The Appraiser\u2019s Choice\u2122.  <\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/www.appraiserchoice.com<\/p>\n<p>America\u2019s Most Hassle-Free Appraisal Software<br \/>\nIs Now Canada\u2019s Most Hassle-Free Appraisal Software<\/p>\n<p>www.BradfordSoftware.com<br \/>\nVisit our website for Introductory Pricing Specials<\/p>\n<p>800-622-8727<\/p>\n<p>Selected by Centract Settlement Services as<br \/>\nthe only approved appraisal software for report<br \/>\ndelivery, ClickFORMS is now being made<br \/>\navailable to all appraisers in Canada.<\/p>\n<p>ClickFORMS is the software most recognized for being<br \/>\nhassle-free. With intuitive \u201cDrag and Drop\u201d simplicity<br \/>\nyou don\u2019t need special training. In fact you\u2019ll probably<br \/>\ncreate your first report without even reading the<br \/>\nmanual. And it does all the little things you would<br \/>\nexpect from quality software. Like providing all your<br \/>\nforms in English and French with a spell checker that<br \/>\nalso works in English and French. The sketcher is<br \/>\nbuilt-in, but it\u2019ll also work with the one you currently<br \/>\nuse. ClickFORMS is software that works the way you<br \/>\nwould expect software to work &#8211; hassle free!<\/p>\n<p>If you\u2019re looking for a better way, an easier way to<br \/>\nproduce appraisal reports and want to save some<br \/>\nmoney, switch to ClickFORMS today. Centract<br \/>\nSettlement Services did.<\/p>\n<p>Simplicity at its Best<br \/>\nProductivity at its Highest<\/p>\n<p>only $349<br \/>\nClickFROMS is a trademark of Bradford Technologies, Inc.; Other brand and product names are trademrks of their respective owners.<\/p>\n<p>or<br \/>\n$30\/mo<\/p>\n<p>Canadian_Winter_2011:Canadian Property Valuation Magazine  1\/27\/2011  1:38 PM  Page 1<\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/www.BradfordSoftware.com<br \/>\nhttp:\/\/www.bradfordsoftware.com<\/p>\n<p>Canadian Property Valuation Volume 55 | book 2 | 2011 \u00c9valuation Immobili\u00e8re au Canada 5click here to return to table 0f contents<\/p>\n<p>403-200 Catherine Street,<br \/>\nOttawa, ON  K2P 2K9 <\/p>\n<p>Phone: (613) 234-6533 Fax: (613) 234-7197<br \/>\nWeb site: www.aicanada.ca<\/p>\n<p>Contact us at: info@aicanada.ca <\/p>\n<p>Board of Directors<br \/>\nConseil d\u2019administration<\/p>\n<p>President \u2013 Pr\u00e9sidente<br \/>\nGrant Uba, AACI (ON)<\/p>\n<p>President Elect \u2013 Pr\u00e9sident d\u00e9sign\u00e9<br \/>\nMichael Mendela, AACI (ON)<\/p>\n<p>Immediate Past-president \u2013<br \/>\nPr\u00e9sident sortant immediate<\/p>\n<p>Sheila Young, AACI, Fellow <\/p>\n<p>Vice-Presidents \u2013 Vice-pr\u00e9sidents<br \/>\nKimberly Maber, AACI (SK) <\/p>\n<p>Dan Wilson, AACI (BC)<\/p>\n<p>Directors \u2013 Directeurs<br \/>\nGreg Bennett, AACI (NL)<\/p>\n<p> Alfred Mullally, AACI (NS)<br \/>\nLouis Poirier, AACI (QC)<br \/>\n David Shum, AACI (AB)<br \/>\nScott Wilson, AACI (PE)<\/p>\n<p>David Babineau, AACI, Fellow (NB)<br \/>\n Lorne Mikulik, AACI (MB)<\/p>\n<p>Dan Brewer, AACI (ON)<br \/>\nJohn Peebles, AACI (BC)<\/p>\n<p>Chief Executive Officer<br \/>\nGeorges Lozano, MPA, Ottawa<\/p>\n<p>Director of Marketing &#038; Communications<br \/>\nJoanne Charlebois, Ottawa<\/p>\n<p>Communications Officer<br \/>\nMary-Jane Erickson, Ottawa<\/p>\n<p>Managing Editor \u2013<br \/>\nR\u00e9dacteur administratif<\/p>\n<p>Craig Kelman, Winnipeg<\/p>\n<p>Assistant Editor \u2013<br \/>\nR\u00e9dacteur en chef adjoint<\/p>\n<p>Cheryl Parisien, Winnipeg<\/p>\n<p>Editorial Board<br \/>\nAIC would like to thank the following  <\/p>\n<p>individuals for their assistance and support:<br \/>\nSheila Young, AACI, Fellow \u2013 Chair<\/p>\n<p>John Peebles, AACI<br \/>\nAndr\u00e9 Beaudoin, CRA<br \/>\nDavid Lopatka, AACI<\/p>\n<p>Rob Grycko, CRA<br \/>\nJane Londerville, B.Sc., M.B.A.,AACI (Hon)<br \/>\nAssociate Professor, University of Guelph<\/p>\n<p>Published by the<br \/>\nVolume 55, book 2, 2011<\/p>\n<p>Contents<\/p>\n<p>Printed on paper certified by the Forest Stewardship<br \/>\nCouncil\u00ae (FSC\u00ae). This magazine is printed with <\/p>\n<p>vegetable oil-based inks. Please do your part for<br \/>\nthe environment by reusing and recycling.<\/p>\n<p>Publication Mails Agreement #40008249.<br \/>\nReturn undeliverable Canadian addresses to: Appraisal Institute of Canada,<br \/>\n403-200 Catherine St., Ottawa, ON  K2P 2K9. Email: info@aicanada.ca<\/p>\n<p>The articles printed in this issue represent authors\u2019 opinions only and are not neces-<br \/>\nsarily endorsed by the APPRAISAL INSTITUTE OF CANADA. Copyright 2011 by the<br \/>\nAPPRAISAL INSTITUTE OF CANADA. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or<br \/>\nin part without written permission is strictly prohibited. Subscription, $40.00 per<br \/>\nyear. Printed in Canada. Les articles imprim\u00e9s dans ce num\u00e9ro ne rep\u00e9sentent que<br \/>\nl\u2019opinion de leur auteur respectif, mais ne sont pas n\u00e9ces\u2013sairement endoss\u00e9s par<br \/>\nL\u2019INSTITUT CANADIEN DES \u00c9vALUATEURS. Tous droits reserv\u00e9s 2011 par L\u2019INSTITUT<br \/>\nCANADIEN DES \u00c9vALUATEURS. La reproduction totale ou partielle sous quelque<br \/>\nform que se soit sans authorisation \u00e9crite est absolument interdite. Abonnement<br \/>\n$40.00 par ann\u00e9e. Imprim\u00e9 au Canada.<br \/>\n* The Appraisal Institute of Canada reserves the right to reject advertising<br \/>\nthat it deems to be inappropriate.<br \/>\n** The publisher and the Appraisal Institute of Canada cannot be held liable for<br \/>\nany material used or claims made in advertising included in this publication.<br \/>\nIndexed in the Canadian Business Index and available on-line in the Canadian<br \/>\nBusiness &#038; Current Af fairs database.<\/p>\n<p>ISSN 0827-2697<\/p>\n<p>Publication management, design and production by:<\/p>\n<p>3rd Floor \u2013 2020 Portage Avenue<br \/>\nWinnipeg, MB r3J 0K4<\/p>\n<p>Phone: 866-985-9780 \u2022 Fax: 866-985-9799<br \/>\nE-mail: info@kelman.ca \u2022 Web: www.kelman.ca<\/p>\n<p>Design\/Layout: Theresa Kurjewicz<br \/>\nAdvertising Manager: Kris Fillion<\/p>\n<p>Advertising Co-ordinator: Lauren Campbell<\/p>\n<p>6  The professionalism of AIC\u2019s<br \/>\nREAL VALUE EXPERTS<\/p>\n<p>8 Le professionnalisme des<br \/>\nv\u00e9ritables experts en \u00e9valuationn<br \/>\nde l\u2019ic\u00e9<\/p>\n<p>10 Re-structuring is in the air<\/p>\n<p>12 La restructuration est dans l\u2019air<\/p>\n<p>15 Peer reviewers find the<br \/>\nexperience a win-win for all<\/p>\n<p>20  Listening nourishes success<\/p>\n<p>21 Blurring the line between<br \/>\ncontractors and employees<\/p>\n<p>22 The Professional Liability<br \/>\nInsurance Program \u2013 Part III<\/p>\n<p>24 Ad hoc committee focuses on<br \/>\nCandidates<\/p>\n<p>25 What is the AIC candidacy<br \/>\nprocess?<\/p>\n<p>27 Appraisal<br \/>\nstandards<br \/>\nfor 24-hour<br \/>\nturnarounds<\/p>\n<p>28 Professional<br \/>\ncollaboration<\/p>\n<p>30 Assuming a role of advocate <\/p>\n<p>31 Consumer sense and sensibility<\/p>\n<p>32  Google Earth \u2013 an invaluable<br \/>\ntool for valuation professionals<\/p>\n<p>34 Candidates \u2013 staying on track<br \/>\nwith a course per year<\/p>\n<p>35 Spotlight on Continuing<br \/>\nProfessional Development<\/p>\n<p>38 Designations\/Candidates\/<br \/>\nStudents<\/p>\n<p>39 Announcing The Homburg<br \/>\nInstitute Canada and Homburg<br \/>\nAcademy Switzerland<\/p>\n<p>40 The contributory value of high-<br \/>\nend swimming pool, cabana and<br \/>\nlandscaping<\/p>\n<p>44 News<\/p>\n<p>46 Calendar of Events<\/p>\n<p>America\u2019s Most Hassle-Free Appraisal Software<br \/>\nIs Now Canada\u2019s Most Hassle-Free Appraisal Software<\/p>\n<p>www.BradfordSoftware.com<br \/>\nVisit our website for Introductory Pricing Specials<\/p>\n<p>800-622-8727<\/p>\n<p>Selected by Centract Settlement Services as<br \/>\nthe only approved appraisal software for report<br \/>\ndelivery, ClickFORMS is now being made<br \/>\navailable to all appraisers in Canada.<\/p>\n<p>ClickFORMS is the software most recognized for being<br \/>\nhassle-free. With intuitive \u201cDrag and Drop\u201d simplicity<br \/>\nyou don\u2019t need special training. In fact you\u2019ll probably<br \/>\ncreate your first report without even reading the<br \/>\nmanual. And it does all the little things you would<br \/>\nexpect from quality software. Like providing all your<br \/>\nforms in English and French with a spell checker that<br \/>\nalso works in English and French. The sketcher is<br \/>\nbuilt-in, but it\u2019ll also work with the one you currently<br \/>\nuse. ClickFORMS is software that works the way you<br \/>\nwould expect software to work &#8211; hassle free!<\/p>\n<p>If you\u2019re looking for a better way, an easier way to<br \/>\nproduce appraisal reports and want to save some<br \/>\nmoney, switch to ClickFORMS today. Centract<br \/>\nSettlement Services did.<\/p>\n<p>Simplicity at its Best<br \/>\nProductivity at its Highest<\/p>\n<p>only $349<br \/>\nClickFROMS is a trademark of Bradford Technologies, Inc.; Other brand and product names are trademrks of their respective owners.<\/p>\n<p>or<br \/>\n$30\/mo<\/p>\n<p>Canadian_Winter_2011:Canadian Property Valuation Magazine  1\/27\/2011  1:38 PM  Page 1<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"fPd69TvK2w\"><p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.aicanada.ca\/\">Home<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" class=\"oembed-iframe\"  class=\"wp-embedded-content\" sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" style=\"position: absolute; clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);\" title=\"&#8220;Home&#8221; &#8212; Appraisal Institute of Canada\" src=\"https:\/\/www.aicanada.ca\/embed\/#?secret=gIkeg4VH7f#?secret=fPd69TvK2w\" data-secret=\"fPd69TvK2w\" width=\"500\" height=\"282\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\"><\/iframe><br \/>\nmailto:info@aicanada.ca<br \/>\nmailto:info@aicanada.ca<br \/>\nmailto:info@kelman.ca<br \/>\nhttp:\/\/www.kelman.ca<\/p>\n<p>Canadian Property Valuation Volume 55 | book 2 | 2011 \u00c9valuation Immobili\u00e8re au Canada6 click here to return to table 0f contents<\/p>\n<p>President\u2019s message<\/p>\n<p>Grant Uba, AACI<br \/>\nAIC President<\/p>\n<p>The professionalism of<br \/>\naIC\u2019s Real Value eXPeRTs<\/p>\n<p>I n 1938, a group of like-minded individuals founded the Appraisal Institute of Canada (AIC). The AIC incorporated in April 1960<br \/>\nwith purposes and objectives etched in the Let-<br \/>\nters Patent. Among others, these included:<br \/>\n (a) to create and maintain an association of <\/p>\n<p>appraisers and, for that purpose, to estab-<br \/>\nlish, promote, and advance the standards of<br \/>\nappraisal and valuation of property of all kinds;<br \/>\nand <\/p>\n<p> (b) to establish, promote and advance the<br \/>\ninterests of those engaged in the appraisal and<br \/>\nvaluation of property of all kinds.<\/p>\n<p>The AIC was incorporated in a simpler time, when<br \/>\nthe AACI designation was the sole designation,<br \/>\nthe media for communications were the type-<br \/>\nwriter and personal meetings, appraisers were<br \/>\nassisted by secretaries, and carbon paper was <\/p>\n<p>used to create multiple copies. Since then, the<br \/>\nAIC has evolved to include:<\/p>\n<p>\u2022\t 10\taffiliated\tassociations,\twith\tan\taffiliate<br \/>\nin each province, and members having<br \/>\nmembership\tin\tthe\tAIC\tand\tin\tthe\taffiliated<br \/>\nassociation for the province in which they<br \/>\nreside;<\/p>\n<p>\u2022\t the\t1970\timplementation\tof\tthe\tCRA\tas\ta<br \/>\nsecond designation, which at the time was<br \/>\nan interim designation and later became<br \/>\nrecognized as a permanent designation;<\/p>\n<p>\u2022\t Candidate\tmembers\taspiring\tto\tearn\tan\tAIC<br \/>\ndesignation; and<\/p>\n<p>\u2022\t a\tmembers\u2019\tinsurance\tprogram\tthat\trec-<br \/>\nognizes the difference between members<br \/>\nengaged in fee for service in the private<br \/>\nsector and members employed in the public<br \/>\nsector.<\/p>\n<p>This evolution of the AIC has been accompanied<br \/>\nby unprecedented and continuous technologi-<br \/>\ncal changes in the media of communications.<br \/>\nThis has included computerization; decreasing<br \/>\npersonal contact as a result of voice mail, email<br \/>\nand, now, social media; secretaries replaced with<br \/>\nappraisers gaining more expertise in word pro-<br \/>\ncessing software; and print options that include<br \/>\ncolour peripherals and photocopiers for paper<br \/>\nand electronic copies.<\/p>\n<p>Throughout these changes, the purposes and<br \/>\nobjectives of the AIC have remained constant: to<br \/>\ncreate and maintain an association of appraisers<br \/>\nto establish and advance standards of appraisal<br \/>\nand to promote and advance the interests of<br \/>\nthose engaged in appraisal and valuation. As it<br \/>\nhas always done, the AIC continues to ramp up<br \/>\nthe promotion of the valuation profession, the <\/p>\n<p> \u201cSuccess rests on<br \/>\nour individual and <\/p>\n<p>collective shoulders,<br \/>\nas we must BELIEVE<br \/>\nthat we are indeed <\/p>\n<p>the best REAL VALUE<br \/>\nEXPERTS, regardless<br \/>\nof where we work, <\/p>\n<p>and that we can take<br \/>\nup the challenge of <\/p>\n<p>being a professional.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Canadian Property Valuation Volume 55 | book 2 | 2011 \u00c9valuation Immobili\u00e8re au Canada 7click here to return to table 0f contents<\/p>\n<p>professional AACI and CRA designations, and<br \/>\nInstitute members as REAL vALUE EXPERTS. The<br \/>\nAIC has been talking the talk in promoting its<br \/>\nREAL vALUE EXPERTS, but it cannot walk the talk<br \/>\nbecause it is the organization of professionals, not<br \/>\nthe profession. Whether working in the private<br \/>\nor public sector, individually or collectively, the<br \/>\nmembers are the working professionals.<\/p>\n<p>In my opinion, a professional has certain<br \/>\nvalues and characteristics. A professional is one<br \/>\nwho is:<\/p>\n<p>\u2022\t honest\tand\tethical,<br \/>\n\u2022\t competent,<br \/>\n\u2022\t forward\tthinking,<br \/>\n\u2022\t prudent\tand\tdiligent\tin\trisk\ttaking,<br \/>\n\u2022\t able\tto\tlearn\tfrom\tfailure,\tand<br \/>\n\u2022\t selective\tin\tthe\twork\tthat\the\tor\tshe\tdoes.<\/p>\n<p>The appraisal profession that we know is under<br \/>\nstress \u2013 stress from automated valuation<br \/>\nmodels, appraisal management companies,<br \/>\ncompeting organizations, and non-traditional<br \/>\nvaluation professions creeping into valuation. In<br \/>\nresponse to these stressors, the AIC can talk the<br \/>\ntalk in promoting its members as REAL vALUE<br \/>\nEXPERTS who are the professionals best able<br \/>\nto provide professional valuation and advisory<br \/>\nservices in Canada. However, success rests on <\/p>\n<p>our individual and collective shoulders, as we<br \/>\nmust BELIEvE that we are indeed the best REAL<br \/>\nvALUE EXPERTS, regardless of where we work,<br \/>\nand that we can take up the challenge of being a<br \/>\nprofessional.<\/p>\n<p>Yes, there are stressors in the valuation<br \/>\nprofession, but only the working valuation<br \/>\nprofessionals can walk the talk in responding<br \/>\nto these stressors. To possess the values and<br \/>\ncharacteristics of a professional, AIC\u2019s valuation<br \/>\nprofessionals today and tomorrow need to be<br \/>\nforward thinking; prudent and diligent in risk<br \/>\ntaking; learners from failure; and selective in<br \/>\nthe work we undertake to manage the stressors<br \/>\nfacing the profession. <\/p>\n<p>Individually and collectively, we can sit back,<br \/>\ndo nothing, let the future unfold and suffer the<br \/>\nconsequences. If we do not BELIEvE that we are<br \/>\nindeed REAL vALUE EXPERTS, walking the talk as<br \/>\nthe professionals best able to provide valuation<br \/>\nand advisory services, then other individuals<br \/>\nand other valuation organizations will rise to the<br \/>\ntop. However, if our AIC\u2019s REAL vALUE EXPERTS<br \/>\nembrace change, think to the future, take<br \/>\nprudent and diligent risks, learn from failure, and<br \/>\nbe selective in the work we do, we will meet the<br \/>\nchallenges and enhance our professionalism and <\/p>\n<p>\u201cFellow members are peers and colleagues, not competitors, and mentoring is<br \/>\ngrowing the AIC and the profession, not spawning competition.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>our reputation as Canada\u2019s professionals best able<br \/>\nto provide valuation and advisory services.<\/p>\n<p>In the spirit of professionalism, we need to<br \/>\nbe in this together. I often hear AIC members say<br \/>\nthat their fellow members are competitors. The<br \/>\nApplied Experience Program requires designated<br \/>\nmembers to accept the challenge of mentoring<br \/>\na Candidate in his or her pursuit of an AIC<br \/>\ndesignation. While many designated members<br \/>\naccept the challenge, unfortunately, there are<br \/>\nmembers who refuse to mentor Candidates<br \/>\nbecause they believe they are training their future<br \/>\ncompetition. <\/p>\n<p>While the AIC is a different organization today<br \/>\nthan it was in 1960, we should be mindful of the<br \/>\n1960 purposes and objectives of maintaining<br \/>\nan association of members and promoting<br \/>\nand advancing the interests of our members.<br \/>\nI respectfully submit that fellow members are<br \/>\npeers and colleagues, not competitors, and<br \/>\nmentoring is growing the AIC and the profession,<br \/>\nnot spawning competition. I am confident that<br \/>\nthe AIC\u2019s REAL vALUE EXPERTS, as peers and<br \/>\ncolleagues working together, can meet the<br \/>\nchallenges in the marketplace. In so doing, we<br \/>\ncan advance the AIC and the interests of our<br \/>\nmembers. <\/p>\n<p>www.aicanada.ca<br \/>\nViSit uS at:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"fPd69TvK2w\"><p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.aicanada.ca\/\">Home<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" class=\"oembed-iframe\"  class=\"wp-embedded-content\" sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" style=\"position: absolute; clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);\" title=\"&#8220;Home&#8221; &#8212; Appraisal Institute of Canada\" src=\"https:\/\/www.aicanada.ca\/embed\/#?secret=gIkeg4VH7f#?secret=fPd69TvK2w\" data-secret=\"fPd69TvK2w\" width=\"500\" height=\"282\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>Canadian Property Valuation Volume 55 | book 2 | 2011 \u00c9valuation Immobili\u00e8re au Canada8 click here to return to table 0f contents<\/p>\n<p>Grant Uba, AACI<br \/>\nPr\u00e9sident de l\u2019ICE<\/p>\n<p>Le professionnalisme<br \/>\ndes V\u00e9RITables eXPeRTs<br \/>\nen \u00e9ValuaTIon de l\u2019IC\u00e9<\/p>\n<p>message du pr\u00e9sident<\/p>\n<p>En 1938, un groupe de personnes aux vues similaires ont fond\u00e9 l\u2019Institut canadien des \u00e9valuateurs (IC\u00c9). En<br \/>\navril 1960, l\u2019organisation fut incorpor\u00e9e en<br \/>\ncompagnie canadienne. Entre autres choses,<br \/>\nles lettres-patentes de l\u2019ICE stipulent les buts<br \/>\net objectifs suivants :<br \/>\n (a) cr\u00e9er, maintenir et soutenir une <\/p>\n<p>association d\u2019\u00e9valuateurs et, \u00e0 cette fin,<br \/>\n\u00e9tablir, promouvoir et veiller \u00e0 l\u2019avancement<br \/>\ndes normes d\u2019\u00e9valuation de propri\u00e9t\u00e9s de<br \/>\ntoutes sortes; <\/p>\n<p> (b) \u00e9tablir, promouvoir et faire valoir les<br \/>\nint\u00e9r\u00eats de ceux qui se livrent \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9valuation<br \/>\nde propri\u00e9t\u00e9s de toutes sortes\u2026.<br \/>\n(traduction libre)<\/p>\n<p>\u00c0 l\u2019\u00e9poque o\u00f9 l\u2019IC\u00c9 fut incorpor\u00e9, les temps<br \/>\n\u00e9taient beaucoup plus simples. Le seul titre<br \/>\ndisponible \u00e9tait celui d\u2019AACI, et les outils de<br \/>\ncommunication \u00e9taient limit\u00e9s \u00e0 une machine \u00e0<br \/>\n\u00e9crire et \u00e0 des r\u00e9unions. Les \u00e9valuateurs avaient<br \/>\ndes secr\u00e9taires et le papier carbone servait \u00e0 cr\u00e9er<br \/>\nde multiples copies. Depuis, l\u2019IC\u00c9 a \u00e9volu\u00e9 pour : <\/p>\n<p>\u2022\t inclure\tdix\tassociations\taffili\u00e9es\trepr\u00e9sent-<br \/>\nant chaque province et dont les mem-<br \/>\nbres sont inscrits aupr\u00e8s de l\u2019IC\u00c9 et de<br \/>\nl\u2019association\taffili\u00e9e\tde\tleur\tprovince\tde<br \/>\nr\u00e9sidence; <\/p>\n<p>\u2022\t adopter\tun\tdeuxi\u00e8me\ttitre,\tsoit\tcelui\tde<br \/>\nCRA\ten\t1970\tet\tqui,\t\u00e0\tl\u2019\u00e9poque,\tdevait\tservir<br \/>\nde titre int\u00e9rimaire avant d\u2019\u00eatre reconnu<br \/>\nult\u00e9rieurement comme titre permanent; <\/p>\n<p>\u2022\t inclure\tles\tmembres\tstagiaires\td\u00e9sireux<br \/>\nd\u2019obtenir\tun\ttitre\tofficiel\tde\tl\u2019IC\u00c9;<\/p>\n<p>\u2022\t inclure\tun\tprogramme\td\u2019assurance\tpour<br \/>\nles membres qui reconna\u00eet la diff\u00e9rence<br \/>\nentre les membres salari\u00e9s et \u00e0 honoraires<br \/>\nemploy\u00e9s dans les secteurs priv\u00e9s et public.<\/p>\n<p>Cette \u00e9volution de l\u2019IC\u00c9 a \u00e9t\u00e9 accompag-<br \/>\nn\u00e9e d\u2019une r\u00e9volution technologique sans<br \/>\npr\u00e9c\u00e9dent dans les outils de communication,<br \/>\npassant par l\u2019ordinateur et la r\u00e9duction des<br \/>\ncontacts personnels via les bo\u00eetes vocales, le<br \/>\ncourriel et maintenant les m\u00e9dias sociaux.<br \/>\nLes secr\u00e9taires ont \u00e9t\u00e9 remplac\u00e9es par des<br \/>\n\u00e9valuateurs plus vers\u00e9s dans l\u2019utilisation des<br \/>\nlogiciels de traitement de texte et les options<br \/>\nd\u2019impression incluent des p\u00e9riph\u00e9riques et <\/p>\n<p>\u00ab Je sugg\u00e8re<br \/>\nrespectueusement<br \/>\nque les membres<br \/>\nsont nos pairs et <\/p>\n<p>nos coll\u00e8gues et non<br \/>\ndes comp\u00e9titeurs <\/p>\n<p>et, aussi, que le<br \/>\nmentorat contribue \u00e0<br \/>\nla croissance de l\u2019IC\u00c9<br \/>\net de la profession et<br \/>\nnon \u00e0 la formation<br \/>\nde comp\u00e9titeurs. \u00bb<\/p>\n<p>Canadian Property Valuation Volume 55 | book 2 | 2011 \u00c9valuation Immobili\u00e8re au Canada 9click here to return to table 0f contents<\/p>\n<p>photocopieuses couleur pour les copies papier<br \/>\net les copies \u00e9lectroniques.<\/p>\n<p>En d\u00e9pit de tous ces changements, les buts<br \/>\net objectifs de l\u2019IC\u00c9, soit de cr\u00e9er, maintenir<br \/>\net soutenir une association d\u2019\u00e9valuateurs pour<br \/>\n\u00e9tablir et parfaire les normes d\u2019\u00e9valuation<br \/>\net promouvoir et faire valoir les int\u00e9r\u00eats de<br \/>\nceux qui se livrent \u00e0 des travaux d\u2019\u00e9valuation<br \/>\nsont demeur\u00e9s constants. L\u2019IC\u00c9 a toujours<br \/>\nd\u00e9ploy\u00e9 tous les efforts pour promouvoir la<br \/>\nprofession d\u2019\u00e9valuateurs, les titres AACI et<br \/>\nCRA et ses membres comme v\u00c9RITABLES<br \/>\nEXPERTS EN \u00c9vALUATION, et continue de le<br \/>\nfaire. L\u2019IC\u00c9 a beaucoup pr\u00each\u00e9 au moment de<br \/>\nfaire la promotion de ses v\u00c9RITABLES EXPERTS<br \/>\nEN \u00c9vALUATION mais ne peut pr\u00eacher par<br \/>\nl\u2019exemple puisque l\u2019IC\u00c9 est une organisation de<br \/>\nprofessionnels et non la profession en tant que<br \/>\ntelle. Les membres, qu\u2019ils travaillent dans les<br \/>\nsecteurs priv\u00e9 ou public, individuellement ou<br \/>\ncollectivement, sont des travailleurs profes-<br \/>\nsionnels. <\/p>\n<p>Je suis d\u2019avis qu\u2019un professionnel poss\u00e8de<br \/>\ncertaines valeurs et caract\u00e9ristiques. Un<br \/>\nprofessionnel est une personne qui\u00a0:<\/p>\n<p>\u2022\t est\thonn\u00eate\tet\tfait\tpreuve\td\u2019\u00e9thique;<br \/>\n\u2022\t est\tcomp\u00e9tente;<br \/>\n\u2022\t fait\tpreuve\tde\tr\u00e9flexion\tprospective;<br \/>\n\u2022\t est\tprudente\tet\tfait\tpreuve\tde\tdiligence\t<\/p>\n<p>raisonnable dans les risques qu\u2019elle prend;<br \/>\n\u2022\t apprend\tde\tses\t\u00e9checs;<br \/>\n\u2022\t est\ts\u00e9lective\tdans\tle\ttravail\tqu\u2019elle\t <\/p>\n<p>accomplit.<br \/>\nLa profession d\u2019\u00e9valuateur telle que nous la<br \/>\nconnaissons subit un stress certain \u2013 un stress<br \/>\ndes mod\u00e8les automatis\u00e9s d\u2019\u00e9valuation, des <\/p>\n<p>compagnies de gestion en \u00e9valuation, des<br \/>\norganisations concurrentes, et de la profession<br \/>\nnon traditionnelle d\u2019estimateur. En r\u00e9ponse \u00e0<br \/>\nces sources de stress, l\u2019IC\u00c9 peut faire la promo-<br \/>\ntion de ses membres comme v\u00c9RITABLES<br \/>\nEXPERTS EN \u00c9vALUATION comme \u00e9tant les<br \/>\nprofessionnels les plus en mesure de fournir<br \/>\ndes services en \u00e9valuation et en consultation<br \/>\nau Canada. Toutefois, le succ\u00e8s repose sur nos<br \/>\n\u00e9paules individuelles et collectives puisque<br \/>\nnous devons CROIRE que nous sommes effec-<br \/>\ntivement des EXPERTS EN \u00c9vALUATION, peu<br \/>\nimporte le travail que nous faisons, et que nous<br \/>\nsommes en mesure de relever le d\u00e9fi associ\u00e9 au<br \/>\nfait d\u2019\u00eatre un travailleur professionnel. <\/p>\n<p>Effectivement, il existe des facteurs de<br \/>\nstress dans la profession d\u2019\u00e9valuateur, mais<br \/>\nseuls les professionnels de l\u2019\u00e9valuation peuvent<br \/>\ny r\u00e9agir en pr\u00eachant par l\u2019exemple. Puisant \u00e0<br \/>\nm\u00eame les valeurs et les caract\u00e9ristiques d\u2019un<br \/>\nprofessionnel, les professionnels de l\u2019\u00e9valuation<br \/>\nd\u2019aujourd\u2019hui et de demain r\u00e9agiront au stress<br \/>\nen faisant preuve de r\u00e9flexion prospective, de<br \/>\nprudence et de diligence lorsqu\u2019ils prennent<br \/>\ndes risques, apprendront par l\u2019\u00e9chec et pren-<br \/>\ndront le temps d\u2019\u00eatre s\u00e9lectifs dans le travail<br \/>\nqu\u2019ils accomplissent. Individuellement et col-<br \/>\nlectivement, il est possible de ne rien faire et<br \/>\nde nous retrouver tout simplement \u00e0 la merci<br \/>\nde l\u2019avenir et d\u2019en subir les cons\u00e9quences.  Si<br \/>\nnous ne CROYONS pas que nous sommes de<br \/>\nv\u00c9RITABLES EXPERTS EN \u00c9vALUATION qui<br \/>\npr\u00eachent par l\u2019exemple en offrant les meil-<br \/>\nleurs services d\u2019\u00e9valuation et de consultation,<br \/>\nd\u2019autres professionnels et d\u2019autres organismes<br \/>\nqui \u0153uvrent dans le domaine le feront \u00e0 notre <\/p>\n<p>place. Cependant, si les v\u00c9RITABLES EXPERTS<br \/>\nEN \u00c9vALUATION de l\u2019IC\u00c9 s\u2019adaptent au change-<br \/>\nment, pensent de fa\u00e7on prospective, prennent<br \/>\ndes risques de fa\u00e7on prudente et diligente,<br \/>\napprennent par l\u2019\u00e9chec et qu\u2019ils sont s\u00e9lectifs<br \/>\ndans le travail qu\u2019ils accomplissent, ils seront<br \/>\nen mesure de relever les d\u00e9fis, d\u2019am\u00e9liorer leur<br \/>\nprofessionnalisme et leur r\u00e9putation comme<br \/>\n\u00e9tant les professionnels canadiens le plus<br \/>\naptes \u00e0 offrir des services d\u2019\u00e9valuation et de<br \/>\nconsultation.<\/p>\n<p>Dans l\u2019esprit du professionnalisme, la<br \/>\ncollaboration est importante. Souvent,<br \/>\nj\u2019entends les membres de l\u2019IC\u00c9 dire que leurs<br \/>\ncoll\u00e8gues sont des concurrents. Le programme<br \/>\nd\u2019exp\u00e9rience appliqu\u00e9e requiert que les mem-<br \/>\nbres accr\u00e9dit\u00e9s acceptent le d\u00e9fi du mentorat<br \/>\net qu\u2019ils aident les stagiaires dans l\u2019atteinte<br \/>\nd\u2019un titre professionnel de l\u2019IC\u00c9. Bien que<br \/>\nplusieurs membres accr\u00e9dit\u00e9s rel\u00e8vent ce d\u00e9fi,<br \/>\nd\u2019autres refusent parce qu\u2019ils sont d\u2019avis qu\u2019ils<br \/>\ncontribuent \u00e0 former de futurs comp\u00e9titeurs.<br \/>\nAlors que l\u2019IC\u00c9 a \u00e9volu\u00e9 depuis 1960, nous<br \/>\ndevons nous rappeler les buts et objectifs de<br \/>\nmaintenir une association de membres et de<br \/>\npromouvoir et de faire valoir leurs int\u00e9r\u00eats. Je<br \/>\nsugg\u00e8re respectueusement que les membres<br \/>\nsont nos pairs et nos coll\u00e8gues et non des<br \/>\ncomp\u00e9titeurs et, aussi, que le mentorat con-<br \/>\ntribue \u00e0 la croissance de l\u2019IC\u00c9 et de la profes-<br \/>\nsion et non \u00e0 la formation de comp\u00e9titeurs.<br \/>\nJ\u2019ai confiance que la collaboration entre les<br \/>\nv\u00c9RITABLES EXPERTS EN \u00c9vALUATON DE L\u2019IC\u00c9<br \/>\npermettra de relever les d\u00e9fis sur le march\u00e9 et<br \/>\nce faisant, contribuera \u00e0 faire valoir les int\u00e9r\u00eats<br \/>\n\u00e0 la fois de l\u2019IC\u00c9 et de ses membres.  <\/p>\n<p>\u00ab Toutefois, le succ\u00e8s repose sur nos \u00e9paules individuelles et collectives<br \/>\npuisque nous devons CROIRE que nous sommes effectivement des EXPERTS EN<br \/>\n\u00c9VALUATION, peu importe le travail que nous faisons, et que nous sommes en <\/p>\n<p>mesure de relever le d\u00e9fi associ\u00e9 au fait d\u2019\u00eatre un travailleur professionnel. \u00bb<\/p>\n<p>Canadian Property Valuation Volume 55 | book 2 | 2011 \u00c9valuation Immobili\u00e8re au Canada10 click here to return to table 0f contents<\/p>\n<p>Georges Lozano, MPA<br \/>\nAIC\tChief\tExecutive\tOfficer<\/p>\n<p>CEO RePoRT<\/p>\n<p>Re-structuring  is in the air<\/p>\n<p>Springtime is a time of rebirth, renewal and rebuilding. Change is in the air all around. At the time<br \/>\nof writing, Canadians are getting ready to<br \/>\nelect a new government and, with it, the<br \/>\npromise of further change. Associations too<br \/>\nare facing a constantly changing environment<br \/>\nthat challenges both volunteers and staff to <\/p>\n<p>regularly assess the impact of these changes<br \/>\nand develop appropriate responses to ensure<br \/>\nthat their organizations and members are well<br \/>\npositioned to adapt and thrive. Planning is<br \/>\nmore important than ever if organizations are<br \/>\nto cope with all of the turbulence occasioned<br \/>\nby the rapid change without losing site of<br \/>\ntheir goals and objectives.  <\/p>\n<p>Professional associations are facing<br \/>\ndaunting challenges in the years ahead, as<br \/>\nthey try to maintain relevancy and re-position<br \/>\nthemselves to the changing needs of the<br \/>\nmarketplace for professional services. In<br \/>\nparticular, the real estate market has seen<br \/>\nsignificant changes in recent years that are<br \/>\ndriven by information technology, but also by<br \/>\ncompetitive pressures that are transforming the<br \/>\nway in which professional services are being<br \/>\ndelivered. As a result, professional real estate<br \/>\norganizations everywhere are engaging in<br \/>\ncomprehensive planning exercises and resetting<br \/>\ntheir compasses to new directions and futures.<\/p>\n<p>Recently, I attended a strategic planning<br \/>\nsession of the Canadian Real Estate Association<br \/>\nat which some 450 members deliberated on<br \/>\nthe future of their profession using an approach<br \/>\nknown as scenario planning. This involves<br \/>\nlooking five or 10 years out into the future<br \/>\nand envisioning possible outcomes. Planners<br \/>\nthen decide on which outcome will benefit the<br \/>\norganization best and then work to develop a<br \/>\nroadmap to get there.<\/p>\n<p>Real estate agency is changing rapidly<br \/>\nand realtors are finding that they need to<br \/>\nre-examine the value added they bring to the<br \/>\nconsumer. Years ago, the data that realtors had<br \/>\naccess to were a key part of the value added.<br \/>\nToday, this is not enough. Information about<br \/>\nproperties is widely available to buyers and<br \/>\nsellers, and realtors need to provide different<br \/>\nand enhanced services to meet client needs. <\/p>\n<p>Does this sound familiar? It should,<br \/>\nas data used to figure largely in the value<br \/>\nproposition that appraisers brought to clients.<br \/>\nWhat has changed? Data are ubiquitous and<br \/>\na commodity. Moreover, appraisers face a <\/p>\n<p>\u201cProfessional real estate organizations<br \/>\neverywhere are engaging in comprehensive <\/p>\n<p>planning exercises and resetting their compasses<br \/>\nto new directions and futures.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Canadian Property Valuation Volume 55 | book 2 | 2011 \u00c9valuation Immobili\u00e8re au Canada 11click here to return to table 0f contents<\/p>\n<p>number of competing services including<br \/>\nAvMs and other risk management tools that<br \/>\nsubstitute for appraisal work.<\/p>\n<p>There is consolidation in the industry and<br \/>\nappraisal management companies loom large<br \/>\naround the world. In some European countries,<br \/>\nvirtually all residential appraisal is handled by<br \/>\nAMCs or related firms that employ appraisers.<br \/>\nTo judge by what is happening in other parts<br \/>\nof the world, it may be that the days of the<br \/>\nindividual residential appraiser working alone<br \/>\nare disappearing.<\/p>\n<p>Changes are happening in the real estate<br \/>\nmarket south of the border too and, as a result,<br \/>\nthe Appraisal Institute has been conducting<br \/>\nits own strategic planning with the view<br \/>\nof restructuring itself and its membership.<br \/>\nPresident Grant Uba and I had the opportunity<br \/>\nto attend and speak at one of their meetings a<br \/>\nfew months ago and it became clear that the<br \/>\nissues that challenge the profession in Canada<br \/>\nare not very different than those impacting our<br \/>\nUSA colleagues.<\/p>\n<p>The Appraisal Institute\u2019s new strategic<br \/>\ndirection has been set and they have made it<br \/>\nclear that, in order to succeed in the future,<br \/>\nthe AI brand must distinguish itself from other<br \/>\nappraisal designations by its high quality<br \/>\nstandards. Being recognized as a professional<br \/>\nassociation rather than a trade association<br \/>\nis one of the main goals that the Appraisal<br \/>\nInstitute has identified. Further, they have<br \/>\nembraced core competencies that will be the<br \/>\ncornerstone of their designations.<\/p>\n<p>The Appraisal Institute of Canada has<br \/>\nnot been idle with respect to planning for<br \/>\nthe future. Starting at the beginning of this<br \/>\nmillennium, the Institute implemented a<br \/>\nrestructuring program driven by a bold new<br \/>\nstrategic plan which stated that:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe members of our Institute will be<br \/>\nprofessionals who are recognized as having<br \/>\nexpertise and integrity to: provide a broad range<br \/>\nof services related to the principles of value in<br \/>\nreal estate; and lead projects, initiatives and<br \/>\norganizations related to property; and provide <\/p>\n<p>support, strategic advice and decisions regarding<br \/>\nreal estate and related property.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>This plan has been the Institute\u2019s roadmap<br \/>\nover the past 10 years and the strategic initia-<br \/>\ntives that were undertaken during the period<br \/>\nderive from this plan. A major thrust took place<br \/>\nin 2004 with the launch of New Horizons,<br \/>\nwhich established a process to move towards<br \/>\nachievement of the objectives stated in the<br \/>\nstrategic plan. As a result, the Institute focused<br \/>\non increasing the professionalism of its mem-<br \/>\nbers by raising its quality standards with more<br \/>\nrigorous admission requirements, a<br \/>\ntriple E (education, experience, and exami-<br \/>\nnation) designation process, an enhanced<br \/>\nprofessional practice process, and an expanded<br \/>\ncontinuing professional development program. <\/p>\n<p>Strategic planning of one form or another<br \/>\nhas been an important part of the AIC Board\u2019s<br \/>\nactivities on an annual basis and has helped<br \/>\nAIC to stay focused on its goals and make<br \/>\nthe changes necessary to achieve them. This<br \/>\nprocess is ongoing. Currently, the AIC\u2019s Strategic<br \/>\nPlanning Committee is reviewing and revising<br \/>\nthe Appraisal Institute of Canada Strategic Plan<br \/>\nto ensure that it is current and meets not only<br \/>\ntoday\u2019s needs, but tomorrow\u2019s as well. <\/p>\n<p>Where do we need to go you might<br \/>\nask? I would suggest that the AIC needs to<br \/>\nfinish the job that it started over 10 years<br \/>\nago. The repositioning of the Institute and<br \/>\nits membership as first-tier, highly qualified,<br \/>\nmultidisciplinary real property professionals is a<br \/>\nwork in progress that should not be abandoned.<\/p>\n<p>The Institute needs to take a good, hard look<br \/>\nat where the market for professional valuation<br \/>\nservices is going, not only in Canada, but<br \/>\nworldwide, and ensure that Appraisal Institute<br \/>\nof Canada members will be ready to fully meet<br \/>\nthe needs of the marketplace for real property<br \/>\nvaluation and related advisory services. The<br \/>\nInstitute must act as the eyes and ears of the<br \/>\nprofession and advise its members as to how<br \/>\nthey can best protect themselves from the<br \/>\nnegative impacts and capitalize on many new<br \/>\nopportunities as they present themselves. <\/p>\n<p>The AIC must also ensure that its structure is<br \/>\nsound\tand\tthat\tit\tis\tsufficiently\tagile\tto\tdeal\twith<br \/>\nrapid change in a timely manner. In this respect,<br \/>\nthe governance of the Institute needs to be taken<br \/>\ninto consideration, as it is critically important to<br \/>\nthe smooth functioning of AIC. Now would be a<br \/>\ngood time to begin this exercise, given that the<br \/>\nproclamation of the new non-profit legislation<br \/>\n(the Canada Not-for-profit Corporations Act) will<br \/>\nrequire that all non-profit associations revise<br \/>\nand file new bylaws in the very near future. It<br \/>\nis a good time to begin thinking outside the<br \/>\nbox and looking at innovative ways of doing<br \/>\nthings to ensure that the AIC will maintain its<br \/>\nleadership position long into the future and<br \/>\nnotwithstanding the many challenges that it will<br \/>\nface in the years ahead.<\/p>\n<p>In this respect, it is more important than<br \/>\never for AIC members to voice their views<br \/>\non the future of the profession and their<br \/>\nexpectations of the Institute. The AIC leadership<br \/>\nneeds to hear from all members \u2013 designated<br \/>\nand Candidates, fee and non-fee, from both<br \/>\nthe private public sectors. Member feedback is<br \/>\nvitally important to the Institute\u2019s directors in<br \/>\norder for them to obtain a balanced assessment<br \/>\nof the issues, problems, and solutions<br \/>\nidentified. Only by engaging in an open,<br \/>\nconstructive debate will the Institute and its<br \/>\nmembership arrive at enlightened realizations,<br \/>\nand sound decisions. It is said that there is<br \/>\nno time like the present to get things done.<br \/>\nSpringtime makes this aphorism especially<br \/>\nappropriate. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt is more important<br \/>\nthan ever for AIC <\/p>\n<p>members to voice their<br \/>\nviews on the future of <\/p>\n<p>the profession and their<br \/>\nexpectations of the <\/p>\n<p>Institute.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Canadian Property Valuation Volume 55 | book 2 | 2011 \u00c9valuation Immobili\u00e8re au Canada12 click here to return to table 0f contents<\/p>\n<p>RaPPoRT du Chef de la direction<\/p>\n<p>Georges Lozano, MPA<br \/>\nChef de la direction<\/p>\n<p>La restructuration<br \/>\nest dans l\u2019air<\/p>\n<p>Le printemps est un temps de renais-sance, de renouveau et de reconstruc-tion. Tout, autour de nous, respire le<br \/>\nchangement. Au moment o\u00f9 j\u2019\u00e9cris ces lignes,<br \/>\nles Canadiens se pr\u00e9parent \u00e0 \u00e9lire un nouveau<br \/>\ngouvernement, et, avec cette \u00e9lection, vient la<br \/>\npromesse d\u2019autres changements. Les associa-<br \/>\ntions \u00e9galement doivent faire face \u00e0 un envi-<br \/>\nronnement en constante \u00e9volution qui met tant<br \/>\nles b\u00e9n\u00e9voles que les membres du personnel au<br \/>\nd\u00e9fi de devoir \u00e9valuer r\u00e9guli\u00e8rement les r\u00e9percus-<br \/>\nsions des changements et d\u2019y r\u00e9agir de fa\u00e7on<br \/>\nappropri\u00e9e pour assurer que leurs organisations<br \/>\net leurs membres sont en mesure de s\u2019y adapter<br \/>\net de poursuivre leur travail. La planification<br \/>\nest plus importante que jamais si les organisa-<br \/>\ntions veulent r\u00e9agir \u00e0 la f\u00e9brilit\u00e9 g\u00e9n\u00e9r\u00e9e par ce<br \/>\nchangement continuel sans perdre de vue leurs<br \/>\nbuts et leurs objectifs. <\/p>\n<p>Au cours des prochaines ann\u00e9es, les associa-<br \/>\ntions professionnelles devront relever de s\u00e9rieux<br \/>\nd\u00e9fis pour rester viables et se repositionner au<br \/>\nregard des besoins changeants du march\u00e9 en<br \/>\nce qui a trait aux services professionnels. Le<br \/>\nmarch\u00e9 immobilier, entre autres, a v\u00e9cu des<br \/>\nchangements profonds au cours des derni\u00e8res<br \/>\nann\u00e9es, changements amen\u00e9s par la technologie<br \/>\nde l\u2019information d\u2019une part, mais aussi par les<br \/>\npressions de la comp\u00e9titivit\u00e9, qui transforment le<br \/>\nmode de prestation des services professionnels. <\/p>\n<p>C\u2019est pourquoi toutes les organisations profes-<br \/>\nsionnelles du domaine de l\u2019immobilier entrepren-<br \/>\nnent d\u2019importantes d\u00e9marches de planification et<br \/>\norientent leurs boussoles vers d\u2019autres directions<br \/>\net d\u2019autres avenues.<\/p>\n<p>J\u2019ai assist\u00e9 r\u00e9cemment \u00e0 une s\u00e9ance de<br \/>\nplanification strat\u00e9gique de l\u2019Association cana-<br \/>\ndienne de l\u2019immeuble lors de laquelle quelque<br \/>\n450 membres ont discut\u00e9 de l\u2019avenir de leur<br \/>\nprofession, dans le cadre d\u2019une d\u00e9marche connue<br \/>\nsous le nom de planification par sc\u00e9nario. Cette<br \/>\nd\u00e9marche fait appel \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9laboration de projections<br \/>\nde cinq \u00e0 dix ans dans le futur et \u00e0 la d\u00e9termina-<br \/>\ntion de r\u00e9sultats potentiels. Les planificateurs<br \/>\nd\u00e9cident ensuite du r\u00e9sultat qui profiterait le plus<br \/>\n\u00e0 l\u2019organisation, puis ils \u00e9tablissent la marche \u00e0<br \/>\nsuivre pour y parvenir.<\/p>\n<p>Le monde des agences immobili\u00e8res est<br \/>\nen pleine mutation et les courtiers immobiliers<br \/>\ns\u2019aper\u00e7oivent qu\u2019ils doivent red\u00e9finir la valeur<br \/>\najout\u00e9e qu\u2019ils apportent au consommateur.<br \/>\nAuparavant, les donn\u00e9es auxquelles les courtiers<br \/>\nimmobiliers avaient acc\u00e8s formaient les ingr\u00e9-<br \/>\ndients cl\u00e9s de la valeur ajout\u00e9e. Aujourd\u2019hui,<br \/>\nce n\u2019est plus assez. Les acheteurs et les ven-<br \/>\ndeurs peuvent facilement avoir acc\u00e8s \u00e0 toute<br \/>\nl\u2019information sur les propri\u00e9t\u00e9s, et les courtiers<br \/>\nimmobiliers doivent pouvoir offrir des services<br \/>\ndiff\u00e9rents et am\u00e9lior\u00e9s pour r\u00e9pondre aux besoins<br \/>\ndu client. <\/p>\n<p>Est-ce que c\u2019est une question qui vous pr\u00e9oc-<br \/>\ncupe? Elle le devrait, car les donn\u00e9es formaient<br \/>\nl\u2019essentiel de la valeur ajout\u00e9e que les \u00e9valuateurs<br \/>\napportaient aux clients. Qu\u2019est-ce qui a chang\u00e9?<br \/>\nLes donn\u00e9es sont omnipr\u00e9sentes et pratiques.<br \/>\nDe plus, les \u00e9valuateurs doivent composer avec<br \/>\nla comp\u00e9tition de certains services, dont les<br \/>\nmod\u00e8les automatis\u00e9s d\u2019\u00e9valuation et d\u2019autres<br \/>\noutils de gestion du risque qui tiennent lieu<br \/>\nd\u2019\u00e9valuation.<\/p>\n<p>L\u2019industrie vit une consolidation et les<br \/>\ncompagnies de gestion en \u00e9valuation prennent<br \/>\nde plus en plus de place sur l\u2019\u00e9chiquier mondial.<br \/>\nDans certains pays d\u2019Europe, presque toute<br \/>\nl\u2019\u00e9valuation r\u00e9sidentielle est men\u00e9e par des<br \/>\ncompagnies de gestion en \u00e9valuation ou par des<br \/>\nentreprises du m\u00eame type qui emploient des<br \/>\n\u00e9valuateurs. \u00c0 en juger par ce qui se passe dans<br \/>\nd\u2019autres parties du monde, il se pourrait que les<br \/>\njours o\u00f9 l\u2019\u00e9valuateur r\u00e9sidentiel faisait cavalier<br \/>\nseul soient compt\u00e9s.<\/p>\n<p>Le march\u00e9 immobilier am\u00e9ricain est \u00e9gale-<br \/>\nment en pleine mutation et c\u2019est pourquoi<br \/>\nl\u2019Institut des \u00e9valuateurs a entrepris sa propre<br \/>\nplanification strat\u00e9gique dans l\u2019optique d\u2019une<br \/>\nrestructuration de l\u2019Institut comme tel et du<br \/>\nr\u00f4le de ses membres. Il y a quelques mois, le<br \/>\npr\u00e9sident Grant Uba et moi-m\u00eame avons eu le<br \/>\nprivil\u00e8ge de participer \u00e0 l\u2019une de leurs rencon-<br \/>\ntres et d\u2019y prendre la parole; il nous est apparu<br \/>\n\u00e9vident que les d\u00e9fis que doit relever la profes-<br \/>\nsion au Canada ne sont pas tr\u00e8s diff\u00e9rents de<br \/>\nceux auxquels doivent faire face nos coll\u00e8gues<br \/>\nam\u00e9ricains.<\/p>\n<p>L\u2019Institut des \u00e9valuateurs s\u2019est donn\u00e9 une<br \/>\nnouvelle direction strat\u00e9gique et a clairement<br \/>\nindiqu\u00e9 qu\u2019afin de maintenir sa prosp\u00e9rit\u00e9, il<br \/>\ndoit se d\u00e9marquer des autres alternatives de <\/p>\n<p>\u00ab Les organisations professionnelles du domaine de<br \/>\nl\u2019immobilier entreprennent d\u2019importantes d\u00e9marches <\/p>\n<p>de planification et orientent leurs boussoles vers<br \/>\nd\u2019autres directions et d\u2019autres avenues. \u00bb<\/p>\n<p>Canadian Property Valuation Volume 55 | book 2 | 2011 \u00c9valuation Immobili\u00e8re au Canada 13click here to return to table 0f contents<\/p>\n<p>services d\u2019\u00e9valuation par des normes de qualit\u00e9<br \/>\n\u00e9lev\u00e9es. Le fait d\u2019\u00eatre reconnu comme une<br \/>\nassociation professionnelle plut\u00f4t que comme<br \/>\nun corps de m\u00e9tier est l\u2019un des principaux<br \/>\nobjectifs vis\u00e9 par l\u2019Institut des \u00e9valuateurs. De<br \/>\nplus, l\u2019Institut a adopt\u00e9 des comp\u00e9tences de<br \/>\nbase qui seront la pierre angulaire des titres<br \/>\nprofessionnels.<\/p>\n<p>L\u2019Institut canadien des \u00e9valuateurs ne s\u2019est<br \/>\npas non plus crois\u00e9 les bras en ce qui a trait<br \/>\n\u00e0 la planification pour l\u2019avenir. D\u00e8s l\u2019aube du<br \/>\npr\u00e9sent mill\u00e9naire, l\u2019Institut a mis en \u0153uvre<br \/>\nun programme de restructuration issu d\u2019un<br \/>\nnouveau plan strat\u00e9gique audacieux dans lequel<br \/>\non retrouve l\u2019\u00e9nonc\u00e9 suivant :<\/p>\n<p>\u00ab\u00a0Les membres de l\u2019Institut canadien des<br \/>\n\u00e9valuateurs seront des professionnels reconnus pour<br \/>\nleur expertise et leur int\u00e9grit\u00e9 qui seront en mesure\u00a0:<br \/>\nd\u2019offrir un large \u00e9ventail de services li\u00e9s<br \/>\naux principes de valeur dans le domaine de<br \/>\nl\u2019immobilier; et de mener des projets, des<br \/>\ninitiatives et des organisations li\u00e9s \u00e0 la propri\u00e9t\u00e9;<br \/>\net d\u2019offrir du soutien, des conseils et des d\u00e9cisions<br \/>\nstrat\u00e9giques en ce qui a trait \u00e0 l\u2019immobilier et aux<br \/>\npropri\u00e9t\u00e9s.\u00a0\u00bb <\/p>\n<p>Ce plan constitue la carte routi\u00e8re de<br \/>\nl\u2019Institut depuis 10 ans et les initiatives<br \/>\nstrat\u00e9giques entreprises pendant cette p\u00e9riode<br \/>\nsont issues de ce plan. Une initiative importante<br \/>\na eu lieu en 2004 avec l\u2019inauguration du<br \/>\nprogramme Nouveaux horizons dans le<br \/>\ncadre duquel on a \u00e9tabli une proc\u00e9dure pour<br \/>\nfavoriser l\u2019atteinte des objectifs \u00e9nonc\u00e9s dans<br \/>\nle plan strat\u00e9gique. Depuis l\u2019inauguration<br \/>\nde ce programme, l\u2019Institut a mis l\u2019accent<br \/>\nsur l\u2019am\u00e9lioration du professionnalisme<br \/>\nde ses membres en \u00e9levant ses normes de<br \/>\nqualit\u00e9 par des crit\u00e8res d\u2019admission plus<br \/>\nrigoureux, un processus d\u2019attribution des titres<br \/>\nprofessionnels trois E (\u00e9ducation, exp\u00e9rience<br \/>\net examen), une proc\u00e9dure de pratique<br \/>\nprofessionnelle am\u00e9lior\u00e9e et un programme de<br \/>\nperfectionnement  professionnel plus vaste et<br \/>\npermanent. <\/p>\n<p>Sur une base annuelle, la planification<br \/>\nstrat\u00e9gique, quelle que soit la forme qu\u2019elle rev\u00eat,<br \/>\nest une partie importante des activit\u00e9s du Conseil<br \/>\nd\u2019administration de l\u2019IC\u00c9 et elle aide l\u2019IC\u00c9 \u00e0 rester<br \/>\nconcentr\u00e9 sur les objectifs qu\u2019il s\u2019est fix\u00e9s et \u00e0<br \/>\napporter les changements n\u00e9cessaires \u00e0 l\u2019atteinte<br \/>\nde ces objectifs. C\u2019est un processus continuel.<br \/>\n\u00c0 l\u2019heure actuelle, le Comit\u00e9 de planification<br \/>\nstrat\u00e9gique de l\u2019Institut canadien des \u00e9valuateurs<br \/>\nproc\u00e8de \u00e0 l\u2019examen et \u00e0 la r\u00e9vision de son plan<br \/>\nstrat\u00e9gique afin d\u2019assurer qu\u2019il est actuel et qu\u2019il<br \/>\nr\u00e9pond aux besoins non seulement d\u2019aujourd\u2019hui,<br \/>\nmais aussi de demain. <\/p>\n<p>vous vous demandez peut-\u00eatre quelle<br \/>\nest la voie \u00e0 suivre? Je sugg\u00e9rerais \u00e0 l\u2019Institut<br \/>\nde terminer le travail qu\u2019il a entrepris il y<br \/>\na plus de 10 ans. Le repositionnement de<br \/>\nl\u2019Institut et de ses membres en tant que<br \/>\nprofessionnels de l\u2019immobilier de premier<br \/>\nniveau, multidisciplinaires et dot\u00e9s d\u2019excellentes<br \/>\nqualifications est un travail de longue haleine qui<br \/>\nne devrait pas \u00eatre mis de c\u00f4t\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>L\u2019Institut doit poser un regard lucide sur<br \/>\nl\u2019avenir du march\u00e9 des services d\u2019\u00e9valuation<br \/>\nprofessionnelle, et ce, non seulement au Canada,<br \/>\nmais dans le monde entier, et veiller \u00e0 ce que les<br \/>\nmembres de l\u2019Institut canadien des \u00e9valuateurs<br \/>\nsoient pr\u00eats \u00e0 r\u00e9pondre pleinement aux besoins<br \/>\ndu march\u00e9 de l\u2019\u00e9valuation immobili\u00e8re et des<br \/>\nservices conseils connexes. L\u2019institut doit \u00eatre les <\/p>\n<p>yeux et les oreilles de la profession et conseiller<br \/>\nses membres sur la meilleure fa\u00e7on de se<br \/>\nprot\u00e9ger des effets n\u00e9gatifs et de tirer le meilleur<br \/>\nprofit possible de la multitude de nouvelles<br \/>\navenues qui s\u2019offrent \u00e0 eux. <\/p>\n<p>L\u2019Institut doit \u00e9galement veiller \u00e0 ce que<br \/>\nsa structure soit solide et assez souple pour<br \/>\ns\u2019adapter \u00e0 la rapidit\u00e9 des changements de<br \/>\nfa\u00e7on ponctuelle. \u00c0 ce sujet, la gouvernance<br \/>\nde l\u2019Institut doit \u00eatre examin\u00e9e, car elle est<br \/>\nessentielle au bon fonctionnement de l\u2019IC\u00c9.<br \/>\nCe serait le moment id\u00e9al pour entreprendre<br \/>\ncet exercice puisque l\u2019entr\u00e9e en vigueur de la<br \/>\nnouvelle l\u00e9gislation pour les organisations \u00e0 but<br \/>\nnon lucratif (Loi canadienne sur les Organisations<br \/>\n\u00e0 but non lucratif) obligera ces derni\u00e8res, dans un<br \/>\navenir tr\u00e8s rapproch\u00e9, \u00e0 r\u00e9viser et \u00e0 d\u00e9poser de<br \/>\nnouveaux r\u00e8glements. L\u2019heure est venue de sortir<br \/>\ndes sentiers battus et d\u2019envisager des fa\u00e7ons<br \/>\nde faire innovatrices pour permettre \u00e0 l\u2019Institut<br \/>\ndes \u00e9valuateurs de conserver sa position de<br \/>\nleadership pendant longtemps encore, et ce, en<br \/>\nd\u00e9pit des nombreux d\u00e9fis qu\u2019il devra relever au<br \/>\ncours des prochaines ann\u00e9es.<\/p>\n<p>C\u2019est pourquoi il est plus important que<br \/>\njamais pour les membres de l\u2019IC\u00c9 de formuler<br \/>\nleurs opinions sur l\u2019avenir de la profession et<br \/>\nleurs attentes envers l\u2019Institut. Les dirigeants de<br \/>\nl\u2019IC\u00c9 ont besoin d\u2019entendre les commentaires<br \/>\nde tous les membres \u2013 membres accr\u00e9dit\u00e9s<br \/>\net stagiaires, r\u00e9mun\u00e9r\u00e9s ou non, du secteur<br \/>\npriv\u00e9 et du secteur public. Les r\u00e9troactions des<br \/>\nmembres sont essentielles aux dirigeants de<br \/>\nl\u2019Institut, car ces derniers doivent obtenir une<br \/>\n\u00e9valuation \u00e9quilibr\u00e9e de toutes les questions,<br \/>\nde tous les probl\u00e8mes et de toutes les<br \/>\nsolutions \u00e9nonc\u00e9s. Ce n\u2019est qu\u2019en amor\u00e7ant une<br \/>\ndiscussion ouverte et constructive que l\u2019Institut<br \/>\net ses membres parviendront \u00e0 des r\u00e9alisations<br \/>\n\u00e9clair\u00e9es et prendront les d\u00e9cisions qui<br \/>\ns\u2019imposent. On dit qu\u2019il n\u2019y a pas de meilleur<br \/>\nmoment que le moment pr\u00e9sent pour agir. Le<br \/>\nprintemps rend cet adage particuli\u00e8rement<br \/>\npertinent.  <\/p>\n<p>\u00ab Il est plus important<br \/>\nque jamais pour les <\/p>\n<p>membres de l\u2019IC\u00c9<br \/>\nde formuler leurs <\/p>\n<p>opinions sur l\u2019avenir<br \/>\nde la profession et <\/p>\n<p>leurs attentes envers<br \/>\nl\u2019Institut. \u00bb<\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/www.solidifi.com<\/p>\n<p>Canadian Property Valuation Volume 55 | book 2 | 2011 \u00c9valuation Immobili\u00e8re au Canada 15click here to return to table 0f contents<\/p>\n<p>Peer reviewers<br \/>\nfind the experience a win-win for all<\/p>\n<p>A<br \/>\nAnne Clayton, AACI<\/p>\n<p>ppraisers volunteering for the<br \/>\nAppraisal Institute of Canada<br \/>\n(AIC) Peer Review Pilot Project <\/p>\n<p>are finding that the process benefits not only<br \/>\nthe membership as a whole, but also their<br \/>\nown professional development. First launched<br \/>\nin January 2009 as an opportunity for both<br \/>\nCandidates and accredited appraisers to obtain<br \/>\na constructive critique of their residential<br \/>\nvaluations, the project expanded a year later to<br \/>\nencompass commercial reports as well.  <\/p>\n<p>\u201cI think it is a very good program,\u201d says Anne<br \/>\nClayton, AACI, an appraisal consultant with Aspen<br \/>\nGrove Property Services. \u201cHere is an opportunity,<br \/>\nwithout your incurring any costs, to have<br \/>\nsomeone look at your report and see if you are on<br \/>\nthe right track and measuring up to standards.\u201d<br \/>\nBased in Pouce Coupe, British Columbia, Clayton<br \/>\nhas reviewed a half dozen appraisal reports as a<br \/>\nvolunteer for the project.<\/p>\n<p>She notes that, unlike a disciplinary situation<br \/>\nwhen the review of a report may result in a<br \/>\ncensure or suspension, a peer review is a positive<br \/>\nprocess, the goal being to make suggestions<br \/>\nfor improvement. \u201cWhen a complaint is lodged<br \/>\nagainst an appraiser, the process is long, arduous<br \/>\nand stressful,\u201d concurs Stanley Katchen, AACI, of<br \/>\nToronto\u2019s Katchen Appraisals Inc. \u201cAn appraiser<br \/>\ncan prevent that from happening by anticipating<br \/>\nproblems that may occur and addressing them.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Another peer reviewer, Keith Anderson<br \/>\nAACI, stresses that the program is meant to<br \/>\nbe educational, not judgemental. The AIC<br \/>\nensures that peer reviewers have no prior<br \/>\nconnection to the appraiser whose report they<br \/>\nare reviewing, and under no circumstances<br \/>\ncan a report that has been peer reviewed<br \/>\nbe referred to the Professional Practice<br \/>\nCommittee for investigation.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe peer review process allows an<br \/>\nexperienced appraiser and trained peer<br \/>\nreviewer to make honest, frank and<br \/>\nconstructive comments about a report,\u201d<br \/>\nsays Anderson, Appraiser Coordinator for the<br \/>\nCity of Hamilton\u2019s Real Estate Section. \u201cAny<br \/>\nappraiser can benefit from this program. It<br \/>\nis always beneficial to have someone else<br \/>\nproofread a report.\u201d  <\/p>\n<p>An appraisal can always be improved upon<br \/>\nagrees Ken Hollett, AACI, Regional Manager<br \/>\nof Real Property for Suncorp valuations in <\/p>\n<p>vancouver. \u201cIf possible, whether or not they<br \/>\nare participating in a formal peer review<br \/>\nprocess, which can take time to complete,<br \/>\nappraisers should have their report reviewed<br \/>\nby a colleague for suggestions before it is<br \/>\nreleased to a client.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Appraisers who work in groups regularly<br \/>\nconsult with one another. For sole practitioners,<br \/>\npeer review can fill the gap. \u201cIn most cases, we<br \/>\nare seeing reports from people who are one-<br \/>\nperson operations,\u201d says Mario Musso, AACI,<br \/>\nPresident of Musso Appraisals and Consulting, a<br \/>\nsix-appraiser firm in Kitchener, Ontario. <\/p>\n<p>The peer review process can also be<br \/>\nhelpful to appraisers tackling an unusual type<br \/>\nof property they may not have previously<br \/>\nencountered in their practice. \u201cIf you submit the<br \/>\nreport for peer review, you get the opportunity<br \/>\nto have input from someone who may have<br \/>\nexpertise in this type of property,\u201d notes<br \/>\nClayton. Requests are sent out to all reviewers, <\/p>\n<p>Glendon Todd, AACI Keith Anderson, AACI Ken Hollett, AACI Mario Musso, AACI Stan Katchen, AACI<\/p>\n<p>\u201cUnder no circumstances can a report<br \/>\nthat has been peer reviewed be referred <\/p>\n<p>to the Professional Practice Committee for<br \/>\ninvestigation.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Member PRofIle<\/p>\n<p>Canadian Property Valuation Volume 55 | book 2 | 2011 \u00c9valuation Immobili\u00e8re au Canada16 click here to return to table 0f contents<\/p>\n<p>who then take on a report based on their<br \/>\navailability, interest and expertise.<\/p>\n<p>She points out that, when going through<br \/>\nthe reports, reviewers also benefit from being<br \/>\nexposed to properties with which they might<br \/>\nhave limited experience. \u201cIf it is a different kind<br \/>\nof property than I have ever worked on, it gives<br \/>\nme an opportunity to look up the market and<br \/>\nsee if it really makes sense,\u201d she says. \u201cIt gets<br \/>\nme thinking about what should be explained in<br \/>\na report.\u201d Clayton adds that being in a northern<br \/>\ncommunity \u2013 Pouce Coupe is 10 km from<br \/>\nDawson Creek in northeastern BC \u2013 she has few<br \/>\nopportunities to take Continuing Professional<br \/>\nDevelopment (CPD) courses, and appreciates the<br \/>\nCPD credits she earns as a peer reviewer.  <\/p>\n<p>\u201cBeing a peer reviewer is beneficial for me<br \/>\nbecause it keeps me looking at the Canadian<br \/>\nUniform Standards of Professional Appraisal<br \/>\nPractice (CUSPAP),\u201d she says. \u201cWhile I am<br \/>\nevaluating their work, I am also evaluating my own.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The value of the process, says Musso, is that it<br \/>\nhelps all appraisers be more consistent in compliance,<br \/>\nformat, reasonableness and thought process. \u201cThe<br \/>\nbenefit gained is not only for the reviewee, but the<br \/>\nreviewer as well,\u201d he explains. \u201cIt gives you another<br \/>\nperspective from which we all benefit.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Anderson finds reading appraisal reports to<br \/>\nbe of great benefit because their content exposes<br \/>\nhim to interesting commentary, unique sources of<br \/>\ninformation and innovative methodologies. \u201cYou also<br \/>\nhave some aspects of appraisals that are wanting,<br \/>\nbut that is educational too,\u201d he says. \u201cIn either case,<br \/>\nit makes you think about how you write your own<br \/>\nappraisal reports and how they can be improved.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Glendon Todd, AACI, finds the process<br \/>\nvaluable because it reinforces what his quality<br \/>\nassurance review work at the Canada Revenue<br \/>\nAgency (CRA) already does. \u201cNow, when I look<br \/>\nat the work products of some of our own people<br \/>\nat CRA,\u201d says the Senior Appraisal Consultant, \u201cI<br \/>\nhave been noticing some of the same issues and I<br \/>\nhave become more adept at pointing these out to<br \/>\nour own appraisers.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Todd has been involved with the AIC as<br \/>\na volunteer for many years. He served on the <\/p>\n<p>executive of the Appraisal Institute of Canada \u2013<br \/>\nNewfoundland &#038; Labrador (AIC-NL) and was a<br \/>\npart-time instructor in the College of the North<br \/>\nAtlantic\u2019s Appraisal Assessment Technology<br \/>\nProgram before becoming a director of the<br \/>\nOntario Association. Today, he serves on the AIC<br \/>\nAdvisory Council that helps the Institute focus on<br \/>\nwhat industry clients need from the AIC and its<br \/>\nmembers. Because of his volunteer experience<br \/>\nand the nature of his work at CRA, Todd\u2019s<br \/>\ndecision to become a peer reviewer seemed a<br \/>\nnatural fit.  <\/p>\n<p>Like Todd, Katchen has been involved with<br \/>\nthe Institute both locally and provincially for more<br \/>\nthan 20 years and decided that participating in<br \/>\nthe pilot project would be a fitting extension of<br \/>\nthat involvement. Musso also sees his work as<br \/>\na reviewer as complementing what he already<br \/>\ndoes. \u201cI am a heavy promoter of mentoring,\u201d<br \/>\nhe explains, adding that the review process can<br \/>\nbe another useful tool for both Candidates and<br \/>\nnew appraisers. \u201cI decided to participate in peer<br \/>\nreview to give back to the industry. I want to<br \/>\nbe part of an organization where the reporting<br \/>\nrequirements are standardized, informative,<br \/>\nconsistent and compliant to CUSPAP.\u201d  <\/p>\n<p>Hollett points out that the standards are<br \/>\nminimum requirements. \u201cThe appraiser should <\/p>\n<p>always endeavour to do more than is required,\u201d<br \/>\nhe notes. It is an approach he applies broadly,<br \/>\ngoing beyond private practice to serve on the<br \/>\nBC Board of Examiners since 1998, reviewing<br \/>\nthe work product of Candidates applying for<br \/>\naccreditation.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI wanted to continue to offer my services<br \/>\nto the AIC in helping members become better<br \/>\nappraisers and, consequently, elevate the<br \/>\nappraisal profession in the eyes of the public,\u201d<br \/>\nsays Hollett, adding that he applied to volunteer<br \/>\nas a commercial peer reviewer in June 2009.<\/p>\n<p>Clayton and Anderson \u2013 veterans of the<br \/>\nprofession for almost 30 years \u2013 also chose to<br \/>\nbecome peer reviewers because they wanted to<br \/>\ngive back to the industry.<\/p>\n<p>To become a peer reviewer, a member initially<br \/>\nhas to submit a one-page memo outlining his<br \/>\nor her reasons for volunteering, along with a<br \/>\nsample of work product and Curriculum vitae.<br \/>\nShort-listed applicants then had to fill out a Peer<br \/>\nReview application form and take (or confirm<br \/>\nthey had taken) the continuing development<br \/>\ncourse on appraisal review from the University of<br \/>\nBritish Columbia. After being accepted as a peer<br \/>\nreviewer, the final step was a mandatory one-day<br \/>\npeer review training session in Ottawa.  <\/p>\n<p>\u201cI initially attended a training session in<br \/>\nOttawa and took CPD115 from UBC,\u201d says<br \/>\nHollett. \u201cI was already interested in taking the<br \/>\ncourse for my own personal development prior<br \/>\nto volunteering to serve on this committee.\u201d<br \/>\nHe adds that his company encourages staff to<br \/>\ncontinue to learn and improve through ongoing<br \/>\nprofessional development. So far, Hollett has only<br \/>\nreceived one report for peer review, but he looks<br \/>\nforward to reviewing many more.  <\/p>\n<p>Anderson has only received a few reports<br \/>\nto review as well, but those he has completed<br \/>\nto date have each involved between five<br \/>\nand 10 hours of work, depending on their <\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhen going through<br \/>\nthe reports, reviewers <\/p>\n<p>also benefit from being<br \/>\nexposed to properties <\/p>\n<p>with which they<br \/>\nmight have limited <\/p>\n<p>experience.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>Member PRofIle<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhile I am evaluating their work, I am also<br \/>\nevaluating my own.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Canadian Property Valuation Volume 55 | book 2 | 2011 \u00c9valuation Immobili\u00e8re au Canada 17click here to return to table 0f contents<\/p>\n<p>complexity. Says Anderson: \u201cReviewers try<br \/>\nto provide additional constructive criticism<br \/>\nbeyond strict compliance with CUSPAP, which,<br \/>\nfor example, could be related to more effective<br \/>\ncommunications, report template, presentation<br \/>\nor consistency throughout the report, and<br \/>\nreasonableness of the analysis and conclusions<br \/>\nfrom a \u2018reasonable appraiser\u2019 perspective.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>All six reviewers interviewed for this article<br \/>\nconfirmed that they allot time on evenings and<br \/>\nweekends to perform the peer reviews. The<br \/>\nprocess generally involves at least one complete<br \/>\nreading of the report without interruption,<br \/>\nfollowed by a second or third reading during<br \/>\nwhich they make notes and write responses to<br \/>\nthe checklist provided by the Institute.  <\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis is not the sort of work you can pick<br \/>\nup for an hour and then put down,\u201d notes<br \/>\nTodd, adding that the review often involves<br \/>\ngetting familiar with a particular property or<br \/>\nmarket. \u201cOnce you start, you want to look at it<br \/>\nclosely from start to finish. You want to ensure<br \/>\nconsistency of thought right through.\u201d   <\/p>\n<p>Katchen points out that going through<br \/>\nthe entire report two or three times gives the<br \/>\nreviewer time to reflect in between sittings.<br \/>\nHe also found that, while he spent from 10<br \/>\nto 12 hours on first reports he reviewed, the<br \/>\nprocess now often takes only four to five hours.<br \/>\nBecause of his experience in both residential and<br \/>\ncommercial appraisals, he reviews both types of<br \/>\nreports. Like Clayton, he attended the training<br \/>\nsessions both in 2008 (residential) and 2009<br \/>\n(commercial).  <\/p>\n<p>Generally, Clayton finds that the residential<br \/>\nreports take less time than the commercial<br \/>\nvariety. She finds that the process for both types<br \/>\nof reports is smoother since the reviewers met<br \/>\nby conference call and streamlined the checklist.<br \/>\nDuring the call, they discussed their progress and <\/p>\n<p>shared their experiences thus far.<br \/>\nReviewers not only review the appraisal <\/p>\n<p>reports, they also review the critique prepared<br \/>\nby other reviewers. For instance, it is important<br \/>\nthat all comments refer to the report, not the<br \/>\nappraiser who prepared it. The critique should<br \/>\nfocus on improvements that could be made,<br \/>\nwhile keeping the tone constructive. \u201cWhen the<br \/>\nend user sees the report once the peer review<br \/>\nis completed, we are hoping there is plenty of<br \/>\ninformation the member can use,\u201d says Musso.<\/p>\n<p>In fact, the entire process is geared to<br \/>\nsupporting those who submit their reports for<br \/>\nreview. At the end of the critique, reviewers<br \/>\ninclude their name and contact information so<br \/>\nthat those who generated the initial report can<br \/>\ncontact them to discuss any of the comments.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe do have a membership of good<br \/>\nappraisers. I generally found the reports I<br \/>\nreviewed to be complete and compliant,\u201d notes<br \/>\nMusso, adding that he noticed good reporting<br \/>\nskills and a well prepared format. \u201cUpon reading<br \/>\nthe appraisal documents, you could follow the<br \/>\ntrain of thought from beginning to end.\u201d The<br \/>\nmost common weakness, he noted, was the lack<br \/>\nof explanation in certain areas of the report.<\/p>\n<p>His fellow reviewers agree. \u201cThe danger we<br \/>\nhave when we write reports,\u201d explains Clayton,<br \/>\n\u201cis that we know the subject really well, but we<br \/>\ndo not always make ourselves clear.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Hollett concurs. \u201cOften, the thought process<br \/>\nof the appraiser does not get fully detailed in the<br \/>\nreport,\u201d he says. \u201cConsequently, it is not always<br \/>\neasy for the reader to follow the logic of how the<br \/>\nappraiser arrived at the conclusion from the data<br \/>\nand analysis provided.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Katchen elaborates: \u201cIf you cannot explain to me<br \/>\nwhat you did, how can you explain it to the client?\u201d  <\/p>\n<p>Anderson suggests that appraisers try to<br \/>\nplace themselves in the shoes of the client and <\/p>\n<p>reader of the report. \u201cThey should take time to<br \/>\nthink, what does this sound like to a lay person<br \/>\nreading it for the first time?\u201d he says. \u201cIs the<br \/>\nreport clearly conveying what is intended?<br \/>\nAdding one or a few extra paragraphs to explain<br \/>\nthe appraiser\u2019s rationale may not seem like much,<br \/>\nbut it can greatly improve the understanding and<br \/>\ncredibility of the appraisal.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cOne thing that stands out,\u201d he continues,<br \/>\nadding that it is something he has also seen<br \/>\nin the appraisals he reviews at work, \u201cis the<br \/>\nneed to improve the valuation analysis, or at<br \/>\nleast the communication of the analysis in the<br \/>\nappraisal report.\u201d For example, an appraiser<br \/>\nmight select and present good market data<br \/>\n(comparable sales, cap rates, lease rates, etc.),<br \/>\nbut fall short in presenting how the analysis of<br \/>\nthe data leads to a logical value conclusion.<\/p>\n<p>In other words, a \u2018reasonable appraiser\u2019<br \/>\nreading the report and assessing the market<br \/>\ndata might arrive at an entirely different<br \/>\nimpression of the market value. This is why<br \/>\nit is essential that reports include a rational<br \/>\ndiscussion of the valuation analysis that leads<br \/>\nan appraiser to a particular conclusion. \u201cThis<br \/>\nexercise is not only for the benefit of the<br \/>\nclient,\u201d explains Anderson, \u201cit also reaffirms to<br \/>\nthe appraiser that his or her analysis is sound.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>On the other hand, says Katchen,<br \/>\nsometimes the underlying problem is that<br \/>\nappraisers preparing reports did not initially<br \/>\ncommunicate with the client as much as they<br \/>\nshould have. In a few cases, Clayton found<br \/>\nthat members were not measuring the reports <\/p>\n<p>\u201cReviewers try to<br \/>\nprovide additional <\/p>\n<p>constructive criticism<br \/>\nbeyond strict <\/p>\n<p>compliance with<br \/>\nCUSPAP.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt makes you think about how you write your own<br \/>\nappraisal reports and how they can be improved.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Canadian Property Valuation Volume 55 | book 2 | 2011 \u00c9valuation Immobili\u00e8re au Canada18 click here to return to table 0f contents<\/p>\n<p>against CUSPAP to see if they complied with<br \/>\nstandards. If they took a few minutes to do<br \/>\nthat, she says, a lot of the mistakes she sees<br \/>\nwould never be made. <\/p>\n<p>For instance, she has seen many instances<br \/>\nwhere only one approach to value was used in<br \/>\nthe report. \u201cWhile, in some cases, it might not<br \/>\nbe incorrect to use only direct comparison,<br \/>\nfor example,\u201d she says, \u201cit is still necessary to<br \/>\njustify why no other approach was used.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Sometimes, the mistake is as simple as<br \/>\na Candidate forgetting to ask an accredited<br \/>\nappraiser to sign off on the report. In other cases<br \/>\n\u2013 particularly with residential appraisals \u2013 some<br \/>\nreports have given her the impression that the<br \/>\nappraiser might be trying to arrive at the answer<br \/>\nthe lender wanted to hear.  <\/p>\n<p>Todd has encountered an entirely different issue<br \/>\nin the residential appraisals he has reviewed. \u201cOften,<br \/>\nresidential work involves using a form,\u201d he explains.<br \/>\n\u201cIt almost seems as if some of our appraisers believe <\/p>\n<p>they have completed their due diligence by simply<br \/>\nfilling the space on the form and then moving on.<br \/>\nWhat they should be doing is determining the<br \/>\npurpose and function of the appraisal report, or how<br \/>\nthey can best lay out the analysis to lead the reader<br \/>\nto the same final opinion of value. Often, the forms<br \/>\ndo not do a very good job addressing that. You have<br \/>\nto go beyond the form.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Another problem, as identified by Musso, is<br \/>\nthat some appraisers are using older versions of the<br \/>\nforms from online subscriptions they have never<br \/>\nupdated. As a result, their reports may be using<br \/>\noutdated terminology. For instance, the forms<br \/>\nmight reference USPAP, when current reporting is<br \/>\nnow governed by CUSPAP.<\/p>\n<p>In the end, all these details are part of a<br \/>\nreviewer\u2019s most important function: determining<br \/>\nif the valuation is logical, reasonable and credible.<br \/>\n\u201cEven if an appraiser whose report has been<br \/>\nreviewed does not agree with all the reviewer\u2019s<br \/>\nopinions, there is usually something to be gained and <\/p>\n<p>nothing to be lost,\u201d says Anderson. \u201cPeer review is an<br \/>\nexcellent way to assist appraisers in improving their<br \/>\nproduct and professional livelihood.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>His colleague in Ottawa agrees<br \/>\nwholeheartedly. \u201cIn my appraisal career, I have<br \/>\nhad many helping hands along the way,\u201d says<br \/>\nTodd. \u201cI think we each need to do that in one way<br \/>\nor another. If there are ways we can help each<br \/>\nother, it is the right thing to do.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>\u201cAt the end of the critique, reviewers include their name and contact<br \/>\ninformation so that those who generated the initial report can contact them <\/p>\n<p>to discuss any of the comments.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Please check out the interactive Canadian Property Valuation at www.aicanada.ca<\/p>\n<p>With print and electronic communication operating hand-in-hand more than ever<br \/>\nbefore, we are pleased to advise you that Canadian Property Valuation magazine is<br \/>\navailable online in a highly interactive format. <\/p>\n<p>a user-friendly, interactive media Rich Pdf format that includes:<\/p>\n<p> active hyper-links to all websites and<br \/>\ne-mails contained in the publication<\/p>\n<p> active links to the specific stories from<br \/>\nthe front cover and contents page<\/p>\n<p> active links to advertiser websites from their ads<\/p>\n<p>Interactive edition of<br \/>\nCanadian ProPerty VaLUation<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe critique<br \/>\nshould focus on <\/p>\n<p>improvements that<br \/>\ncould be made, while <\/p>\n<p>keeping the tone<br \/>\nconstructive.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>Member PRofIle<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"fPd69TvK2w\"><p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.aicanada.ca\/\">Home<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" class=\"oembed-iframe\"  class=\"wp-embedded-content\" sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" style=\"position: absolute; clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);\" title=\"&#8220;Home&#8221; &#8212; Appraisal Institute of Canada\" src=\"https:\/\/www.aicanada.ca\/embed\/#?secret=gIkeg4VH7f#?secret=fPd69TvK2w\" data-secret=\"fPd69TvK2w\" width=\"500\" height=\"282\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>Purchasing a Home?  Refinancing?<\/p>\n<p>An Accredited Mortgage Professional (AMP) Can Help<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Find the best mortgage solution for you<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Explain all of your options<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Provide mortgage peace of mind<\/p>\n<p>Visit caamp.org to<br \/>\nfind an AMP near you<\/p>\n<p>Canadian Association of Accredited Mortgage Professionals<br \/>\nAssociation Canadienne des Conseillers Hypoth\u00e9caires Accr\u00e9dit\u00e9s<\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/www.caamp.org<\/p>\n<p>Canadian Property Valuation Volume 55 | book 2 | 2011 \u00c9valuation Immobili\u00e8re au Canada20 click here to return to table 0f contents<\/p>\n<p>By Beverley Girvan, AACI<br \/>\nChair, Marketing &#038; Communications Committee<\/p>\n<p>Listening nourishes success<\/p>\n<p>Marketing and Communications<\/p>\n<p>E<\/p>\n<p>Marketing &#038; Communications<br \/>\nCommittee<br \/>\nBeverley Girvan, AACI \u2013 Chair<br \/>\nJoanne Hayes, AACI<br \/>\nKathleen Ellis, AACI<br \/>\nLora Wylie, CRA<br \/>\nLaura Kemp, Candidate<br \/>\nDavid Babineau, AACI, Fellow<br \/>\nTo contact this committee, email:<br \/>\ncommunications@aicanada.ca<\/p>\n<p>verything old is new again. Is it that<br \/>\nsimple? Should we be so bold in this era<br \/>\nof revolutionary communication devices <\/p>\n<p>to simply look to the past? Reduce ourselves to<br \/>\nthe fundamentals? In an age where the tele-<br \/>\nphone is reportedly on the way out, and Twitter,<br \/>\ntexting and Facebook have become the basis for<br \/>\ncommunicating, perhaps we should realize there<br \/>\nmight be an element of communication that we<br \/>\nhave overlooked.<\/p>\n<p>Over time, how often have we recognized<br \/>\n\u2018such a good listener\u2019 as a strong character trait?<br \/>\nIf it is so admired, why don\u2019t more of us practice<br \/>\nit? How hard can it be? In fact, it may very well<br \/>\nbe the easiest form of communication we can<br \/>\nadopt. Or is it so easy? Perhaps we need to<br \/>\nretrain ourselves from the communication style<br \/>\nof needing to continually impart information<br \/>\nand opinions. In the endeavor to learn and gain<br \/>\nwisdom, hearing the sound of only our own voice<br \/>\nmay not be as enlightening as we thought.<\/p>\n<p>When we are not listening, we are talking.<br \/>\nWe interrupt, we judge, we criticize, we diag-<br \/>\nnose, we analyze. Is this a good form of commu-<br \/>\nnication? Not always. Listening is not a passive<br \/>\nactivity; we have to actually hear. Being effective<br \/>\nas a listener is actually hearing what is being said.<br \/>\nLetting your audience know that you are with<br \/>\nthem, both listening and hearing, introduces<br \/>\nanother communication form that is also non-<br \/>\nverbal \u2013 body language. How do you listen? Be<br \/>\nattentive to your posture, your eye contact, your<br \/>\nphysical movements, and your focus.<\/p>\n<p>If you are to gain the confidence of the person<br \/>\nspeaking, they need to know they have your<br \/>\nattention. And while verbal interaction to encour-<br \/>\nage the speaker is recommended, comments and<br \/>\nquestions should be used sparingly. Nodding and<br \/>\nuttering \u201ca-ha\u2019s\u201d will prompt continued dialogue <\/p>\n<p>without committal on your part to agreement.<br \/>\nUnless requested, there is no need to let loose on<br \/>\nhow you would handle a similar situation. This is<br \/>\ntheir story, not yours. In the event of an anxious<br \/>\nclient or employer, let the speaker have his say.<br \/>\nListen carefully until they are finished before you<br \/>\nlaunch your explanation. Giving this respect to<br \/>\nthe speaker can go a long way to defusing what<br \/>\nmay be an explosive situation. It is not always<br \/>\nwhat you say, but when you say it that matters<br \/>\nmost.<\/p>\n<p>Reducing outside distractions, like turning off<br \/>\nyour smart phone, and perhaps leaning physically<br \/>\ninto the speaker, lets them know they have your<br \/>\near. Be on a passion-to-passion level. You will<br \/>\nbe creating empathy in displaying a willingness<br \/>\nto view from another perspective. This creates <\/p>\n<p>validation. Whoever validates their client by<br \/>\nlistening to their client, owns their client. <\/p>\n<p>Listening nourishes our social and profes-<br \/>\nsional success. It is beneficial to be emotionally<br \/>\navailable. It is then that you really learn. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhoever validates their client by listening to their<br \/>\nclient, owns their client.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>mailto:communications@aicanada.ca<\/p>\n<p>Canadian Property Valuation Volume 55 | book 2 | 2011 \u00c9valuation Immobili\u00e8re au Canada 21click here to return to table 0f contents<\/p>\n<p>Legal neWs &#038; VIeWs<br \/>\nBy robert Smithson, LL.B<\/p>\n<p>Smithson Employment Law Corporation, Kelowna, BC <\/p>\n<p>Blurring the line between<br \/>\ncontractors and employees<\/p>\n<p>hanges to the employment insurance<br \/>\n(EI) system have blurred the tradi-<br \/>\ntional line separating independent <\/p>\n<p>contractors from employees.\u00a0A review of recent<br \/>\ndecisions in other forums suggests there is<br \/>\nan ongoing trend towards treating these two<br \/>\ngroups as one.<\/p>\n<p>In the EI world, previously, only true employ-<br \/>\nees were eligible for coverage.\u00a0Not having that<br \/>\naspect of our social security net to fall back on<br \/>\nwas one of the risks of being self-employed and<br \/>\noperating as an independent contractor.<\/p>\n<p>In late 2009, the federal Fairness for the<br \/>\nSelf-Employed Act was passed.\u00a0It permits self-<br \/>\nemployed persons to opt into the EI program to<br \/>\nreceive certain special benefits.\u00a0The EI coverage<br \/>\nfor which the self-employed are now eligible<br \/>\nincludes maternity, parental, sickness, and<br \/>\ncompassionate care benefits.<\/p>\n<p>In the labour relations realm, a decision out<br \/>\nof Alberta suggests that independent contrac-<br \/>\ntors may be treated as employees for the pur-<br \/>\npose of determining whether they can unionize.<br \/>\nThe Alberta Labour Relations Board reviewed<br \/>\nthe circumstances of taxi drivers, including<br \/>\nthose who are owner-operators of their taxis<br \/>\nor who lease them from other owner-opera-<br \/>\ntors.\u00a0Represented by the Teamsters union, the<br \/>\ntaxi drivers were engaged by Access Taxi.<\/p>\n<p>The Board addressed their application to<br \/>\nunionize by applying a \u2018purposive\u2019 approach<br \/>\nto the definition of \u2018employee\u2019 found in the<br \/>\nAlberta Labour Relations Code.\u00a0The Board<br \/>\ndetermined that, even if the drivers were in<br \/>\nsome sense self-employed, the taxi company<br \/>\nexercised\ta\tsufficient\tdegree\tof\tcontrol\tand<br \/>\nsupervision that they should be treated as<br \/>\nemployees and be allowed to unionize.<\/p>\n<p>The Ontario Court of Appeal recently<br \/>\ndetermined that the definition of \u2018employed\u2019 in<br \/>\nthat province\u2019s Occupational Health and Safety<br \/>\nAct must be interpreted broadly enough to<br \/>\nencompass independent contractors.\u00a0That deci-<br \/>\nsion arose out of a worksite accident involving <\/p>\n<p>a truck driver \u2013 an independent contractor<br \/>\n\u2013 providing services to United Independent<br \/>\nOperators Limited.\u00a0The Ontario Ministry of<br \/>\nLabour laid charges against United for failing to<br \/>\ncomply with the requirements of the Act.<\/p>\n<p>Although the Workplace Safety and Insur-<br \/>\nance Board, Revenue Canada, the Employment<br \/>\nStandards Branch, and the lower courts had<br \/>\nall determined that United\u2019s truck drivers were<br \/>\nindependent contractors, the Court of Appeal<br \/>\nunanimously held that the truck drivers were<br \/>\n\u201cregularly employed\u201d for the purposes of the<br \/>\nAct. This is a decision that seems destined for a<br \/>\nfinal word from the Supreme Court of Canada.<\/p>\n<p>In British Columbia, the Human Rights<br \/>\nTribunal recently determined that an equity<br \/>\npartner at the law firm of Fasken Martineau<br \/>\nDumoulin LLP could be considered employed<br \/>\nfor the purposes of the Human Rights Code.<br \/>\nFasken\u2019s had attempted to force equity partner<br \/>\nJohn McCormick to retire from the practice of<br \/>\nlaw, at age 65, in accordance with the firm\u2019s<br \/>\npartnership agreement.\u00a0McCormick filed a com-<br \/>\nplaint of discrimination pursuant to the Code.<\/p>\n<p>Fasken\u2019s argued that the Tribunal had<br \/>\nno jurisdiction because McCormick was not<br \/>\nin a relationship of \u201cemployment\u201d with the<br \/>\nfirm.\u00a0The Tribunal disagreed, gave a broad,<br \/>\nliberal, and purposive interpretation to the<br \/>\nCode, and held that McCormick was employed<br \/>\nby Fasken\u2019s in the context of how that term is<br \/>\nused in the Code.<\/p>\n<p>These various developments seem to<br \/>\namount to four clear blows to the integrity<br \/>\nof the legal status of independent contrac-<br \/>\ntors.\u00a0Where I come from, that amounts to a<br \/>\ntrend, but where it will go next is anybody\u2019s<br \/>\nguess. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cThese various<br \/>\ndevelopments seem to <\/p>\n<p>amount to four clear blows<br \/>\nto the integrity of the legal <\/p>\n<p>status of independent<br \/>\ncontractors.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>C<\/p>\n<p>Canadian Property Valuation Volume 55 | book 2 | 2011 \u00c9valuation Immobili\u00e8re au Canada22 click here to return to table 0f contents<\/p>\n<p>Insurance<\/p>\n<p>The Appraisal Institute of Canada (AIC) Professional Liability Insurance Program (PLIP)  was established in 1988 to provide<br \/>\nAIC members with protection against claims<br \/>\nfor errors and omissions made in the rendering<br \/>\nof professional services. The Program, which is<br \/>\nmandatory for all members, currently provides<br \/>\ninsurance coverage of up to $2 million per claim<br \/>\nand in the aggregate annually. The policy has an<br \/>\nannual member aggregate claim limit of $20.5<br \/>\nmillion and protects members and the public<br \/>\nagainst errors and omissions made in the course<br \/>\nof delivering appraisal and related consulting<br \/>\nservices. A major objective of the Program is to<br \/>\npromote high quality practice standards and<br \/>\nimplement effective claims prevention and man-<br \/>\nagement strategies to keep member insurance<br \/>\ncosts as low as possible. <\/p>\n<p>Insurance premiums are actuarially deter-<br \/>\nmined and reflect historical and forecast claims<br \/>\nand other risk factors by member type (AACI,<br \/>\nCRA or Candidate) and by category (fee or non-<br \/>\nfee). For insurance purposes, \u2018fee appraisers\u2019 are<br \/>\nmembers who render \u2018Professional Services\u2019 on a<br \/>\nfee-for-service basis, whether directly to a client<br \/>\nor indirectly on behalf of an employer or a con-<br \/>\ntractor to whom a fee is paid. Non-fee appraisers <\/p>\n<p>are members who are salaried employees of<br \/>\npublic or private sector organizations and who<br \/>\nprovide \u2018Professional Services\u2019 to an employer for<br \/>\nthe internal use of the organization only.<\/p>\n<p>The insurance policy defines \u2018Professional<br \/>\nServices\u2019 as real estate appraisal services includ-<br \/>\ning opinions and\/or counselling rendered by a<br \/>\nmember of the AIC who, at the time of providing<br \/>\nthe services, was qualified and authorized to<br \/>\ndo so under the by-laws and regulations of the<br \/>\nInstitute. <\/p>\n<p>Members who are providing and taking<br \/>\nresponsibility for \u2018Professional Services\u2019 as<br \/>\ndescribed above, whether in the public or<br \/>\nprivate sector, full-time or part-time, directly<br \/>\nor indirectly on a \u2018fee\u2019 basis, must be registered<br \/>\nas \u2018fee\u2019 members with respect to the AIC<br \/>\nProfessional Liability Insurance Program and pay<br \/>\nthe appropriate insurance premiums.<\/p>\n<p>Unlike other liability insurance in the<br \/>\nmarketplace, the AIC\u2019s Professional Liability<br \/>\nInsurance Program is a true member program<br \/>\nthat guarantees availability of coverage to all<br \/>\nAACIs, CRAs and Candidates in good standing.<br \/>\nUpon retirement, members in good standing<br \/>\ncan purchase insurance that offers perpetual<br \/>\nprotection for prior acts. <\/p>\n<p>The AIC can provide this reliable liability<br \/>\ninsurance at a reasonable cost to the member<br \/>\nbecause it owns the insurance company that<br \/>\nreinsures a portion of the program risk. <\/p>\n<p>The First Professional Liability Insurance<br \/>\nCompany Limited (FPLICL) is a corporation wholly<br \/>\nowned by the Institute. While AIC is the sole<br \/>\nshareholder of FPLIC, the insurance subsidiary is<br \/>\nindependent from the Institute and is overseen by<br \/>\nits own Board of Directors whose members are<br \/>\nelected by the Institute and are accountable to the<br \/>\nshareholder \u2013 the Appraisal Institute of Canada.<\/p>\n<p> It was established in 2006 to:<br \/>\n\u2022\t segregate\tthe\tassets\tand\tliabilities\tof\tthe\t<\/p>\n<p>professional association from those of the insur-<br \/>\nance program (this protects the AIC from any<br \/>\nliabilities that accrue to the insurance program<br \/>\nand its operation);<\/p>\n<p>\u2022\t remove\tInstitute\tdirectors\tfrom\tany\tinsurance<br \/>\nrelated liability; <\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe AIC\u2019s Professional Liability Insurance Program<br \/>\nis a true member program that guarantees <\/p>\n<p>availability of coverage to all AACIs, CRAs and<br \/>\nCandidates in good standing.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The Professional<br \/>\nLiability Insurance Program (Part III)<br \/>\nPart I of this article was published in Canadian Property Valuation, Book 4, 2010, and Part II in Book 1, 2011<\/p>\n<p> \u201cA major objective<br \/>\nof the Program is to <\/p>\n<p>promote high quality<br \/>\npractice standards and <\/p>\n<p>implement effective<br \/>\nclaims prevention and <\/p>\n<p>management strategies<br \/>\nto keep member <\/p>\n<p>insurance costs as low as<br \/>\npossible.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>Canadian Property Valuation Volume 55 | book 2 | 2011 \u00c9valuation Immobili\u00e8re au Canada 23click here to return to table 0f contents<\/p>\n<p>\u2022\t expand\tthe\tprogram\u2019s\taccess\tto\tinsurers\tfrom<br \/>\naround the world to achieve enhanced cover-<br \/>\nage at low cost;<\/p>\n<p>\u2022\t provide\tadditional\tinsurance\tcoverage\tto<br \/>\naddress expanding range of appraisal services;<br \/>\nand<\/p>\n<p>\u2022\t enhance\tthe\tinsurance\tfund\u2019s\tinvestment<br \/>\npotential to achieve higher returns.<\/p>\n<p>FPLICL is domiciled in Barbados and is not<br \/>\nlicensed to directly provide insurance in Canada.<br \/>\nIt reinsures a portion of the risk covered by the<br \/>\ninsurance policy issued by Travelers Guarantee<br \/>\nCompany of Canada, the AIC program\u2019s insurer. <\/p>\n<p>FPLICL is managed on a day to day basis<br \/>\nby Amphora Captive Insurance Managers, a<br \/>\nprofessional insurance management company in<br \/>\nBarbados. FPLICL maintains a fund that supports<br \/>\nthe reinsurance that it provides to the program.<br \/>\nAll investments pertaining to the First Profes-<br \/>\nsional Liability Insurance Company Limited are<br \/>\nmanaged by the Board of Directors of the First<br \/>\nProfessional Liability Insurance Company. In<br \/>\naccordance with Barbadian law, the FPLIC Board<br \/>\nconsists of three Barbadians, and two Canadian<br \/>\ndirectors who are designated members of the<br \/>\nInstitute. <\/p>\n<p>As at this time, the funds are invested with the<br \/>\nRoyal Bank of Canada (Caribbean) in fixed income<br \/>\nsecurities, including bonds and cash.<\/p>\n<p>The fund\u2019s positive performance is one of the<br \/>\nreasons that overall premiums have increased an<br \/>\naverage of just 2% year over year during the period<br \/>\n2003 through 2011. Nonetheless, the economic <\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe AIC can provide this reliable liability insurance at a reasonable cost<br \/>\nto the member because it owns the insurance company that reinsures a <\/p>\n<p>portion of the program risk.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>downturn of recent years has resulted in an increase<br \/>\nin both the number and severity of claims. It is<br \/>\nexpected that this increase will abate as the economy<br \/>\nturns around, but, in the short run, the negative<br \/>\nimpact will likely result in an increase in premiums. <\/p>\n<p>Claims prevention is one of the best ways<br \/>\nto help keep premiums reasonable. Over the<br \/>\nyears, AIC has issued claims prevention bulletins<br \/>\nand addressed the issue through the insurance<br \/>\nsegment of the AIC Professional Practice Seminar.<br \/>\nNow, a new program has been established to<br \/>\nenhance claims prevention. The Professional<br \/>\nExcellence Program will focus on providing <\/p>\n<p>members with timely information, best practices,<br \/>\nand practical advice aimed at enhancing the<br \/>\nquality of appraisal work and reducing claims.<br \/>\nThis will be achieved through a section of the AIC<br \/>\nwebsite dedicated to professional excellence.<\/p>\n<p>The AIC insurance program continues to<br \/>\nevolve and guiding it is an Insurance Advisory<br \/>\nCommittee established in January 2011 that is<br \/>\ncomprised of fee appraisers who will be review-<br \/>\ning the program with the aim of enhancing<br \/>\npolicy benefits and working to ensure that the<br \/>\nAIC professional liability insurance program<br \/>\nmeets the growing needs of all AIC members. <\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"9VPQr6oB4r\"><p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ara.ca\/\">Home<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" class=\"oembed-iframe\"  class=\"wp-embedded-content\" sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" style=\"position: absolute; clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);\" title=\"&#8220;Home&#8221; &#8212; ARA - Atlantic Realty Advisors\" src=\"http:\/\/www.ara.ca\/embed\/#?secret=thLuHKG47Z#?secret=9VPQr6oB4r\" data-secret=\"9VPQr6oB4r\" width=\"500\" height=\"282\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>Canadian Property Valuation Volume 55 | book 2 | 2011 \u00c9valuation Immobili\u00e8re au Canada24 click here to return to table 0f contents<\/p>\n<p>Ad hoc committee<br \/>\nfocuses on Candidates<\/p>\n<p>By Dan Wilson AACI<br \/>\nChair, Ad Hoc Candidacy Committee<\/p>\n<p>Candidacy<\/p>\n<p>The Ad Hoc Candidacy Committee was established by the Board of Directors in November 2010 and is comprised<br \/>\nof volunteers from all of the Appraisal<br \/>\nInstitute of Canada (AIC) standing committees<br \/>\nincluding Learning Advisory, Professional<br \/>\nCompetency and Qualifications, Applied<br \/>\nExperience, Insurance Advisory, Marketing<br \/>\nand Communications, Professional Affairs<br \/>\nCoordinating, and Forms Sub-committee.<br \/>\nThe committee also has representation from<br \/>\nprovincial and national staff and is chaired by<br \/>\nAIC vice-President Dan Wilson.  <\/p>\n<p>This ad hoc committee\u2019s mandate is to<br \/>\ninvestigate all issues of Candidate co-signing<br \/>\nidentified in the 2009 PQCC Focus Group<br \/>\nReport, correspondence received from<br \/>\nprovincial\taffiliates\ton\tco-signing\tand<br \/>\ncandidacy matters, as well as further input that<br \/>\nthey\tobtain\tfrom\tmembers\tand\taffiliates\ton<br \/>\ncandidacy and mentoring issues. <\/p>\n<p>The terms of reference for the committee<br \/>\nwere approved by the AIC Board of Directors in<br \/>\nFebruary 2011 and are as follows:<\/p>\n<p>Mandate:<br \/>\nTo undertake a process review of the of the<br \/>\nCandidate experience, from recruitment to<br \/>\nsuccessful achievement of the designation,<br \/>\nincluding the stages of the process, the<br \/>\nimpact of AIC policies on that process, and<br \/>\nthe environment in which the Candidate<br \/>\nmay function. Conduct a SWOT analysis of<br \/>\nthe processes to identify any challenges that<br \/>\nCandidates may face in order to identify<br \/>\nimprovements and make recommendations to<br \/>\nthe Board. <\/p>\n<p>Activities:<br \/>\n\u2022\t Define\tthe\tCandidate\tprocess\t(life-cycle)\t<\/p>\n<p>from recruitment to designation, including<br \/>\nmentoring. <\/p>\n<p>\u2022\t Articulate\tthe\tpolicies\tthat\thave\tan\timpact<br \/>\non the process and how they impact the<br \/>\nprocess. <\/p>\n<p>\u2022\t Define\tthe\tchallenges\tcreated\tfor\tCandidates,<br \/>\nboth within and external to the candidate\u2019s<br \/>\ncontrol. <\/p>\n<p>\u2022\t Define\tthe\tcommittee\tand\tadministrative<br \/>\nroles in the process and identify areas of<br \/>\noverlap or deficiency. <\/p>\n<p>\u2022\t Define\tthe\timpact\tof\tthe\tcurrent\tenvironment<br \/>\nin which Candidates function on their ability<br \/>\nto be successful. <\/p>\n<p>\u2022\t Develop\trecommendations\tfor\timprovement<br \/>\nwhere required. <\/p>\n<p>\u2022\t Identify\texternal\tenvironmental\tfactors<br \/>\nthat affect Candidate members of AIC,<br \/>\nand that may limit AIC\u2019s ability to change.<br \/>\n(For example, given the other appraisal<br \/>\nassociations, do our policies and procedures<br \/>\ndrive members out of the AIC into other <\/p>\n<p>associations, and what impact does the<br \/>\ninterprovincial mobility on trade have on the<br \/>\nAIC and our relations with licensed provinces<br \/>\nand the National Occupation Standards?) <\/p>\n<p>Desired outcome:<br \/>\nTo create a positive environment that contributes<br \/>\nto the recruitment, education and experience of<br \/>\nCandidates in providing them with a congenial<br \/>\nenvironment of training and experience as they<br \/>\nmove through the professional development<br \/>\ncycle to designation and, ultimately, where they<br \/>\ncan excel as designated members and enjoy a<br \/>\nrewarding career as a professional appraiser and<br \/>\nmember of AIC. <\/p>\n<p>The Board will receive the committee\u2019s final<br \/>\nreport at their November 2011 meeting.   <\/p>\n<p>Members are encouraged to share their<br \/>\nthoughts, concerns and input on the entire<br \/>\ncandidacy process from recruitment to designation.<br \/>\nPlease submit your comments via email to the<br \/>\ncommittee at candidacy@aicanada.ca. \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/p>\n<p>Ad Hoc Candidacy Process Committee<br \/>\nDan Wilson, AACI \u2013 Chair<br \/>\nBrad Brewster, AACI<br \/>\nApril Green, AACI<br \/>\nClifford Smirl, AACI<br \/>\nGordon Brewer, AACI<br \/>\nWilliam Gossett, AACI<br \/>\nLaura Kemp, Candidate<br \/>\nEd Saxe, CRA<br \/>\nSigne Holstein<br \/>\nTo contact this committee, email:<br \/>\ncandidacy@aicanada.ca<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe desired outcome<br \/>\nis to create a positive <\/p>\n<p>environment that<br \/>\ncontributes to the <\/p>\n<p>recruitment, education<br \/>\nand experience of <\/p>\n<p>Candidates.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>mailto:candidacy@aicanada.ca<br \/>\nmailto:candidacy@aicanada.ca<\/p>\n<p>Canadian Property Valuation Volume 55 | book 2 | 2011 \u00c9valuation Immobili\u00e8re au Canada 25click here to return to table 0f contents<\/p>\n<p>Revised:  April 18, 2011<\/p>\n<p>Candidate Course per Year (CPY) Decision Tree <\/p>\n<p>(1) Compassionate reasons: Due to medical<br \/>\nreason (a doctor\u2019s note may be required) or<br \/>\nserious family matters, bereavement leave,<br \/>\nmaternity or parental leave. <\/p>\n<p>(2) Candidates who have completed all course<br \/>\nrequirement including the Guide Case Study<br \/>\n(GCS) have 3 yrs from Sep 30 of the year<br \/>\nthey complete those requirements to<br \/>\nobtain their designation. Failure to obtain<br \/>\ntheir designation within that time frame will<br \/>\nresult in a renewal of the CPY requirement. <\/p>\n<p>(3) Fail a course and didn\u2019t take any measure to<br \/>\ncomply with the CPY policy. <\/p>\n<p>(4) Exam rewrite: Candidates must write on the<br \/>\nnext available exam date. <\/p>\n<p>(5) Deferred exam: Candidates may defer an<br \/>\nexamination once but must write the exam<br \/>\non the next available exam date; if<br \/>\nunsuccessful, the Candidate is subject to<br \/>\nexam rewrite policy in (4) above. <\/p>\n<p>(6) Course transfer: Candidates may transfer<br \/>\nonly once beyond the current CPY period<br \/>\n(Oct 1 to Sep 30) to a course that has an<br \/>\nofficial start date prior to Dec 31 (a<br \/>\nmaximum extension of three months);<br \/>\nCandidates who transfer are ineligible for<br \/>\nexam deferral in (5) above; if Candidate is<br \/>\nunsuccessful in writing the exam, the<br \/>\nCandidate is eligible for exam rewrite as per<br \/>\n(4) above. <\/p>\n<p>(7) In all cases of extensions, the Candidate is<br \/>\nrequired to complete the prior year\u2019s CPY<br \/>\nrequirement PLUS the current year\u2019s CPY as<br \/>\nwell. <\/p>\n<p>CPY policy<br \/>\n(exception)<\/p>\n<p>Exemptions<\/p>\n<p>Approved<\/p>\n<p>Compassionate reasons (1)<\/p>\n<p>Completed  2 or more courses  in<br \/>\nthe previous CPY period<\/p>\n<p>All courses completed including<br \/>\nGCS = exempt for 3 yrs(2)<\/p>\n<p>Declined<\/p>\n<p>Too busy at work and \/or at home<\/p>\n<p>Fail course(3)<\/p>\n<p>Not a University level course<\/p>\n<p>Extensions(7)<\/p>\n<p>(CPY required)<\/p>\n<p>Approved<\/p>\n<p>Currently enrolled in BUSI 399\/499<\/p>\n<p>Exam rewrite(4) or deferred exam(5)<\/p>\n<p>Course transfer(6)<\/p>\n<p>Declined<\/p>\n<p>Too busy at work and \/or at home<\/p>\n<p>Didn&rsquo;t meet the deadline of<br \/>\nprevious extension<\/p>\n<p>By Brad Brewster, AACI<br \/>\nMember, Professional Qualifications &#038; Competency Committee<\/p>\n<p>Professional Qualifications<\/p>\n<p>What is the<br \/>\nAIC candidacy process?<\/p>\n<p>lthough the present policy pertain-<br \/>\ning to Appraisal Institute of Canada<br \/>\n(AIC) Candidates has been in place <\/p>\n<p>since\tJanuary\t1,\t2007,\tthere\tstill\tseems\tto\tbe\tsome<br \/>\nconfusion regarding exactly what the requirements<br \/>\nfor candidacy are.<br \/>\n\u2022\t Since\t2007,\tAIC\tCandidates\tjoining\tthe\tInstitute\tare\t<\/p>\n<p>required to either hold a university degree;<br \/>\nOR<br \/>\nhave 10 or fewer remaining requirements for<br \/>\nthe AACI designation (university degree and AIC<br \/>\ncourses).  <\/p>\n<p>\u2022\t They\talso\thave\tto\tsuccessfully\tcomplete\tthe\tWe <\/p>\n<p>Value Canada online workshop as well as BUSI 330<br \/>\nor approved equivalent.  <\/p>\n<p>\u2022\t New\tCandidates\tmust\talso\tcomplete\tthe\tProfes-<br \/>\nsional Practice (Standards) seminar within 24<br \/>\nmonths of being admitted as a Candidate.  <\/p>\n<p>Further, Candidates who joined the Institute since<br \/>\nJanuary 1, 2006 have 10 years from their admission<br \/>\ndate to complete all education, curriculum, and<br \/>\napplied experience requirements to obtain their<br \/>\ndesignation of choice. Candidates who joined prior<br \/>\nto January 1, 2006 must complete all education, cur-<br \/>\nriculum and applied experience requirements before<br \/>\nJanuary 1, 2018.<\/p>\n<p>In addition, all Candidates are required to suc-<br \/>\ncessfully complete one university credit course (CPY)<br \/>\ntowards designation each year in order to retain<br \/>\nCandidate status. In rare circumstances, upon written<br \/>\nrequest, an exception to this requirement may be<br \/>\nmade. Decisions are made in accordance with  the CPY<br \/>\nDecision Tree below.<\/p>\n<p>Candidates who have completed all course<br \/>\nrequirements, including the guided case study, are CPY<br \/>\nexempt for a period of three years from September 30<br \/>\nof the year they complete those requirements to obtain<br \/>\ntheir designation.  <\/p>\n<p>Candidate who otherwise fail to comply with <\/p>\n<p>A<\/p>\n<p>Canadian Property Valuation Volume 55 | book 2 | 2011 \u00c9valuation Immobili\u00e8re au Canada26 click here to return to table 0f contents<\/p>\n<p>Professional Qualifications<br \/>\nand Competency Committee<br \/>\nCharles Johnstone, AACI \u2013 Chair<br \/>\nBrad Brewster, AACI<br \/>\nRoland Mayr, AACI<br \/>\nJeff Godfrey, AACI<br \/>\nAlfred Mullally, AACI<br \/>\nJanice O\u2019Brien, ED, AIC &#8211; BC<br \/>\nTo contact this committee, email:<br \/>\npqcc@aicanada.ca<\/p>\n<p>the CPY policy are subject to a $500.00 fine and<br \/>\nsuspension of their candidacy status until they report<br \/>\nsuccessful completion of the requirements and<br \/>\npay the fine. The mandatory Professional Practice<br \/>\n(Standards) Seminar must also be completed once<br \/>\nin every five-year cycle and failure to do so will also<br \/>\nresult in suspension of the Candidate\u2019s status and a<br \/>\n$500.00 fine until he or she has successfully com-<br \/>\npleted the seminar and its exam and paid the fine.<\/p>\n<p>It is important to note that:<br \/>\n1) reports prepared by suspended Candidates will <\/p>\n<p>have no insurance coverage, even if co-signed by a<br \/>\ndesignated member in good standing;<\/p>\n<p>2) suspended Candidates have no insurance<br \/>\ncoverage as long as they remain suspended;<\/p>\n<p>3) suspended Candidates will be removed from<br \/>\nthe Co-signing Registry and a notification will<br \/>\nbe sent to responsible designated members;<br \/>\nand<\/p>\n<p>4) suspended Candidates remain members of<br \/>\nthe AIC and must pay their annual dues and<br \/>\ninsurance premium.<\/p>\n<p>Further, as part of the Applied Experience <\/p>\n<p>Program (AEP):<br \/>\n\u2022\t Candidates\tseeking\tthe\tCRA\tdesignation\tmust\t<\/p>\n<p>successfully complete a minimum of one year of<br \/>\nmentored applied experience; and <\/p>\n<p>\u2022\t members\tseeking\tthe\tAACI\tdesignation\tmust<br \/>\nsuccessfully complete a minimum of two years of<br \/>\nmentored applied experience.  <\/p>\n<p>The (AEP) was put in place to ensure that all newly<br \/>\ndesignated members have obtained relevant experi-<br \/>\nence in the application of \u2018First Principles of value\u2019<br \/>\nin a professional setting and have acquired and<br \/>\ndeveloped the AIC required professional competen-<br \/>\ncies (market analysis, integrity, critical thinking,<br \/>\nrelationship building and communication, and<br \/>\nself-development) and professionalism expected by<br \/>\nclients and AIC.  <\/p>\n<p>The mentoring process ensures that Candidates<br \/>\nare guided in their development and in application<br \/>\nof the principles of value and professional competen-<br \/>\ncies. Candidate and mentor must enter into a men-<br \/>\ntorship agreement demonstrating how, together,<br \/>\nthey plan to work through the first principles of value<br \/>\nand competencies in a way that will ensure that <\/p>\n<p>the Candidate will be able to successfully complete<br \/>\nthe applied experience written exam and the profes-<br \/>\nsional competency interview leading to obtaining the<br \/>\ndesignation sought. <\/p>\n<p>Should a Candidate choose to sign reports a<br \/>\nco-signer is required. In many cases, a Candidate<br \/>\nco-signer also acts as a mentor, however, this is not<br \/>\nnecessary. The roles of mentoring and co-signing are<br \/>\nunique and distinct from each other, and the terms<br \/>\nshould not be used synonymously.<\/p>\n<p>According to Wikipedia, the mentor\u2019s primary<br \/>\nfunctions are to teach, give advice, and share his or her<br \/>\nexperience (breadth and depth) so that a Candidate<br \/>\nmay advance within his or her chosen career; the<br \/>\nco-signer\u2019s primary function is to act as a \u2018guarantor.\u2019<br \/>\nIt is said that the legal act of co-signing is also called a<br \/>\nguaranty (also known as a surety).<\/p>\n<p>Recently, an ad-hoc committee was established<br \/>\nby AIC\u2019s Board to investigate the issues surrounding<br \/>\ncandidacy. Some of the issues this committee will<br \/>\nbe looking at include the present co-signing policy,<br \/>\nthe co-signing registry, and geographical matters.<br \/>\nAs well, concerns of professional nature have been<br \/>\nexpressed relative to leading a client or potential<br \/>\nclient to perhaps get the impression that a Candidate<br \/>\nis a qualified professional. Other concerns are more<br \/>\nadministrative,\tsuch\tas\tthe\tdifficulties\taround\tadmin-<br \/>\nistering and monitoring the Candidate registry, while<br \/>\nothers are more related to the business practices<br \/>\nof Candidates, such as Candidates working as sole<br \/>\npractitioners.<\/p>\n<p>These are only a few of the issues that have been<br \/>\nidentified. If you have specific concerns, the ad-hoc<br \/>\ncommittee welcomes input by contacting them<br \/>\ncandidacy@aicanada.ca. <\/p>\n<p>Professional Qualifications continued<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIn all cases of extensions, the Candidate is required<br \/>\nto complete the prior year\u2019s CPY requirement PLUS <\/p>\n<p>the current year\u2019s CPY as well.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>mailto:candidacy@aicanada.ca<br \/>\nmailto:pqcc@aicanada.ca<br \/>\nhttp:\/\/www.notarius.com<\/p>\n<p>Canadian Property Valuation Volume 55 | book 2 | 2011 \u00c9valuation Immobili\u00e8re au Canada 27click here to return to table 0f contents<\/p>\n<p>Standards Committee<br \/>\nBrian varner, AACI \u2013 Chair<br \/>\nIain Hyslop, AACI<br \/>\nChris Perret, AACI<br \/>\nLouis Poirier, AACI \u2013 Board Liaison<br \/>\nTo contact this committee, email:<br \/>\nstandards@aicanada.ca<\/p>\n<p>Appraisal standards<br \/>\nfor 24-hour turnarounds<\/p>\n<p>Standards<br \/>\nBy Brian Varner, AACI<\/p>\n<p>Chair, Standards Committee<\/p>\n<p>We have all heard it said that \u201cthe more things change, the more they stay the same.\u201d For those of<br \/>\nus who are longer in the tooth than some, remem-<br \/>\nber when preparing a residential appraisal report<br \/>\nmeant, among other things, identifying the client<br \/>\nand understanding the intended use, inspecting the<br \/>\nproperty, researching and analyzing comparable<br \/>\nsales data and hand drafting an appraisal report for<br \/>\ntyping by the clerical support staff, attaching a loca-<br \/>\ntion map and exterior photographs, etc. Typically, a<br \/>\nlender client would expect to receive the report two<br \/>\nor three days after making the request, and, if you<br \/>\nwere really busy, you would negotiate for a slightly<br \/>\nlonger delivery date. <\/p>\n<p>Sometimes, a lender might call the appraiser<br \/>\nwith a genuine \u2018rush job\u2019 and even require a 24-hour<br \/>\nturnaround. As this might have occurred before the<br \/>\nintroduction of the Canadian Uniform Standards of<br \/>\nProfessional Appraisal Practice (CUSPAP), there were<br \/>\nless stringent professional practice obligations on<br \/>\nthe part of the appraiser, right? Wrong! Perhaps the<br \/>\nstandards at the time were less explicit than the<br \/>\ncurrent edition of CUSPAP, but expectations of profes-<br \/>\nsionalism were similar.<\/p>\n<p>Today, many of our residential appraisal clients,<br \/>\nincluding appraisal management companies may<br \/>\ninsist that all appraisal assignments be completed<br \/>\nand delivered within 24 hours. Of course, technologi-<br \/>\ncal advances such as computers and software, access<br \/>\nto internal and external databases, Google, and so<br \/>\nforth have all aided the appraiser in the research<br \/>\nand preparation of an appraisal report. However,<br \/>\nnowhere in the CUSPAP 2010 edition will members<br \/>\nfind\trelief\tfrom\tthe\t27\tAppraisal\tStandard\tRules\tand<br \/>\nthe\t27\tAppraisal\tStandard\tComments\tthat\tprovide<br \/>\nthe minimum performance standards and whose <\/p>\n<p>application is compulsory when completing an<br \/>\nappraisal report, even when a client insists on a<br \/>\n24-hour turnaround. <\/p>\n<p>The Appraisal Standard Rules are very straight-<br \/>\nforward and it is often helpful to review the Appraisal<br \/>\nStandard Comments that explain and elaborate on<br \/>\nthe Rules. For example, in providing an appraisal<br \/>\nreport,\tthe\tmember\tneeds\tto\tconsider\t7.3\tIntended<br \/>\nUse\tand\t7.4\tPurpose,\twherein\tthe\tComments\tstate<br \/>\nthat the appraiser must consider the client\u2019s intended<br \/>\nuse and that liability to the client may depend on the<br \/>\nappraiser\u2019s understanding of the client\u2019s intended<br \/>\nuse.\tComment\t7.5.2\tgoes\ton\tto\tsay\tthat\tthe\tscope\tof\t<\/p>\n<p>work\tapplied\tmust\tbe\tsufficient\tto\tresult\tin\topinions\/<br \/>\nconclusions that are credible in the context of the<br \/>\nintended use of the appraisal and that the burden<br \/>\nof proof to support the scope of work rests with the<br \/>\nappraiser. <\/p>\n<p>When clients commission appraisals and their<br \/>\nintended use is to rely on the report in providing<br \/>\nfinancing to a borrower, for example, it has been<br \/>\nshown time and again that it is reasonable for<br \/>\nthe client to expect that the appraiser performed<br \/>\nadequate due diligence and adhered to the mini-<br \/>\nmum appraisal standards prevailing at the time the<br \/>\nreport was completed. If a member believes that<br \/>\na credible appraisal report cannot be completed<br \/>\nwithin the requested turnaround time, say 24 hours,<br \/>\nthen it would be prudent to respectfully decline the<br \/>\nassignment. At no time should the turnaround time<br \/>\ntake on more significance than the quality of the<br \/>\nappraisal report.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, it is worth remembering that, should<br \/>\nappraisers find themselves to be the subject of a sub-<br \/>\nsequent claim from such an assignment, they would<br \/>\nhave a hollow argument indeed, if they offered that<br \/>\ninsufficient\ttime\twas\tpermitted\tto\tcomplete\ta\tcred-<br \/>\nible appraisal report. <\/p>\n<p> \u201cAt no time should the<br \/>\nturnaround time take<br \/>\non more significance <\/p>\n<p>than the quality of the<br \/>\nappraisal report.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>mailto:standards@aicanada.ca<\/p>\n<p>Canadian Property Valuation Volume 55 | book 2 | 2011 \u00c9valuation Immobili\u00e8re au Canada28 click here to return to table 0f contents<\/p>\n<p>Professional collaboration<\/p>\n<p>Investigating<br \/>\nBy Darrell Thorvaldson, AACI<\/p>\n<p>Chair, Investigating Committee<\/p>\n<p>s professionals, we strive for high<br \/>\nachievement through constant vigilance<br \/>\nand considerable effort. We work hard to <\/p>\n<p>develop and refine the effectiveness of our business<br \/>\nmodel that seeks to avoid the integration of errors<br \/>\nand strives to incorporate success. Feedback cycling<br \/>\ncan take many forms, for example, working with<br \/>\nthe Appraisal Institute of Canada (AIC) Investigating<br \/>\nCommittee (IC) through a formal complaint process<br \/>\nwith an open frame of mind may be an opportunity<br \/>\nto help you achieve higher levels of success as an<br \/>\naccomplished professional.<\/p>\n<p>The Canadian Uniform Standards of Professional<br \/>\nAppraisal Practice (CUSPAP) provides us with powerful<br \/>\ntools for producing reports that are well reasoned<br \/>\nand supported with objective substantiation. When<br \/>\ncomplaint files are received from our Counsellor,<br \/>\nProfessional Practice, the IC reviews the complaint<br \/>\nand identifies Standards issues to be discussed with<br \/>\nthe member under investigation. A culture of candor<br \/>\nis one way to deal with the issues that we bring to<br \/>\nyour attention.  <\/p>\n<p>We currently have six matters before IC. Over the<br \/>\npast year, we have seen instances of scrambling for<br \/>\nself-protection by members under investigation and<br \/>\nwe work hard to overcome the communication chal-<br \/>\nlenges that flow from them. The point to remember<br \/>\nis that, as an AIC committee, we stress collaboration,<br \/>\nrespect and support. When we reach out to you to<br \/>\nidentify either a report or an event issue, we want to<br \/>\ndiscuss what happened and the circumstances that<br \/>\nsurrounded it. We do not consider our performance<br \/>\nin carrying out our responsibilities outlined in Section<br \/>\n5 of the Consolidated Regulations as a playbook<br \/>\nintent on initiating a blaming session. Rather, we<br \/>\nwant to provide you with an opportunity to explain<br \/>\nyour side of the story.  <\/p>\n<p>When the facts are put on the table, our investi-<br \/>\ngator can talk to you about what went right or wrong<br \/>\nand, more importantly, to what degree. This context <\/p>\n<p>A<\/p>\n<p>is important in the decision-making criteria that the<br \/>\nChair-IC considers with every Investigating Report<br \/>\ncompleted by our investigator.  <\/p>\n<p>A portion of a 2010 Practice Sanction Consent<br \/>\nAgreement (PSCA) is provided below where IC<br \/>\nidentified two Standard Rule shortcomings with a<br \/>\nmember who agreed with our balanced findings<br \/>\nand reasonable discipline measures.  <\/p>\n<p>Performance under pressure can produce<br \/>\nvarying results and this example shows how the<br \/>\nmember explained his point of view, accepted<br \/>\nresponsibility and is now back on course to working<br \/>\nwithin CUSPAP.  <\/p>\n<p>Standards Rule 6.2.15: In the report, the<br \/>\nappraiser must describe and analyze all data relevant<br \/>\nto the assignment; [see 7.16]<br \/>\n 7.16 Describe and Analyze<br \/>\n 7.16.1 The appraiser must take reasonable steps to <\/p>\n<p>ensure that the information and analyses provided <\/p>\n<p>are sufficient for the client and intended users<br \/>\nto adequately understand the rationale for the<br \/>\nopinion and conclusions. <\/p>\n<p> 7.16.2 In the process of collecting and verifying<br \/>\nrelevant information, the appraiser must perform<br \/>\nthis function in a manner consistent with \u2018Reason-<br \/>\nable Appraiser\u2019 standards. All three approaches<br \/>\nrequire the collection of comparable data. The<br \/>\ndecision to inspect comparables and the extent of<br \/>\nverification of data will be determined by the scope<br \/>\nof the assignment, but, in all cases, the appraiser<br \/>\nmust conform to \u2018Reasonable Appraiser\u2019 standards.<\/p>\n<p>Investigation facts:<br \/>\nIn the report:<br \/>\n\u2022\t the\tmember\testablished\tdifferent\tprice\tranges\t<\/p>\n<p>that are not supported by the sales statistics,<br \/>\n\u2022\t the\tmember\tdid\tnot\tprovide\tsufficient\tmarket\t<\/p>\n<p>evidence to show that no adjustments were <\/p>\n<p>Canadian Property Valuation Volume 55 | book 2 | 2011 \u00c9valuation Immobili\u00e8re au Canada 29click here to return to table 0f contents<\/p>\n<p>Investigating Committee<br \/>\nDarrell Thorvaldson, AACI \u2013 Chair<br \/>\nLarry Brewer, AACI<br \/>\nStan Jugovic, AACI<br \/>\nGerry Gehlen, AACI<br \/>\nRobert Minielly, AACI<br \/>\nJoe Kireta, AACI<br \/>\nDeana Halladay, CRA<br \/>\nTo contact this committee, email:<br \/>\ninvestigating@aicanada.ca<\/p>\n<p>necessary when there were detached sales in the<br \/>\ndistrict as well as many other sales available,<\/p>\n<p>\u2022\t the\tmember\tdid\tnot\tprovide\tthe\tconstruction<br \/>\ndates of the comparables, and<\/p>\n<p>\u2022\t the\tmember\twas\tinconsistent\tin\tthe\tanalysis<br \/>\nand application of chronological or effective age<br \/>\nadjustments.<\/p>\n<p>Standards Rule 6.2.18: In the report, the appraiser<br \/>\nmust detail the reasoning supporting the analyses,<br \/>\nopinions and conclusions of each valuation approach;<br \/>\n[see 7.19] <\/p>\n<p>7.19 Reasoning<br \/>\n7.19.1 Reasoning requires the logical review, <\/p>\n<p>analyses and interpretation of the data in a manner<br \/>\nthat would support the conclusion, not mislead the<br \/>\nreader, and be to a level consistent with the \u2018Reason-<br \/>\nable Appraiser\u2019 standard.<\/p>\n<p>Investigation facts:<br \/>\nThe member:<br \/>\n\u2022\t did\tnot\tprovide\tthe\tconstruction\tdates\tof\tthe\t<\/p>\n<p>comparables,<br \/>\n\u2022\t made\tan\terror\tand\twas\tinconsistent\tin\tthe\tanaly-<\/p>\n<p>sis and application of chronological or effective<br \/>\nage adjustments, <\/p>\n<p>\u2022\t did\tnot\tprovide\tsufficient\tinformation\tto\tsupport<br \/>\nthe exposure time,<\/p>\n<p>\u2022\t applied\tinconsistent\tadjustments\twithout\tsup-<br \/>\nporting market information,<\/p>\n<p>\u2022\t did\tnot\tprovide\tsufficient\tinformation\tto\tsupport<br \/>\nthe exclusion of sales due to site size and did not<br \/>\nconsider sold properties nearby, and  <\/p>\n<p>\u2022\t did\tnot\tconsider\tsold\tproperties\tnearer\tthan\tthree<br \/>\nmiles of the subject and used assessment values<br \/>\nas a basis for disqualifying comparable sales.<\/p>\n<p>The IC wants to shore up your strengths and<br \/>\nrespectfully pinpoint where you stepped outside of<br \/>\nStandard Rules.  <\/p>\n<p>Everyone\u2019s capabilities can be lifted through<br \/>\nprofessional accountability to our clients, col-<br \/>\nlaboration with each other, and confidence in<br \/>\nour organization. No one wants to be treated less<br \/>\nfavorably than others and our investigation process<br \/>\nunderstands this.  <\/p>\n<p>If you find your name on one of our files, keep<br \/>\nthis in mind and work with our investigators.  <\/p>\n<p>If the issue that has been investigated is primar-<br \/>\nily practice oriented, then you will be getting a call<br \/>\nfrom the Chair-IC to discuss the PSCA that will be<br \/>\noffered to you.  <\/p>\n<p>You might receive a letter from the Chair-IC<br \/>\nthanking you for your good co-operation through-<br \/>\nout the investigation and advising you that the<br \/>\ninvestigation has been closed with no evidence of <\/p>\n<p>Standard Rules violations. Some helpful advice may<br \/>\naccompany this letter.  <\/p>\n<p>If the issue is found to be more serious, you will<br \/>\nbe notified that the matter has been moved from<br \/>\nthe IC to the Professional Practice Advocate. <\/p>\n<p>The AIC is an extended team, with players<br \/>\nstretching from coast to coast. With a commitment<br \/>\nto supporting each other, the AIC professional<br \/>\npractice system is there to pick up the ball that can<br \/>\ndrop from time to time.  <\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhen we reach out<br \/>\nto you to identify<br \/>\neither a report or <\/p>\n<p>an event issue, we<br \/>\nwant to discuss what <\/p>\n<p>happened and the<br \/>\ncircumstances that <\/p>\n<p>surrounded it&#8230;\u201d<\/p>\n<p>mailto:investigating@aicanada.ca<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"PR8IxTGvzT\"><p><a href=\"https:\/\/crvg.com\/\">CRVG Home<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" class=\"oembed-iframe\"  class=\"wp-embedded-content\" sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" style=\"position: absolute; clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);\" title=\"&#8220;CRVG Home&#8221; &#8212; CRVG - Canadian Resource Valuation Group\" src=\"https:\/\/crvg.com\/embed\/#?secret=CrTu00G7he#?secret=PR8IxTGvzT\" data-secret=\"PR8IxTGvzT\" width=\"500\" height=\"282\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>Canadian Property Valuation Volume 55 | book 2 | 2011 \u00c9valuation Immobili\u00e8re au Canada30 click here to return to table 0f contents<\/p>\n<p>Assuming a role of advocate<br \/>\nBy Andy Chopko, AACI<\/p>\n<p>Member, Appeal Committee<\/p>\n<p>Appeal<\/p>\n<p>T<\/p>\n<p>Appeal Committee<br \/>\nLeonard Lee, AACI \u2013 Chair<br \/>\nAllan Beatty, AACI, Fellow<br \/>\nJohn Shevchuk, Associate<br \/>\nAndrew Chopko, AACI<br \/>\nGordon J. Tomiuk, AACI, Fellow<br \/>\nTo contact this committee, email:<br \/>\nappeal@aicanada.ca<\/p>\n<p>ax appeal hearings are a primary setting<br \/>\nfor designated members taking on<br \/>\nthe roll of advocate for their client. Be <\/p>\n<p>concerned. Taxing authorities and Assessment<br \/>\nReview Boards are taking a tougher stand with<br \/>\nappraisers becoming advocates for their clients. <\/p>\n<p>In a recent tax appeal hearing involving a<br \/>\nfairly large commercial property that included<br \/>\na retail centre with ancillary development, the<br \/>\nAssessment Review Board heard an appeal<br \/>\nwhere the tax agent was an appraiser. At the<br \/>\nopening of the tax appeal hearing, the property<br \/>\nwas identified by the appraiser followed by a<br \/>\nself-introduction outlining his or her appraisal<br \/>\nexperience and how he or she was a designated<br \/>\nAIC member, but acting as a tax agent. <\/p>\n<p>During the hearing, the Board heard that<br \/>\nthere was no formal appraisal of the property<br \/>\ncompleted by the tax agent\/appraiser, but rather<br \/>\na summary of different approaches utilized in<br \/>\nthe valuation of the property, and a selection<br \/>\nof rental comparables that was also provided,<br \/>\nwhere much of the data was dated.<\/p>\n<p>As the hearing progressed, the Board heard<br \/>\nthat a method labeled by the tax agent\/appraiser<br \/>\nas a \u201cLimited Cost Approach\u201d was utilized to<br \/>\nestimate value for the subject property, and<br \/>\nlater, the Board learned under cross examination<br \/>\nthat the Limited Cost Approach was prepared<br \/>\nexcluding the ancillary development on the<br \/>\nsubject site.<\/p>\n<p>The tax agent\/appraiser further supported<br \/>\nthis Limited Cost Approach by dated rental data<br \/>\nin an Income Analysis that excluded the rental<br \/>\nincome from the ancillary development on site,<br \/>\nthereby reflecting value substantially lower than<br \/>\nthe assessed value of the subject property.<\/p>\n<p>Only through cross-examination of the<br \/>\nwitness was the omission of the ancillary<br \/>\ndevelopment noted, in what was referred to as <\/p>\n<p>a Limited Cost Approach revealing the glaring<br \/>\noversight, and, by completing this approach,<br \/>\nthe value of the property was understated. In<br \/>\ndefending the limited valuation of the subject<br \/>\nproperty, it was evident that the tax agent\/<br \/>\nappraiser became an advocate trying to influence<br \/>\nthe Board by referencing appraisal experience. <\/p>\n<p>Not only did the appeal fail, in my opinion,<br \/>\nthe reputation of the tax agent\/appraiser was<br \/>\nseverely impacted by the choice of becoming an<br \/>\nadvocate, not to mention the negative reaction<br \/>\nthat was created in the minds of Board members<br \/>\nhearing this appeal. <\/p>\n<p>A member\u2019s performance or actions in this<br \/>\nsituation can expect to be examined under the<br \/>\nfollowing provisions of the Standards:<\/p>\n<p>See Ethics Rule:<br \/>\n\u2022\t 4.2.1:\tIt\tis\tunethical\tfor\ta\tmember\tto\tknowingly\t<\/p>\n<p>fail to comply with Bylaws, Regulations and<br \/>\nStandards, and the Professional Liability<br \/>\nInsurance Program of the Institute.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022\t 4.2.1:\tIt\tis\tunethical\tfor\ta\tmember\tto\tknowingly<br \/>\nengage in conduct that will prejudice his\/<br \/>\nher professional status, the reputation of the<br \/>\nInstitute, the appraisal profession, or any other<br \/>\nmember.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022\t 4.2.3:\tIt\tis\tunethical\tfor\ta\tmember\tto\tact\tin\ta<br \/>\nmanner that is misleading.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022\t 4.2.5:\tIt\tis\tunethical\tfor\ta\tmember\tto\tcomplete<br \/>\nan assignment that a reasonable appraiser<br \/>\ncould not support. <\/p>\n<p>\u2022\t 4.2.7:\tIt\tis\tunethical\tfor\ta\tmember\tto\tundertake<br \/>\nan assignment lacking the necessary<br \/>\ncompetence.<\/p>\n<p>5.2 Conduct:<br \/>\n\u2022\t 5.2.3:\tMembers\tcannot\tavoid\ttheir\tethical\t<\/p>\n<p>responsibilities and obligations by doing<br \/>\nindirectly what they cannot do directly.<\/p>\n<p>5.3 Misleading Report:<br \/>\n\u2022\t 5.3.1:\tIt\tis\tunethical\tfor\ta\tmember\tto\tdevelop,\t<\/p>\n<p>use or permit to use, for any purpose any<br \/>\nreport which the member knows, or ought to<br \/>\nknow, is misleading.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022\t 5.3.3:\tNote:\tA\tmisleading\treport\tcan\tbe\tcaused<br \/>\nby omission or commission and may result<br \/>\nfrom a single large error or a series of small<br \/>\nerrors that, when taken in aggregate, lead to a<br \/>\nreport that is deemed to be misleading.<\/p>\n<p>This commentary is intended to illustrate the<br \/>\npotential problems that could arise if members<br \/>\nare tempted to act as an advocate. Members<br \/>\nare reminded that, when their actions are<br \/>\nfound to be in contravention of an ethics rule,<br \/>\nthese actions generally attract a higher level of<br \/>\ndiscipline, when warranted. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cTaxing authorities<br \/>\nand Assessment <\/p>\n<p>Review Boards are<br \/>\ntaking a tougher <\/p>\n<p>stand with appraisers<br \/>\nbecoming advocates <\/p>\n<p>for their clients.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>mailto:appeal@aicanada.ca<\/p>\n<p>Canadian Property Valuation Volume 55 | book 2 | 2011 \u00c9valuation Immobili\u00e8re au Canada 31click here to return to table 0f contents<\/p>\n<p>Consumer sense and sensibility<br \/>\nrobert Patchett, LL.B. <\/p>\n<p>Counsellor, Professional Practice<\/p>\n<p>From the Counsellor\u2019s Desk<\/p>\n<p> am sure no one would disagree that good<br \/>\ncustomer service is the lifeblood of any busi-<br \/>\nness \u2013 the customer is always right motto <\/p>\n<p>\u2013 but have you given some thought to applying<br \/>\nthose\tprinciples\tin\tan\tappraisal\toffice?<\/p>\n<p>If you provide professional appraisal services<br \/>\nto lenders, or to a few select clients and users,<br \/>\nshould you be concerned with good customer<br \/>\nservice when you interact with the property<br \/>\nowner, tenant, or realtor? After all, they are<br \/>\nunlikely to be paying your fee, or are unlikely to<br \/>\nreceive a copy of your report. So why care?<\/p>\n<p>I would suggest that you should take great<br \/>\ncare concerning what these people think and say<br \/>\nabout you as well as your professional demean-<br \/>\nour and how you comport yourself. Consumers<br \/>\nwill\ttell\tthe\tbanking\tofficer\tand\tmortgage\tbroker,<br \/>\ntheir family and friends, and anyone else who<br \/>\nwill listen about all the negative impressions<br \/>\nyou have created with them. However, if they<br \/>\nare convinced, and they are willing and ready to<br \/>\nbe convinced, that you are a professional who<br \/>\nprovides a valuable service to them, they will also<br \/>\nshare these favourable opinions.<\/p>\n<p>How does that look and feel? You arrive at<br \/>\nthe property, knock on the door, and introduce<br \/>\nyourself: \u201cGood day, I am Jayne, I am here from<br \/>\nthe ACME Appraisal Company, on behalf of The<br \/>\nGreat Canadian Lender, to conduct an appraisal of<br \/>\nyour property for them. May I come in?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Right there you have identified yourself, your<br \/>\nfirm and the lender that retained you to conduct <\/p>\n<p>I the valuation. Next, of course, you should provide them with a business card, or even display your AIC membership card.<br \/>\nYou then explain the process and confirm <\/p>\n<p>that you have permission to continue: \u201cIn order<br \/>\nto complete the valuation, I would appreciate it<br \/>\nif you could escort me throughout your property,<br \/>\nboth inside and outside. At this time, I will be<br \/>\ntaking some notes and photographs that the<br \/>\nlender would like to see included in my report<br \/>\nand I will take exterior measurements of the<br \/>\nbuilding to confirm the size.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>At this point, you have asked for and hope-<br \/>\nfully received permission to take photographs<br \/>\nand explained that everything you are doing is<br \/>\npart of the valuation process and the gathering of<br \/>\ninformation that the lender has requested.  <\/p>\n<p>Here the consumer may ask you some<br \/>\nquestions and it is very important that you are<br \/>\nprepared to respond appropriately. \u201cHow soon<br \/>\nwill your report be completed and submitted to<br \/>\nthe lender?\u201d \u201cCan you provide me with a copy?\u201d<br \/>\n\u201cCan you give me an indication of what you think<br \/>\nthe value is?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In this regard, I hear from lenders that this is<br \/>\nwhere they have some reservations about how<br \/>\nappraisers have been responding. Ideally, I would<br \/>\nsuggest something like this: \u201cI will complete my<br \/>\nreport by the end of the day today or tomorrow<br \/>\nat the latest, and it will be submitted to the<br \/>\nlender through their appraisal management<br \/>\ncompany. Since this is done via the Internet, the <\/p>\n<p>lender should see the report fairly quickly. The<br \/>\nlender has indicated that you may obtain a copy<br \/>\nby speaking with your lender representative<br \/>\nor\tby\tcontacting\tthe\tlender\u2019s\tPrivacy\tOfficer.\tI<br \/>\nwould not be able to comment on the value until<br \/>\nI complete my research, including the tour  on<br \/>\nwhich you have so kindly agreed to escort me.<br \/>\nIf you have any questions, I am sure the lender\u2019s<br \/>\nrepresentative that you have been dealing with<br \/>\ncan assist you.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The key here is that you must maintain<br \/>\nclient confidentiality regarding your opinions<br \/>\nand conclusions and point them in the right<br \/>\ndirection to have their questions answered.<\/p>\n<p>If all goes well, your property tour is<br \/>\nsmoother, your report is complete, and the<br \/>\nconsumer is left feeling assured that their<br \/>\nlender \u2013 The Great Canadian Lender \u2013 has<br \/>\nretained professional valuers. This they will tell<br \/>\ntheir friends and bridge partners!<\/p>\n<p>Someday in the not too distant future,<br \/>\nbecause you provided your business card, you<br \/>\nwill get a call from the consumer asking you to<br \/>\nprovide some professional appraisal services<br \/>\nin support of a tax appeal, or other litigation or<br \/>\nunique assignment for which your usual and<br \/>\ncustomary fees can be negotiated.<\/p>\n<p>The bottom line is that consumer satisfac-<br \/>\ntion will keep your lender clients happy and<br \/>\nmore work will indubitably come your way,<br \/>\neither by increased volume or word of mouth<br \/>\nreferrals. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cConsumer satisfaction will keep your lender clients happy and more<br \/>\nwork will indubitably come your way, either by increased volume or word <\/p>\n<p>of mouth referrals.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Canadian Property Valuation Volume 55 | book 2 | 2011 \u00c9valuation Immobili\u00e8re au Canada32 click here to return to table 0f contents<\/p>\n<p>Google Earth is an invaluable<br \/>\ntool for valuation professionals<\/p>\n<p>By Jeff Godfrey, AACI<br \/>\nStrand &#038; Godfrey Appraisals Ltd.<\/p>\n<p>Castlegar, British Columbia<\/p>\n<p>Technology<\/p>\n<p>Aerial photography and cadastral mapping have made appraisal work more precise and detailed and have<br \/>\nimproved the quality of analysis. You can locate,<br \/>\nselect, and investigate right at your desktop,<br \/>\nfrom a variety of sources. More and more,<br \/>\ncities, provincial and federal bodies, and private<br \/>\nsuppliers are producing sophisticated mapping<br \/>\ntools with multiple layers that go beyond just<br \/>\northophotos and cadastre information. But, in<br \/>\nour practice, geographic information systems<br \/>\n(GIS) data and images are almost always used<br \/>\nin conjunction with Google Earth.<\/p>\n<p>There are several versions of Google Earth<br \/>\navailable to the user. There is the free version,<br \/>\nGoogle Earth Pro and Google Earth Enterprise.<br \/>\nFor us, the free version did not have all the<br \/>\nfeatures we needed, so, a few years ago, we<br \/>\nupgraded to Pro. At $399 US\/year, it is not<br \/>\ninexpensive, but if you use it every day, it<br \/>\ncan be a bargain. The Pro version gives you<br \/>\n\u2018fastest\u2019 performance, highest image print<br \/>\nand save resolution, email support and the<br \/>\nvery important ability to measure area. But<br \/>\nperhaps most critical is the license to reproduce<br \/>\ncontent for external purposes, including \u2018screen<br \/>\ncaptures from Google Earth in reports and<br \/>\npresentations or otherwise creating materials<br \/>\nthat will be displayed or distributed outside of<br \/>\nyour organization.\u2019 We use many Google Earth<br \/>\nimages in our reports, from standard overhead<br \/>\naerials with overlays to tilted terrain images<br \/>\nand street view photos. So, what is the big deal<br \/>\nwith Google Earth? Here is a list of the top uses<br \/>\nfor valuation professionals:<\/p>\n<p>Measure distances. You can use the ruler<br \/>\nto measure distance or paths \u2018as the crow flies.\u2019 <\/p>\n<p>Or, drop a place mark (the yellow pin) at the<br \/>\nproperty, another at the second location, right<br \/>\nclick on one and choose \u2018directions from here,\u2019<br \/>\nright click on the other and choose \u2018directions<br \/>\nto here.\u2019 Google Earth will draw the route (by<br \/>\nroad) and tell you the distance to the tenth of a<br \/>\nkm. No more guessing or clocking in your car.<br \/>\nThis is available with the free version.<\/p>\n<p>Measure area. How much of Property A is<br \/>\nhillside, cleared, paved, landscaped, fenced,<br \/>\nsplit zoned, or bisected by a road? Measure<br \/>\nit using the ruler tools or create a polygon<br \/>\nand query the area. How big is that industrial<br \/>\nbuilding that sold last year? Measure it to<br \/>\ndetermine if it warrants closer scrutiny as a<br \/>\ncomparable. This is available only with Google<br \/>\nEarth Pro.<\/p>\n<p>Create polygons.This is useful for illustrating<br \/>\nthe boundaries of a property or any other<br \/>\ndefined area. In the Pro version, you can see the<br \/>\narea of each polygon without using the other<br \/>\nmeasuring tools.<\/p>\n<p>Record a \u2018video\u2019 of any route or navigation<br \/>\nwithin Google Earth. You can tilt, rotate, zoom,<br \/>\nmove locations and record it all to share with<br \/>\na client. <\/p>\n<p>Overlay images. We overlay subdivision plans,<br \/>\nplot plans, zoning maps, engineering drawings,<br \/>\nhigher resolution aerial photos, etc. If you are<br \/>\nlucky enough to have a third party provide such<br \/>\nan image or data as a geo-referenced file, all you<br \/>\ndo is open it with Google Earth and it takes you to<br \/>\nthe accurately placed overlay. (Only Google Earth<br \/>\nPro can import non-Google Earth format GIS files.) <\/p>\n<p>If you must create your own overlay and are not a<br \/>\nGIS expert, you will have to \u2018rubbersheet\u2019 an image<br \/>\nby placing and sizing it to your location. Once the<br \/>\noverlay is placed, you can add other overlays and<br \/>\nfade any to partial transparency so that information<br \/>\nfor multiple overlays can be seen on one image.<br \/>\nHere is a screenshot of a single, rubbersheeted<br \/>\noverlay. This is available with both versions with<br \/>\nvarying functionality.<\/p>\n<p>Analyze sun exposure at a particular location<br \/>\nfor any hour or day of the year. Do you suspect<br \/>\nthat direct sunlight on the north side of that<br \/>\nvalley is limited in the winter? Advanced users<br \/>\ncan even cast shadows of 3D building mockups. <\/p>\n<p>Street View. They say a picture is worth a<br \/>\nthousand words. Are you conducting an appraisal<br \/>\nof a regional type of property, but cannot drive<br \/>\nhundreds of kms to see if a comparable is suitable<br \/>\nor to photograph it? We often rely on trading<br \/>\ndata with other appraisers in and outside of our<br \/>\nregion. Many email us very detailed information, <\/p>\n<p>Canadian Property Valuation Volume 55 | book 2 | 2011 \u00c9valuation Immobili\u00e8re au Canada 33click here to return to table 0f contents<\/p>\n<p>but some are still faxing or do not collect photos<br \/>\nfor their database. Type in the address of the<br \/>\nproperty and Google Earth takes you there.<br \/>\nIf they have recorded street view data at that<br \/>\nlocation, you can enter this layer and it is like<br \/>\nbeing there. This is available with both versions. <\/p>\n<p>Display GPS tracks\/waypoints and<br \/>\ngeo-tagged photos. Importing directly<br \/>\nfrom your GPS into Google Earth or using<br \/>\nthird party software, you can display your GPS<br \/>\ninspection tracks. If your camera and GPS are<br \/>\ntime synched, you can show the location of<br \/>\neach photo taken. GPS tracks are helpful for<br \/>\nyour own reference for keeping track of lengthy<br \/>\ninspections on large or multiple properties or<br \/>\nto clearly illustrate the scope of your inspection.<br \/>\nGeo-tagging photos allows you to display an<br \/>\naerial image key map for a reader to reference<br \/>\nthe photos in your report. (Note: watch for<br \/>\nmore on geo-tagging in a future column.) <\/p>\n<p>View historic aerial imagery. Many<br \/>\nlocations have multiple images available to<br \/>\nGoogle Earth. The image date is displayed and<br \/>\na slider allows you to scroll through time. Here<br \/>\nare the former Expo 86 lands in vancouver in<br \/>\n2000, 2003 and 2010.<\/p>\n<p>real time, in your car. This is useful if you have loaded<br \/>\npolygons or place marks of subject or comparable data<br \/>\nyou are currently inspecting. When the mobile version<br \/>\nof Google Earth has some of the functionality of the PC<br \/>\nversion, this feature can go portable. What a field tool<br \/>\nthat will be. <\/p>\n<p>Load and display third party layers. The<br \/>\nfederal government has an interesting site for Google<br \/>\nEarth layers for federal lands. But, BC seems to be at<br \/>\nthe forefront of Google Earth integration. There are<br \/>\nliterally dozens of usable layers available at (http:\/\/<br \/>\narchive.ilmb.gov.bc.ca\/dm\/wms\/index.html),<br \/>\nincluding the very important cadastre layer, contour<br \/>\nlines and municipal and agricultural land reserve<br \/>\nboundaries. Some municipalities (see Nanaimo, BC)<br \/>\nhave also integrated well with Google Earth and I<br \/>\nhope more will follow. <\/p>\n<p>Organize, save and share all your overlays,<br \/>\npolygons, place marks, GPS tracks, geo-tagged photos<br \/>\nand 3D buildings within Google Earth. Save them to<br \/>\nyour digital work file or email them to another user.<br \/>\nAn emailed Google Earth file of any of these types will<br \/>\nopen automatically in another user\u2019s Google Earth.<\/p>\n<p>For us, integration and the ease of viewing, saving<br \/>\nand sharing makes Google Earth a platform that<br \/>\nis central to geo-spatial information analysis \u2013 an<br \/>\nincreasingly important field for appraisers. With<br \/>\nGoogle\u2019s vast economic clout, it is likely that third party<br \/>\nservices will continue to develop for Google Earth and<br \/>\nuses for the software will expand. Every new version<br \/>\nof the tool has come with terrific upgrades and I am<br \/>\nexpecting that to continue. If you do not have it,<br \/>\ndownload the free version or try a free trial of Pro.<br \/>\nWrite to us at this column (tech@aicanada.ca) and<br \/>\nI will send you some actual Google Earth files that I<br \/>\nhave created and used. <\/p>\n<p>NOTE:<br \/>\nAIC has embraced Jeff Godfrey\u2019s offer to write this regular technology column for CPV magazine.  <\/p>\n<p>AIC appreciates this initiative to help keep members informed about ongoing technology developments and their application in the valuation profession.<\/p>\n<p>Members are invited to contact tech@aicanada.ca with their ideas on this topic or to share their experiences with new technologies.<\/p>\n<p>Navigate in Google Earth in real time Not<br \/>\ntoo many handheld GPS units allow you to import<br \/>\naerial photos yet. But, if you connect your GPS to a<br \/>\nlaptop with a cellular connection, you can navigate in <\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/archive.ilmb.gov.bc.ca\/dm\/wms\/index.html<br \/>\nhttp:\/\/archive.ilmb.gov.bc.ca\/dm\/wms\/index.html<br \/>\nmailto:tech@aicanada.ca<br \/>\nmailto:tech@aicanada.ca<\/p>\n<p>Canadian Property Valuation Volume 55 | book 2 | 2011 \u00c9valuation Immobili\u00e8re au Canada34 click here to return to table 0f contents<\/p>\n<p>Candidates \u2013 staying on<br \/>\ntrack with a course per year<\/p>\n<p>S<\/p>\n<p>Learning Advisory<br \/>\nBy erica Giesbrecht,  Candidate<\/p>\n<p>Member, Learning Advisory Committee<\/p>\n<p>elf-regulating, professional organizations<br \/>\nsuch as the Appraisal Institute of Canada<br \/>\n(AIC) play an important role in helping <\/p>\n<p>their members to maintain the most up-to-date<br \/>\neducation and skills to offer their clients. To this<br \/>\nend, policies are commonly used to encourage<br \/>\nboth Candidates and designated members to<br \/>\ncontinue learning and to engage themselves in<br \/>\nthe industry and profession through activities such<br \/>\nas mentoring, completing courses, and attending<br \/>\nconferences, to name a few.<\/p>\n<p>In pursuing either of the CRA or AACI des-<br \/>\nignations, Candidate members of the AIC are to<br \/>\nsuccessfully complete a list of education require-<\/p>\n<p>ments in addition to their experience. In October<br \/>\n2005, a policy was approved which requires the<br \/>\ncompletion of at least one university credit course<br \/>\neach year, between October 1 and September 30.<br \/>\nThe minimum requirements to fulfil the Course<br \/>\nPer Year (CPY) criteria are that the course:<br \/>\n\u2022\t be\toffered\tby\ta\trecognized\tuniversity\tor\tcollege\t<\/p>\n<p>in Canada;<br \/>\n\u2022\t count\ttoward\ta\tfour-year\tbachelor\u2019s\tdegree\tor\t<\/p>\n<p>a master\u2019s degree;<br \/>\n\u2022\t be\tof\ta\tlength\tconsistent\twith\ta\tone-semester\t<\/p>\n<p>university course;<br \/>\n\u2022\t be\tof\tsufficient\tdepth,\tbreadth\tand\trigor\tto\t<\/p>\n<p>meet recognized university or college four-year <\/p>\n<p>undergraduate or masters degree require-<br \/>\nments; and<\/p>\n<p>\u2022\t have\ta\tformal\tassessment\tmechanism,\tinclud-<br \/>\ning proctored mid-term examinations, final<br \/>\nexaminations or independently completed<br \/>\ncase studies.<\/p>\n<p>All courses must meet these minimum require-<br \/>\nments. Once all education requirements have<br \/>\nbeen fulfilled, including the BUSI 399\/499 Guided<br \/>\nCase Study, the Candidate will be exempt from<br \/>\nthe CPY requirement on the condition that his or<br \/>\nher desired designation is obtained within the<br \/>\nfollowing three years. <\/p>\n<p>The Institute continues to effectively com-<br \/>\nmunicate the CPY requirement in order that<br \/>\nCandidates can more easily understand how<br \/>\nto report courses, the types of courses that will<br \/>\nsatisfy the requirement, and the circumstances<br \/>\nthat would qualify a Candidate for an exemption<br \/>\nfor a given reporting period. In the Candidate<br \/>\nsection of the AIC website, a more detailed<br \/>\ndescription of the CPY Policy is available, as well<br \/>\nas an FAQ section. Also online is a  decision-tree<br \/>\n(see illustration on page 25) which illustrates<br \/>\nwhat is or is not acceptable. Should a course<br \/>\nnot meet one or more of these requirements,<br \/>\npre-approval can be obtained from the AIC prior<br \/>\nto enrolling to ensure that it is eligible for CPY<br \/>\nacceptance. Typically, requests for CPY approval<br \/>\nmust be supported by detailed course outlines<br \/>\nshowing topics covered, study materials used,<br \/>\nand assessment mechanisms.<\/p>\n<p>Courses must be reported prior to September<br \/>\n30 each year and can be reported at any time<br \/>\nin the members\u2019 section of the AIC website.<br \/>\nTo facilitate this reporting process, the AIC<br \/>\nhas developed a web-based tool that allows <\/p>\n<p>Course Per Year backgrounder<br \/>\nIn 2004, the AIC launched the New Horizons initiative which aimed to address the Institute\u2019s<br \/>\nstrategic objectives including: <\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe members of our Institute will be professionals who are recognized as having expertise and<br \/>\nintegrity to:<br \/>\n&#8211;  provide a broad range of services related to the principles of value in real estate; and<br \/>\n&#8211;  lead projects, initiatives and organizations related to property; and<br \/>\n &#8211;  provide support, strategic advice and decisions regarding real estate and related property.\u201d  <\/p>\n<p>An undergraduate degree was established as a requirement for the AACI designation in 1998 and<br \/>\nthis was extended as a requirement for the CRA designation beginning in 2006. Further, a regulation<br \/>\nwas created whereby all Candidates who joined the Institute on or after January 1, 2006 would<br \/>\nhave a maximum of 10 years from the date of admission to candidacy to complete all education,<br \/>\ncurriculum and experience requirements to obtain their designation. <\/p>\n<p>In 2004, the AIC database showed that 46% of Candidate members had joined the Institute prior to<br \/>\n1998 and were not progressing toward an AIC designation. In order to help ensure that all Candidate<br \/>\nmembers were working towards a professional designation in a steadfast manner and would achieve<br \/>\ndesignation within the required 10 years, a policy was put in place such that Candidates were no longer<br \/>\nrequired to participate in the CPD program. Instead, they would be required to complete at a minimum<br \/>\none university credit course per year in order to remain members in good standing. <\/p>\n<p>Canadian Property Valuation Volume 55 | book 2 | 2011 \u00c9valuation Immobili\u00e8re au Canada 35click here to return to table 0f contents<\/p>\n<p>Spotlight on Continuing Professional Development<\/p>\n<p>FEED YOUR FUTURE<br \/>\nwith CPD FRIDAYS<\/p>\n<p>he UBC Real Estate Division continues its<br \/>\nseries of live online webinars on Friday,<br \/>\nJune 3, 2011, from 9 am-11 am Pacific <\/p>\n<p>time (12 pm-2 pm Eastern time). The webinar is a<br \/>\ntwo-hour presentation by an expert instructor, in an<br \/>\ninteractive online classroom. By attending the session<br \/>\nand completing two hours of pre-reading on your<br \/>\nown, you will receive four AIC CPD credit hours. There<br \/>\nis no quiz or exam required to receive these credits.<\/p>\n<p>Consider these two upcoming webinars in<br \/>\nthe UBC Real Estate Division\u2019s CPD Fridays series.<br \/>\nFeed Your Future!<\/p>\n<p>CPD 106: Multi-Family Property Valuation<br \/>\nPresented June 3, 2011 by April Green, AACI &#038;<br \/>\nMichael Oord, AACI of Grover Elliot &#038; Co. Ltd.<\/p>\n<p>You will find this course informative if you are unfa-<br \/>\nmiliar with the appraisal of multi-family residential <\/p>\n<p>properties or want a refresher.<br \/>\nAppraising multi-family residential properties <\/p>\n<p>is a common assignment for many commercial real<br \/>\nestate appraisers. varied property types include<br \/>\nconverted homes, three- and four-plexes, and low-<br \/>\nrise and high-rise apartments, and ownership may<br \/>\nbe fee simple, leasehold, or strata. However, these<br \/>\nare all valued with the three common approaches to<br \/>\nvalue: direct comparison, cost, and income.  <\/p>\n<p>The highest and best use of a multi-family<br \/>\napartment property determines the nature of the<br \/>\nvaluation research and analysis program. If the<br \/>\nproperty is an income-producing investment prop-<br \/>\nerty, the income approach is usually predominant,<br \/>\nwith the direct comparison approach relied on for<br \/>\ncorroboration. If highest and best use is subdivision<br \/>\nand sale of individual strata units, the primary valu-<br \/>\nation technique is direct comparison, with the cost<br \/>\napproach relied on for corroboration. <\/p>\n<p>For income analysis, the appraiser must<br \/>\nestimate market rents and expenses and evalu-<br \/>\nate management. For smaller properties, where<br \/>\ndata\tinvolving\toperating\texpenses\tis\tdifficult\tto<br \/>\nascertain and where management practices vary<br \/>\nconsiderably, the appraiser may elect to utilize<br \/>\nincome multipliers.  <\/p>\n<p>The direct comparison approach requires veri-<br \/>\nfied data on comparable projects and must use the<br \/>\nunits of comparison relied on by market partici-<br \/>\npants. For an income-producing building, these<br \/>\nare usually price per suite, price per room, and price<br \/>\nper square foot or metre of net or gross suite area.<br \/>\nWhere condominium units are to be sold, the usual<br \/>\nunits of comparison are price per suite, price per<br \/>\nsquare metre or foot of saleable area, and price per<br \/>\nsquare metre or foot of strata lot.<\/p>\n<p>A cost-based analysis is important to test<br \/>\nfeasibility for proposed construction. The cost <\/p>\n<p>T<\/p>\n<p>Candidates to report their CPY details and upload<br \/>\nthe required supporting documents. Acceptable<br \/>\nsupporting documentation includes:<br \/>\n\u2022\t a\tcopy\tof\tstudent\tcourse\thistory,\twhich\tis\t<\/p>\n<p>comparable\tto\tan\tunofficial\ttranscript,\tshow-<br \/>\ning the completed courses and grades; or<\/p>\n<p>\u2022\t a\tcopy\tof\tstudent\t\u2018grade\tletters,\u2019\twhich\tshow<br \/>\nthe grade in each individual course; or<\/p>\n<p>\u2022\t a\tcopy\tof\tan\telectronic\ttranscript.<br \/>\nIt is important that Candidates understand <\/p>\n<p>the importance of reporting course progress<br \/>\nand\/or completion prior to September 30 of each<br \/>\nyear, and that failure to comply with the CPY<br \/>\nrequirement comes with consequences: a fine <\/p>\n<p>in the amount of $500 and suspension<br \/>\nof their Candidate status until they report<br \/>\nthe successful completion of the course per<br \/>\nyear. Members are randomly audited each year<br \/>\n(for verification of courses posted) by the AIC<br \/>\nnational\toffice.\tIf\ta\tmember\tintentionally\tenters<br \/>\na course on the CPY web-tool without having<br \/>\ntaken the courses, that member will be referred<br \/>\nto Professional Practice for their consideration.<\/p>\n<p>Exception requests should be forwarded to Man-<br \/>\nager, Professional Affairs at courseaudit@aicanada.ca.<br \/>\nShould you have any questions regarding this<br \/>\nprocess, please forward them by email to<br \/>\ncourseaudit@aicanada.ca. <\/p>\n<p>Learning Advisory Committee<br \/>\nJohn Clark, AACI \u2013 Chair<br \/>\nClifford Smirl, AACI<br \/>\nPeter MacLellan, AACI<br \/>\nErica Giesbrecht, Candidate<br \/>\nJohn Bridal, UBC<br \/>\nAndre Gravelle, UBC<br \/>\nSigne Holstein, ED, AIC \u2013 ON<br \/>\nDavid Shum, AACI \u2013 Board Liaison<br \/>\nTo contact this committee, email:<br \/>\nlac@aicanada.ca<\/p>\n<p>mailto:courseaudit@aicanada.ca<br \/>\nmailto:courseaudit@aicanada.ca<br \/>\nmailto:lac@aicanada.ca<\/p>\n<p>Canadian Property Valuation Volume 55 | book 2 | 2011 \u00c9valuation Immobili\u00e8re au Canada36 click here to return to table 0f contents<\/p>\n<p>approach is valid as a test of market value when reli-<br \/>\nable estimates of land value and construction costs<br \/>\nexist\tand\tsufficient\tmarket\tevidence\texists\tto\tpermit<br \/>\na reliable estimation of depreciation.  <\/p>\n<p>This course also explores location, design, and<br \/>\nconstruction factors that influence multi-family<br \/>\nproperty value. Combining these with market analysis,<br \/>\na series of practical case studies will illustrate the<br \/>\nvaluation process and how to conclude appropriately<br \/>\nsupported valuation estimates.<\/p>\n<p>CPD 104: Hotel Valuation<br \/>\nPresented June 3, 2011 by Betsy MacDonald, AACI &#038;<br \/>\nCarrie Russell, AACI of HVS International<\/p>\n<p>Hotels, as both real estate investments and on-going<br \/>\nbusinesses, are tricky properties to appraise. A hotel<br \/>\nis largely real estate (land and improvements).<br \/>\nHowever, there are also going-concern issues, as<br \/>\nwell as the furniture, fixtures, and equipment. If a<br \/>\nhotel is not furnished, there are no beds to sell, and,<br \/>\ntherefore, no income. Furthermore, the need to resell <\/p>\n<p>every room on a nightly basis makes hotel properties<br \/>\nextremely vulnerable to numerous variables that<br \/>\nimpact a hotel\u2019s ability to generate income. Unlike<br \/>\noffice\tbuildings,\tshopping\tcentres,\tand\tindustrial<br \/>\nwarehouses, a hotel typically has no long-term<br \/>\nleases and, therefore, can be immediately affected by<br \/>\nnew supply or a down-turn in demand.  <\/p>\n<p>The three traditional methods used to value real<br \/>\nestate still apply. Hotels are commonly bought and<br \/>\nsold on their ability to generate income. Therefore,<br \/>\nthe majority of hotels and motels are most appropri-<br \/>\nately valued via the income approach, because they<br \/>\nare purchased as income producing investments.<br \/>\nSome smaller motels and bed and breakfasts<br \/>\nmay be more appropriately valued via the direct<br \/>\ncomparison approach because, due to size, they are<br \/>\nrelatively uneconomical operations and primarily<br \/>\nserve to provide employment for the owner and his<br \/>\nor her family. <\/p>\n<p>The truism about appraisal being as much an art<br \/>\nas a science is particularly true for hotel valuation. A<br \/>\ndefensible conclusion requires substantial research <\/p>\n<p>and analysis. However, appraisers must be cautious<br \/>\nwhen analyzing hotel market data. For example,<br \/>\nhotel assets may be purchased for motivational rea-<br \/>\nsons\tthat\tare\tdifficult\tto\tquantify,\taffecting\tderived<br \/>\ncapitalization rates. Educated assumptions must<br \/>\nbe made on occupancy, average room rates and all<br \/>\nother revenue and expenses. If an appraiser is overly<br \/>\naggressive on one or more of these assumptions,<br \/>\nthen a hotel value may be significantly overstated,<br \/>\nand the reverse would be true if the appraiser were<br \/>\nto be conservative. <\/p>\n<p>This course introduces hotel appraisal, examin-<br \/>\ning the reliability of each of the three approaches to<br \/>\nvalue and the supply and demand factors that affect<br \/>\na hotel\u2019s income producing potential. Included is a<br \/>\ndetailed case study that demonstrates application<br \/>\nof the income approach (discounted cash flow) and<br \/>\ndirect comparison approach.<\/p>\n<p>For more information on these and other UBC<br \/>\nCPD offerings, please visit our website:<br \/>\nwww.realestate.ubc.ca\/webinar or<br \/>\nwww.realestate.ubc.ca\/cpd  <\/p>\n<p>OUr COnCern FOr ThE EnVIRonmEnT<br \/>\nIS MORE tHAN juSt tALk<\/p>\n<p>As we continue to deliver valuable information through the pages of this magazine, in a<br \/>\nprinted format that is appealing, reader-friendly and not lost in the proliferation of electronic<br \/>\nmessages that are bombarding our senses, we are also well aware of the need to be respectful<br \/>\nof our environment. That is why we are committed to publishing the magazine in the most<br \/>\nenvironmentally-friendly process possible. Here is what we mean:<\/p>\n<p>  We use lighter publication stock that consists of recycled paper. This paper has been certified<br \/>\nto meet the environmental and social standards of the Forest Stewardship Council\u00ae (FSC\u00ae) and <\/p>\n<p>comes from responsibly managed forests, and verified recycled sources making this a reneWABLe and<br \/>\nSUSTAInABLe resource.<\/p>\n<p>  Our computer-to-plate technology reduces the amount of chemistry required to create plates for the printing<br \/>\nprocess. The resulting chemistry is neutralized to the extent that it can be safely discharged to the drain.<\/p>\n<p>  We use vegetable oil-based inks to print the magazine. This means that we are not using resource-depleting<br \/>\npetroleum-based ink products and that the subsequent recycling of the paper in this magazine is much more <\/p>\n<p>environment friendly.<\/p>\n<p>  During the printing process, we use a solvent recycling system that separates the water from the recovered solvents<br \/>\n     and leaves only about 5% residue. This results in reduced solvent usage, handling and hazardous hauling.  <\/p>\n<p>  We ensure that an efficient recycling program is used for all printing plates and all waste paper.<\/p>\n<p>  Within the pages of each issue, we actively encourage our readers to REUSE and RECYCLE.<\/p>\n<p>So enjoy this magazine&#8230;and keeP thinking green.<\/p>\n<p>Learning Advisory continued<\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/www.realestate.ubc.ca\/webinar<br \/>\nhttp:\/\/www.realestate.ubc.ca\/cpd<\/p>\n<p>UBC Real Estate Division <\/p>\n<p>Professional Development Courses        www.realestate.ubc.ca          <\/p>\n<p> Contact Us<br \/>\n Toll-free:  1.877.775.7733 Email:  cpd@realestate.sauder.ubc.ca<br \/>\n Fax:  604.822.1900 Web:  www.realestate.ubc.ca<\/p>\n<p>the UnIversIty of brItIsh ColUmbIa<\/p>\n<p>Topics offered include:<\/p>\n<p> \u2022 Valuing Green Properties: Residential and Commercial<br \/>\n \u2022 Financial Reporting: Real Property Appraisal and IFRS<br \/>\n \u2022 Requests for Proposals (RFPs) \u2013 Winning Strategies<br \/>\n \u2022 Exposure &#038; Marketing Time: Valuation Impacts<br \/>\n \u2022 Adjustment Support in the Direct Comparison Approach<br \/>\n \u2022 Residential Appraisal Basics  \/ Commercial Appraisal Basics<br \/>\n \u2022 Valuation of Property Impairments and Contamination<br \/>\n \u2022 Speciality Valuation: Agricultural, Multi-Family, Business <\/p>\n<p>Enterprise, Submerged Land, Hotel, Office, Seniors Facilities,<br \/>\nMachinery and Equipment Valuation <\/p>\n<p> \u2022 Creative Critical Thinking<br \/>\n \u2022 Decision Analysis<br \/>\n \u2022 Highest and Best Use Analysis<br \/>\n \u2022 Appraisal Review<br \/>\n \u2022 Lease Analysis<br \/>\n \u2022 Urban Infrastructure<br \/>\n \u2022 Expropriation Valuation<\/p>\n<p>Today\u2019s successful real estate professional is creative, analytical, adaptable, and committed to lifelong<br \/>\nlearning. The Real Estate Division at UBC\u2019s Sauder School of Business offers a series of short online<br \/>\nprofessional development courses aimed at real estate practitioners\u2019 continuing education needs. <\/p>\n<p>All UBC Real Estate Division continuing professional development (CPD) courses are offered through<br \/>\ndistance education in a self-study format or as a live online webinar. Completion of a CPD course will<br \/>\nearn you a UBC award of completion, plus guaranteed credits towards the Appraisal Institute of Canada\u2019s<br \/>\nContinuing Professional Development (AIC CPD) requirements.<\/p>\n<p>To find out more, visit www.realestate.ubc.ca\/cpd<\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/www.realestate.ubc.ca<br \/>\nmailto:cpd@realestate.sauder.ubc.ca<br \/>\nhttp:\/\/www.realestate.ubc.ca<br \/>\nhttp:\/\/www.realestate.ubc.ca\/cpd<br \/>\nhttp:\/\/www.realestate.ubc.ca<\/p>\n<p>Canadian Property Valuation Volume 55 | book 2 | 2011 \u00c9valuation Immobili\u00e8re au Canada38 click here to return to table 0f contents<\/p>\n<p>Designations\/Candidates\/Students<\/p>\n<p>The Appraisal Institute of Canada (AIC), together with the provincial associations and the provincial bodies affiliated with the AIC, commend the following<br \/>\nmembers who completed the rigorous requirements for accreditation as a designated member of the AIC during the period January 22 to April 15 &#8211; 2011:<\/p>\n<p>L\u2019Institut canadien des \u00e9valuateurs (ICE), en collaboration avec les associations provinciales et les organismes provinciaux affili\u00e9s \u00e0 l\u2019ICE, f\u00e9licitent les membres<br \/>\nsuivants qui ont compl\u00e9t\u00e9 le programme rigoureux d\u2019accr\u00e9ditation \u00e0 titre de membre d\u00e9sign\u00e9 de l\u2019ICE durant la p\u00e9riode du 22  janvier au 15 avril, 2011:<\/p>\n<p>aiC designations granted \/ D\u00e9signations obtenues de l\u2019ICE<\/p>\n<p>Candidates \/ Stagiaires<br \/>\nAIC welcomed the following new Candidate members during the period January 22 to April 15 &#8211; 2011:<\/p>\n<p>L\u2019ICE souhaite la bienvenue aux personnes suivantes qui ont joint les rangs des membres stagiaires durant la p\u00e9riode du 22  janvier, au 15 avril, 2011:<\/p>\n<p>ALbERtA<br \/>\nKelly M Amestica<br \/>\nStephanie Bird<br \/>\nGeorge Selimos<br \/>\nChunsen Yang<br \/>\nKathryn Yorkston<\/p>\n<p>bRItISH COLuMbIA<br \/>\nSara Cantin<br \/>\nTomas Hala<br \/>\nJohn Ly<br \/>\nIsaac Morgan<br \/>\nSaki Murachi<br \/>\nAdeleen Seeto<br \/>\nKatie Snell<\/p>\n<p>MANItObA<br \/>\nHarpinder (Harvey) Aulakh<br \/>\nPatrick L Dyck<br \/>\nNancy Flockton<br \/>\nCherie Langston<br \/>\nTanya E Sharpe<br \/>\nRod Slaughter<\/p>\n<p>NOVA SCOtIA<br \/>\nGary Mailman<br \/>\nHeather Zwicker<\/p>\n<p>ONtARIO<br \/>\nAruchunan Aravinthan<br \/>\nStanislav Artynski<br \/>\nMandeep S Bhatia<br \/>\nSamantsinh Chauhan<br \/>\nJenny Anne Daly<br \/>\nPaul Dombrow<\/p>\n<p>Students \/ \u00c9tudiants<br \/>\nThis category of membership serves as the first step on the path to designation for those completing their requirements for Candidate membership.<br \/>\nStudents considering the appraisal profession as a career option are also welcomed to this category of membership.<\/p>\n<p>Cette cat\u00e9gorie de membre  constitue la premi\u00e8re \u00e9tape sur la voie de la d\u00e9signation pour ceux qui s\u2019affairent \u00e0 compl\u00e9ter les exigences de la cat\u00e9gorie de membre stagiaire.<br \/>\nLes \u00e9tudiants qui contemplent une carri\u00e8re comme \u00e9valuateur professionnel sont bienvenus \u00e0 joindre cette cat\u00e9gorie de membre.<\/p>\n<p>Jourdain Lee Gadoury<br \/>\nBenjamin John Gilbank<br \/>\nMarcus Peter Kormann<br \/>\nMichael Ryan Lamont<br \/>\nAndy Tsz Chun Lau<br \/>\nKim E Passmore<br \/>\nvalentina Tchekhonadskaia<br \/>\nKevin M villeneuve<br \/>\nLesley Yule<br \/>\nCandice Lee-Angela<br \/>\n   Zimmerman<\/p>\n<p>accredited appraiser  Canadian institute<br \/>\nWe welcome and congratulate these individuals as fully accredited members of the<br \/>\nInstitute through the granting of their AACI designation.<br \/>\nAccueillons et f\u00e9licitons comme membres pleinement accr\u00e9dit\u00e9s de l\u2019Institut et leur<br \/>\naccordons avec fiert\u00e9 la d\u00e9signation AACI.<\/p>\n<p>ALbERtA<br \/>\nColleen M Andrews<br \/>\nSohaib Ahmed Ansari<br \/>\nBrett L Coley<br \/>\nLisa Ann Land<br \/>\nWilliam Jeff Thompson<\/p>\n<p>bRItISH COLuMbIA<br \/>\nRavinder S Aulakh<br \/>\nJoshua JE Kitsul <\/p>\n<p>aaCi<\/p>\n<p>ONtARIO<br \/>\nAndrew Chan<br \/>\nAnthony Cheng<br \/>\nBill Norman Deevy<br \/>\nDanny P Lau<br \/>\nDale R Mitchell<br \/>\nJason Otto<br \/>\nTobe J Otvos<br \/>\nDavid H Rober<br \/>\nRick A van Andel<br \/>\nStacey J Wilks<\/p>\n<p>QuEbEC<br \/>\nMartin Dion <\/p>\n<p>SASkAtCHEwAN<br \/>\nPamela Lory McCaffrey  <\/p>\n<p>CRa<\/p>\n<p>ALbERtA<br \/>\nDan Peter Gagnon<br \/>\nNathan Lehman<br \/>\nJacalyn Schultz<br \/>\nJohn P Simpson<\/p>\n<p>bRItISH COLuMbIA<br \/>\nAnita Zosia Brochocka<br \/>\nDiane M Langley<br \/>\nElaine Sela<\/p>\n<p>Canadian Residential appraiser<br \/>\nThese members are congratulated on the successful completion of the CrA<br \/>\ndesignation requirements.<br \/>\nNous f\u00e9licitons ces membres pour avoir compl\u00e9t\u00e9 avec succ\u00e8s le programme menant \u00e0 la<br \/>\nd\u00e9signation CRA.<\/p>\n<p>NOVA SCOtIA<br \/>\nJohn Patrick Nadin<\/p>\n<p>ONtARIO<br \/>\nJacqueline M Boland<br \/>\nElizabeth M Marshall<br \/>\nJames R Pocock<br \/>\nKaren D Pollock<br \/>\nLorenzo Presutti<br \/>\nChristine L Rousselle<br \/>\nLeo P St Jean<br \/>\nDennis vurinaris<\/p>\n<p>PRINCE EDwARD<br \/>\nISLAND<br \/>\nBlair K Arsenault<\/p>\n<p>SASkAtCHEwAN<br \/>\nCory J Borsa<\/p>\n<p>ALbERtA<br \/>\nGarett Robert Watson<\/p>\n<p>SASkAtCHEwAN<br \/>\nKatie Bartlett<br \/>\nJoanne Kydd<\/p>\n<p>bRItISH COLuMbIA<br \/>\nvincent O\u2019Dwyer<\/p>\n<p>MANItObA<br \/>\nMichael J Taylor<\/p>\n<p>NEwfOuNDLAND &#038;<br \/>\nLAbRADOR<br \/>\nTyler A Bennett<\/p>\n<p>ONtARIO<br \/>\nMandeep Singh Mann<br \/>\nFranco Mezzatesta<br \/>\nRobyn L vandenberg<\/p>\n<p>Canadian Property Valuation Volume 55 | book 2 | 2011 \u00c9valuation Immobili\u00e8re au Canada 39click here to return to table 0f contents<\/p>\n<p>Announcing<br \/>\nThe Homburg Institute Canada<br \/>\nand Homburg Academy Switzerland<\/p>\n<p>Dr. Richard Homburg, Executive Chairman of the Homburg Group of Companies, has unveiled plans for an<br \/>\ninnovative international educational institution in<br \/>\nthe field of Real Estate. There will be two institutions<br \/>\nlaunched simultaneously: The Homburg Academy<br \/>\nSwitzerland, based in Zurich, and the Homburg<br \/>\nInstitute Canada, based in Charlottetown, Prince<br \/>\nEdward Island.<\/p>\n<p>The Project Leader, Dr. Jarrod Wiener, said,<br \/>\n\u201cReal estate has become international, most visibly<br \/>\nin finance, but also in areas like sustainability that<br \/>\nare global by nature. Increasingly, there is growing<br \/>\ncooperation among national professional associa-<br \/>\ntions sharing industry practice, learning from each<br \/>\nother, and sometimes even working together on<br \/>\ncommon standards. Our international approach is<br \/>\nreflective of this growing trend.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The Homburg Academy Switzerland will offer<br \/>\nuniversity-level programs including the Bachelor of<br \/>\nReal Estate and a Master of Real Estate. Curriculum<br \/>\ndevelopment is supported by an International Aca-<br \/>\ndemic Advisory Board composed of academics in<br \/>\nNorth America and Europe, with expertise in diverse<br \/>\nfields, to promote both inter-disciplinary perspec-<\/p>\n<p>tives. The instructional faculty is also international,<br \/>\ndrawing on academics on both continents.<\/p>\n<p>The Master of Real Estate will include Executive<br \/>\nand Professional tracks. As to what is on offer to<br \/>\nmembers of the Appraisal Institute of Canada, Dr.<br \/>\nWiener said, \u201cThere are courses that are directly<br \/>\nrelevant in appraisal and valuation, as well as in<br \/>\nfinance and other cognate subjects. But, what we<br \/>\nfound through the Homburg Global Education<br \/>\nProject is that people who have specialist knowledge<br \/>\nin a particular subject also learn from their peers in<br \/>\nother industries. They may be working on the same<br \/>\nissues and problems, but approach things differently<br \/>\nbecause they bring different methods and perspec-<br \/>\ntives to the table. That inter-disciplinary approach is<br \/>\nvery enriching.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>All programs will be delivered through an \u2018eCam-<br \/>\npus Global\u2019 virtual learning environment, including<br \/>\nself-paced study and real-time video seminars. This<br \/>\nwill enable students across Canada and around the<br \/>\nworld to follow the programs online in a supported<br \/>\nlearning environment.<\/p>\n<p>For Canadians, the Homburg Institute Canada<br \/>\nwill host Summer Schools of the Homburg Academy,<br \/>\nbringing together leading academics and profes-<\/p>\n<p>\u201dWhile the geographical,<br \/>\nlegal, social and political<br \/>\nforces affecting property<br \/>\nvalue can change from <\/p>\n<p>region to region or country to<br \/>\ncountry, valuation principles,<br \/>\ntheory and methodology are<br \/>\nborderless. This program will<br \/>\npresent AIC members with an<br \/>\nopportunity to advance their <\/p>\n<p>core knowledge in courses<br \/>\nthat will be of interest to <\/p>\n<p>appraisers and valuers around<br \/>\nthe world. The Homburg <\/p>\n<p>program may be the stepping<br \/>\nstone and network for <\/p>\n<p>those AIC members who are<br \/>\ncontemplating international <\/p>\n<p>career opportunities.\u201d<br \/>\n\u2013 AIC President Grant Uba, AACI<\/p>\n<p> sionals for intensive short-courses.  \u201cPeople do not<br \/>\nhave to take an entire program,\u201d says Dr. Wiener.<br \/>\n\u201cWe stress flexibility, so a person can take only an<br \/>\nintensive Summer School to obtain the learning that<br \/>\nhe or she needs, or a person can combine that with<br \/>\nonline lectures and sit the exam for university credit.<br \/>\nIt is designed to accommodate individual needs.\u201d<br \/>\nStudents can also accumulate credits over time to<br \/>\napply to the degree programs at a later date. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cI\u2019m very pleased that this Masters level educational opportunity for<br \/>\nvaluation professionals first conceived in 2008  is now a reality for AIC <\/p>\n<p>members.  Increasing opportunities and providing paths to expand<br \/>\nour members\u2019 body of knowledge ultimately raises the profile of our <\/p>\n<p>profession, locally, nationally and internationally.\u201d<br \/>\n\u2013 AIC Past President, Paul Olscamp, AACI,  Fellow<\/p>\n<p>Canadian Property Valuation Volume 55 | book 2 | 2011 \u00c9valuation Immobili\u00e8re au Canada40 click here to return to table 0f contents<\/p>\n<p>Overview of the valuation problem <\/p>\n<p>This was a question asked in a civil litigation<br \/>\nmatter dealing with a significant home that was<br \/>\nimproved with a very good quality pool, cabana<br \/>\nand landscaping. The cost to install the swim-<br \/>\nming pool, landscaping and the cabana on the<br \/>\nproperty was approximately $118,000. The pool,<br \/>\nlandscaping and cabana were installed in 2003<br \/>\nand 2004 and were only 4-5 years old at the date<br \/>\nof the valuation. <\/p>\n<p>In traditional real estate appraising, items<br \/>\nsuch as pools, garages, etc. were supposed to be<br \/>\ndetermined by using a paired sales analysis. In<br \/>\nthis process, the valuer needs to find several sales<br \/>\nof the identical home to the one under appraisal,<br \/>\nwith the exception of the item to be valued. This <\/p>\n<p>method can be effective if identical homes can<br \/>\nbe found with at least one of them having the<br \/>\ntargeted physical characteristic. <\/p>\n<p>Since there are no identical sales of houses<br \/>\nselling in which a valuer can extract some<br \/>\ntype of contributory value for the item in<br \/>\nquestion (e.g., pool, garage, etc.), then they<br \/>\nwould default to the next best set of data. The<br \/>\nsecond set of data would be of sales that are<br \/>\nnot identical, but are similar to the property<br \/>\nunder appraisal. The valuer would then apply<br \/>\nan adjustment in dollars to these items such<br \/>\nas basement finishing, lot size in relation<br \/>\nto the subject property, etc. The difference<br \/>\nbetween the dollar adjustments of these items<br \/>\nand the sale prices of the comparables would <\/p>\n<p>be the contributory value of the item. This<br \/>\nprocess was repeated several times until there<br \/>\nwas a dollar difference between the sales that<br \/>\nwould show what a specific feature of a given<br \/>\nhouse would be. <\/p>\n<p>The problem with this secondary method is<br \/>\ndetermining how the valuer adjusts for differ-<br \/>\nences in lot size, basement finishing, etc., if there<br \/>\nare no identical sales to be able to extract these<br \/>\ndifferences from the market place. What really<br \/>\noccurred is that the valuer makes a \u2018judgement\u2019<br \/>\ndecision. Since these judgements are fraught<br \/>\nwith bias, it really has no place in proper valu-<br \/>\nation analysis. Unfortunately, this is a common<br \/>\nproblem when it comes to the valuation of real<br \/>\nestate. Real estate practitioners need to seek <\/p>\n<p>of a high-end swimming pool,<br \/>\n       cabana and landscaping<\/p>\n<p>The<br \/>\ncOntributOry value  <\/p>\n<p>><\/p>\n<p>by George canning, aaci, canning consultants inc., london, On<\/p>\n<p>Canadian Property Valuation Volume 55 | book 2 | 2011 \u00c9valuation Immobili\u00e8re au Canada 41click here to return to table 0f contents<\/p>\n<p>of a high-end swimming pool,<br \/>\n       cabana and landscaping<\/p>\n<p>cOntributOry value  <\/p>\n<p>out better vehicles to aid them in determining<br \/>\nanswers to complex real estate questions. <\/p>\n<p>Suggested solution <\/p>\n<p>One of the ways to analyze differences in real<br \/>\nestate data from the market place is through<br \/>\nRegression Analysis. Regression Analysis has<br \/>\nbeen in use for well over 100 years and is defined<br \/>\nas \u201cA statistical technique of finding a<br \/>\nstraight line between many data points.\u201d<br \/>\nOnce the straight line has been determined, one<br \/>\ncan make predictions about the behaviour of<br \/>\npeople reacting in the real estate market place.<br \/>\nThere are two types of Regression Analysis. First,<br \/>\nthere is a Univariate model where one dependent<br \/>\nvariable is matched with an independent vari-<br \/>\nable. An example of this is building size matched<br \/>\nagainst sale price. We want to know the relation-<br \/>\nship between these to variables. Second, there<br \/>\nis Multivariate where many variables are used in<br \/>\nthe model to aid in explaining price differences<br \/>\nin properties. It is the latter model that we are<br \/>\ndealing with in this article. <\/p>\n<p>With Multivariate Regression Analysis, a<br \/>\nlarge number of sales are put in a spreadsheet<br \/>\nwith all the variables that might influence price.<br \/>\nThus, each sale would have a selling price, area<br \/>\nof house, area of basement finishing, age, lot<br \/>\nsize, garage, pool, no pool, hot tub, no hot tub,<br \/>\ndate of sale, cabana, shed, quality of landscaping<br \/>\naround the pool area, pool age, location relative<br \/>\nto backing onto green space, etc. In this analysis,<br \/>\nthe sales ranged in sale price from $400,000 to<br \/>\n$1,000,000. <\/p>\n<p>In the case of the subject property, we need<br \/>\nsales that had a pool and sales without a pool.<br \/>\nThe same applies to the quality of the landscap-<br \/>\ning around the pool and the type of building by <\/p>\n<p>the pool. Regression Analysis requires a lot of<br \/>\ninformation because it is being asked to deter-<br \/>\nmine the differences between data (e.g., with or<br \/>\nwithout pools, landscaping, cabana\/shed, etc.). <\/p>\n<p>Unfortunately, Regression Analysis is<br \/>\nnot simply the process of putting data into a<br \/>\nspreadsheet and pressing a button. various<br \/>\nrelationships of the variables (e.g., house size, lot<br \/>\nsize, etc.) between the sale price of the houses<br \/>\nneed to be explored. The variables that do not<br \/>\nplay a large role in explaining the differences in<br \/>\nthe sale prices of the comparables are not used<br \/>\nin the final analysis. This could be said for some<br \/>\nof the variables considered. Since the valuer does<br \/>\nnot know what they are specifically, each variable<br \/>\nneeds to be examined on an individual basis. At<br \/>\nthis stage of the analysis, the valuer is trying to<br \/>\nget a good balance between the actual data and<br \/>\nthe various variables that help to explain differ-<br \/>\nences in price. <\/p>\n<p>When the data is finally at a stage whereby<br \/>\nthe regression analysis becomes meaningful,<br \/>\nthen a series of observations can be made. We<br \/>\ncan first examine relations between houses <\/p>\n<p>with pools and houses without. Since we use a<br \/>\ndummy variable (i.e., 1=house with pool and<br \/>\n0=house without a pool), we can graph these<br \/>\nsimple results to see if there is any difference<br \/>\nbetween these two groups of data. The following<br \/>\nis a graph showing a box plot between houses<br \/>\nwith pools and ones without. <\/p>\n<p>The box plot graph was invented by J. Tukey.<br \/>\nThe actual box is at the end of the first and third<br \/>\nquartile, with the median shown as the black<br \/>\ndot. The \u2018whiskers\u2019 are the T-lines of the data that<br \/>\nare extended 3\/2 times the inter-quartile range.<br \/>\nThe dots above that represent any outlying data<br \/>\npoints.<\/p>\n<p>This graph shows three sets of data sub-<br \/>\nclasses. The reason why we did this analysis was<br \/>\nto create a common data set within the main<br \/>\ndata sets of houses with and without pools that<br \/>\nclosely matched one another. On the left hand<br \/>\nside of the box plots is sale price expressed in<br \/>\nscientific notation. The 5e + 05 means 5 with 5<br \/>\nzeros or $500,000. The dotted blue lines are the<br \/>\nexpression of the box plot. The lines at the top<br \/>\nof the blue lines which are horizontal are called <\/p>\n<p>7e+05<\/p>\n<p>6e+05<\/p>\n<p>5e+05<\/p>\n<p>4e+05<\/p>\n<p>none Pool<\/p>\n<p>Sa<br \/>\nle <\/p>\n<p>Pr<br \/>\nice<\/p>\n<p>none Pool none Pool<\/p>\n<p>Sub-class 1 Sub-class 2 Sub-class 3<\/p>\n<p>><\/p>\n<p>Canadian Property Valuation Volume 55 | book 2 | 2011 \u00c9valuation Immobili\u00e8re au Canada42 click here to return to table 0f contents<\/p>\n<p>returned coefficient of swimming pools and<br \/>\nthe standard error. <\/p>\n<p>Data\tset\t=\tpools,\tName\tof\tFit\t=\tL371\tcases\tare\tmissing\tat\tleast\tone\tvalue.<br \/>\nDeleted\tcases\tare\t(8\t56\t74\t51\t3\t95\t68)<br \/>\nNormal Regression Kernel mean function = Identity<br \/>\nResponse = log[SP]<br \/>\nTerms = (ElapsdMths GarSF Hse_Age SiteSF QC NoFP IGPool Hse_Age 2\u0302 FBsmntSF HseSFHseSF 2\u0302 Pool_Age*IGPool)<br \/>\nCoefficient\tEstimates<br \/>\nLabel  estimate  Std. Error  t-value  p-value<br \/>\nConstant\t\t 12.8928\t\t 0.206721\t \t62.368\t \t0.0000<br \/>\nElapsdMths\t\t 0.00194094\t\t 0.000773972\t\t 2.508\t\t 0.0144<br \/>\nGarSF\t\t 0.000110537\t\t 0.000103024\t\t 1.073\t\t 0.2869<br \/>\nHse_Age\t\t -0.0124851\t\t 0.00399742\t \t-3.123\t\t 0.0026<br \/>\nSiteSF\t\t 6.393998E-6\t\t 3.308006E-6\t\t 1.933\t\t 0.0572<br \/>\nQC  0.0803828  0.0235853  3.408 0.0011<br \/>\nNoFP\t\t 0.0152797\t\t 0.0192264\t\t 0.795\t\t 0.4294<br \/>\nIGPool\t\t 0.0404361\t\t 0.0362773\t\t 1.115\t\t 0.2688<br \/>\nHse_Age 2\u0302  0.000291559  0.0000856595  3.404  0.0011<br \/>\nFBsmntSF\t\t 0.0000316127\t\t 0.0000214225\t\t 1.476\t\t 0.1445<br \/>\nHseSF\t\t -0.000196538\t\t 0.000105068\t\t -1.871\t\t 0.0655<br \/>\nHseSF 2\u0302\t\t 4.490878E-8\t\t 1.613675E-8\t\t 2.783\t\t 0.0069<br \/>\nPool_Age.IGPool\t\t -0.00148304\t\t 0.00198264\t\t -0.748\t\t 0.4569\t<\/p>\n<p>R Squared:  0.596208<br \/>\nSigma hat:  0.0923906<br \/>\nNumber of cases:  91<br \/>\nNumber of cases used:  84<br \/>\nDegrees\tof\tfreedom:\t\t 71\t<\/p>\n<p>Summary Analysis of variance Table<br \/>\nSource  df  SS  MS  F  p-value<br \/>\nRegression\t\t 12\t\t 0.894859\t\t 0.0745716\t\t 8.74\t\t 0.0000<br \/>\nResidual\t\t 71\t 0.606058\t\t 0.00853602<\/p>\n<p>backyards. Either the buyer wants them or not.<br \/>\nThere is no other message being sent by the<br \/>\nbuyer. Love them or leave them. <\/p>\n<p>Regression\tAnalysis\tproduces\ta\tcoefficient\tor<br \/>\nvalue for each of the variables that are deemed<br \/>\nto best explain price differentials. It also indicates<br \/>\nthe\tspread\tof\tthis\tcoefficient\tin\tterms\tof\tprice.<br \/>\nThis is known as the standard error. The reason<br \/>\nwhy\tthere\twould\tbe\ta\tspread\tin\tthe\tcoefficients\tis<br \/>\nthat there are always going to be some variances<br \/>\nin the data. In the data below, we see the<br \/>\nRegression Analysis results.<\/p>\n<p>Regression Analysis has an amazing ability<br \/>\nto spew forth a considerable amount of data<br \/>\nand analysis. We started by using 94 sales and,<br \/>\nin the end, analyzed only 84. Some of the sales<br \/>\nwere eliminated because they sat outside of the<br \/>\nnormal distribution of data. In other words, some<br \/>\nof the sales were not telling the valuer much <\/p>\n<p>0.04<br \/>\n0.035<\/p>\n<p>0.03<br \/>\n0.025<br \/>\n0.02<\/p>\n<p>0.015<br \/>\n0.01<\/p>\n<p>0.005<br \/>\n0<\/p>\n<p>Coefficient for pool<\/p>\n<p>Standard error<\/p>\n<p>Swimming Pool Coefficient and Standard Error<\/p>\n<p>\u2018whiskers\u2019\u201d and represent 1.5 times the inter-<br \/>\nquarantile figure of the data. The blue dots at the<br \/>\ntop are outlying sale prices <\/p>\n<p>In sub-class 1. you see a black dot in the<br \/>\nbox which is labelled no pools. This is the<br \/>\nmedian price of the homes. Beside that box is<br \/>\na smaller box of data with the pools. The black<br \/>\ndot is shown to be higher. You can see this more<br \/>\nclearly when you follow the blue line over to the<br \/>\nsale price indicator. This indicates that, for this<br \/>\nsub-class of data for houses with pools and ones<br \/>\nwithout, houses with pools tend to sell for a<br \/>\nhigher price. <\/p>\n<p>In sub-class 2, we see the same pattern.<br \/>\nHouses with a pool sold for a higher value then<br \/>\nones that did not have a pool. The only difference<br \/>\nbetween sub-class 2 and sub-class 1 is that the<br \/>\ndifference in terms of dollars is not as high. <\/p>\n<p>In sub-class 3, we see a very wide dispersion<br \/>\nbetween the median price of houses with pools<br \/>\nand ones without. <\/p>\n<p>This data is indicating volatility in the prices of<br \/>\nhouses with pools as opposed to without. If this<br \/>\nwere not so, we would see a more consistent price<br \/>\ndifferential between houses with pools and ones<br \/>\nwithout between all three sub-sets. The other<br \/>\nfactor is that one cannot extend the line of dots<br \/>\nover to the sale price indicator and determine the<br \/>\ndifference in price. This cannot be done because<br \/>\nhe differences in the median prices of homes with<br \/>\npools and without pools is also due to other factors<br \/>\nsuch as lot size, age, condition, etc. <\/p>\n<p>The box plots are good visual tools that tell<br \/>\nus there is a variance between houses with pools<br \/>\nand ones without. This is a good indicator that<br \/>\nsomething is going on between the data sets<br \/>\nwhen it comes to pools. To be more exacting,<br \/>\nonly Regression Analysis can tell us what the final<br \/>\neffect a pool has on price. <\/p>\n<p>Multivariate Regression Analysis can be<br \/>\ngraphed, but because the coefficients pro-<br \/>\nduced by the model are so small, it is best to<br \/>\ngraph the coefficient (answer) to the standard<br \/>\nerror (how much one missed by). The fol-<br \/>\nlowing is the relationship graph between the <\/p>\n<p>This\tgraph\tis\tof\tthe\treturned\tcoefficient<br \/>\nof houses with swimming pools against the<br \/>\nstandard error, or how much we missed by. We<br \/>\ncan see that the standard error is as large as the<br \/>\ncoefficient\tanswer.\tThis\tfurther\treiterates\tthat<br \/>\nthe real estate market is sending a strong mixed<br \/>\nsignal when it comes to swimming pools in <\/p>\n<p>Canadian Property Valuation Volume 55 | book 2 | 2011 \u00c9valuation Immobili\u00e8re au Canada 43click here to return to table 0f contents<\/p>\n<p>COEFFICIENT LOW ERROR HIGH ERROR<br \/>\n0.040 0.004 0.076<\/p>\n<p>about the data, so they were eliminated from the<br \/>\nset. They are called outliers. <\/p>\n<p>The model\u2019s performance was not as one<br \/>\nwould have hoped for. The reason is that there is<br \/>\ntoo much variability to be explained completely.<br \/>\nHowever, that is the nature of data analysis. We<br \/>\nfound that the model was sending mixed signals<br \/>\nin terms of the valuation of pools, in particular.<br \/>\nThis is not surprising given the fact that pools<br \/>\nare generally real estate improvements that<br \/>\nare shown to generate a considerable amount<br \/>\nof controversy by buyers. Basically, with pools,<br \/>\neither a buyer likes them or not. Many home-<br \/>\nowners that have pools tend to fill them in. Other<br \/>\nbuyers see pools as a good way to entertain<br \/>\nchildren from the ages of 5 to 15, for example. <\/p>\n<p>In houses in the $400,000-plus range, pools<br \/>\nmight be an expected item. In other words, the<br \/>\nbuyer purchasing a $500,000-$800,000 house<br \/>\nwould most likely expect either a pool, attractive<br \/>\nlandscaping or a site that backs onto a green<br \/>\nspace. Having all three items, for example, might <\/p>\n<p>interact with one another in a way that some of<br \/>\nthese attributes play a secondary role in explain-<br \/>\ning value. <\/p>\n<p>We can say that pools do contribute some-<br \/>\nthing to the value of a property according to<br \/>\nour data analysis. The attractive landscaping<br \/>\nand building that seem to go with a pool do<br \/>\nbolster value a bit. It would appear that land-<br \/>\nscaping and any pool building are integrated<br \/>\nin with the pool in the eyes of the buyer. It<br \/>\nseems to be the case that, if one was going<br \/>\nto install a pool, it is best to have a pool with<br \/>\nsome added extra features, as opposed to a<br \/>\nvery plain pool. The time of year the property<br \/>\nwas sold with a pool was not a factor in terms<br \/>\nof added value. It did not make a difference in<br \/>\nterms of price. <\/p>\n<p>The contributory value of a pool as taken from<br \/>\nthe Regression Analysis shows the following. <\/p>\n<p>The\tcoefficient\tof\t0.040\tcan\tbe\texpressed\tas\ta<br \/>\npercentage of 4.0%. Thus, the lowest percentage<br \/>\nwould\tbe\t0.4%\tor\ta\thigh\tof\t7.6%.\tThis\tmeans\tthat<br \/>\nthe value of the pool could have a value 0.4% x<br \/>\nthe\toverall\tvalue\tof\tthe\thouse\tor\t7.6%\tx\tthe\toverall<br \/>\nvalue of the house. <\/p>\n<p>Obviously, the overall value of the house is a<br \/>\nvery important component to the end value of the<br \/>\nswimming pool. If it was determined that the value<br \/>\nof the house without the pool was $800,000, for<br \/>\nexample, then all we would have to do is apply the<br \/>\ncoefficients\tto\tthat\tfigures.\tWhen\twe\tapply\tour<br \/>\npercentage values of the pool from the Regression<br \/>\nAnalysis, the contributory value of the swimming<br \/>\npool would be from a low of $3,200 to a high of<br \/>\n$61,000. That is a considerable spread and reflects<br \/>\nthe volatile nature of this particular real estate<br \/>\nasset. This is the same reading valuers have been<br \/>\nreceiving from buyers over the decades regarding<br \/>\nswimming pools. To reiterate, buyers either love<br \/>\nthem or not. The dollar value of the range of swim-<br \/>\nming pools by the Regression Analysis is telling us<br \/>\nthe same thing, except it is expressing the fickle<br \/>\nnature of pools in terms of dollars. <\/p>\n<p>In the case of the subject property, the<br \/>\namount of depreciation that is inherent in the<br \/>\nsubject pool was $118,000 (cost new) &#8211; $50,000<br \/>\n(determined value) =$68,000. $68,000\/$118,000<br \/>\n=\t57%.\tSince\tthe\tpool\twas\tfive\tyears\told\tat\tthe<br \/>\ntime\tof\tthe\tvaluation,\twe\tcould\teasily\tsay\tthat\t7%<br \/>\nof\tthe\t57%\tis\tthe\tresult\tof\tphysical\tdepreciation<br \/>\nand 50% for economic obsolescence. However,<br \/>\nthat is a matter of fine tuning. <\/p>\n<p>As of the writing of this article, the matter<br \/>\nis not settled. It is the age old argument when<br \/>\nit comes to residential housing, in that most<br \/>\nhomeowners feel that, whenever large capital<br \/>\nimprovements are made to the house, the return<br \/>\nis going to yield a 100% on the dollar of cost<br \/>\nwhen the property is sold. This means that the<br \/>\nother side needs to validate their position and<br \/>\nbring to the table hard evidence to support their<br \/>\nposition that a swimming pool adds significantly<br \/>\nto the overall value of the property. The author<br \/>\nwishes them the best of luck with their task.  <\/p>\n<p>Canadian Property Valuation Volume 55 | book 2 | 2011 \u00c9valuation Immobili\u00e8re au Canada44 click here to return to table 0f contents<\/p>\n<p>News<\/p>\n<p>Solidifi Next Generation Scholarship \u2013 Seneca College<br \/>\nSolidifi awards this annual scholarship in the amount of $1000 to an active AIC member in good<br \/>\nstanding with the highest grade in\u00a0RPA 306\/AIC 400 over one academic year.  This year\u2019s recipi-<br \/>\nent is Robyn Vandenberg, AIC Student Member<\/p>\n<p>RECOgNIzINg ExCELLENCE<br \/>\nAppraisal Institute of Canada Award \u2013 Seneca College<br \/>\nAn annual award in the amount of $500 is presented to a graduating student in the Real<br \/>\nProperty Administration Program (RPA), who has, in the opinion of a Seneca faculty<br \/>\npanel, demonstrated academic excellence in RPA 112 and one or more of the additional<br \/>\nAIC curriculum courses at the College, demonstrated an active interest in the field of real<br \/>\nproperty as a career, and made valuable contributions to the classroom environment. The<br \/>\n2011 award winner is Ian McNeil.<\/p>\n<p>Ian McNeil (L) receives his award from<br \/>\nAIC Director, Dan Brewer, AACI.<\/p>\n<p>Robyn vandenberg receives her award from<br \/>\nSolidifi Executive vice President, John W. Schipper.<\/p>\n<p>IN MEMORIAM<\/p>\n<p>The following members of the Appraisal<br \/>\nInstitute of Canada have passed away. On<br \/>\nbehalf of everyone connected with the<br \/>\nInstitute and the profession, we extend<br \/>\nour sincerest sympathies to their families,<br \/>\nfriends and associates.\/ Les membres<br \/>\nsuivant de l\u2019Institut canadien des \u00e9valuateurs<br \/>\nsont d\u00e9c\u00e9d\u00e9s. Au nom de tous ceux qui<br \/>\noeuvrent de pr\u00e8s ou de loin au sein de<br \/>\nl\u2019Institut et de la profession, nous exprimons<br \/>\nnos plus sinc\u00e8res condol\u00e9ances \u00e0 les familles,<br \/>\namis et associ\u00e9s.<\/p>\n<p>Paul beckwith, AACI \u2013 victoria, BC<br \/>\nwilliam Carroll, AACI \u2013 Calgary, AB<br \/>\nLeroy Coulthard, AACI \u2013 London, ON<br \/>\nRobert Dunn, CRA \u2013 Winnipeg, MB<br \/>\nPaul Piche, AACI \u2013 Kapuskasing, ON<br \/>\nNam k. tran, CRA \u2013 vancouver, BC<\/p>\n<p>SOLIDIFI LAUNCHES APPRAISER-DRIVEN CHARITy<br \/>\nSolidifi has launched the Buck At A Time charitable program at Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital in Ontario. Through the program, members<br \/>\nof Solidifi\u2019s appraiser network can donate one dollar to charity from their appraisal fee. Buck At A Time donations will fund local programs and research at<br \/>\nHolland Bloorview and expand to include other children\u2019s rehabilitation centres across Canada. <\/p>\n<p>According to Solidifi President and CEO, Jason Smith, Buck At A Time\u2019s appraiser-driven focus separates it from other industry charity programs. \u201cAt<br \/>\nits core, Buck At A Time is about unlocking the power of our 3,000-strong Canadian appraiser network,\u201d he says. \u201cImagine the difference they can make<br \/>\nsimply by donating a dollar or more from each appraisal transaction to benefit the communities in which they live and work. I am thrilled that Solidifi is not<br \/>\nonly able to strengthen the relationships our appraiser partners have with their communities, but also to launch the first program of its kind in the industry.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Smith\tinitiated\tBuck\tAt\tA\tTime\tin\tresponse\tto\ta\tlife\tchanging\tevent.\tIn\t2007,\this\tsix-year-old\tson\tnearly\tlost\this\tlife\tbattling\tbacterial\tmeningitis.\tThrough<br \/>\nHolland Bloorview\u2019s rehabilitation programs and services, his son made a complete recovery. As a result, Smith and his family are committed to supporting<br \/>\nthe work of children\u2019s rehabilitation centres. Smith expects 90% of annual donations to fund local children\u2019s rehabilitation hospitals in the form of mobility<br \/>\ndevices, therapy, respite care, home improvements and support for families; 10% of annual donations will fund research of childhood disability at Holland<br \/>\nBloorview, which positively impacts children with disabilities globally. <\/p>\n<p>Michael Kal, President, Cornerstone Property Appraisals and Consulting, was one of the first appraisers to enroll in the program. \u201cI am proud to be<br \/>\nassociated with Buck At A Time,\u201d he says. \u201cOn behalf of all appraisers in Ontario, I truly appreciate the opportunity to make a difference in the community.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>Canadian Property Valuation Volume 55 | book 2 | 2011 \u00c9valuation Immobili\u00e8re au Canada 45click here to return to table 0f contents<\/p>\n<p>  CRITICAL DATES <\/p>\n<p>Mid-August 2011 \u2013  Membership dues<br \/>\nlink to e-invoices emailed to members<br \/>\nby AIC. For further information, contact<br \/>\nrosmarieb@aicanada.ca<br \/>\nSeptember 30, 2011 \u2013 Deadline for<br \/>\nposting\/recording the Candidate Course per<br \/>\nYear for 2011 CPY period (October 1, 2010 to<br \/>\nSeptember 30. 2011). For further informa-<br \/>\ntion, contact dianea@aicanada.ca<br \/>\nMid-November 2011 \u2013 Insurance<br \/>\ne-invoices emailed to members. For further<br \/>\ninformation, contact dianea@aicanada.ca<\/p>\n<p>RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION<br \/>\nPERFORMANCE gUIDE<\/p>\n<p>It remains true that appraisers are not home inspectors; however, the suite<br \/>\nof residential appraisal services does include the provision of progress<br \/>\ninspections, final inspections as part of a complete residential valuation,<br \/>\nand, of course, valuations sometime after completion of new construction.<br \/>\nAppraisers also become involved in litigation as expert witnesses to opine<br \/>\non the impact on value of a residential property that is not built to code or<br \/>\nsuffers from defects in construction. The home warranty insurance industry<br \/>\nin British Columbia has recently published a Residential Construction<br \/>\nPerformance Guide that may be helpful to any appraiser considering<br \/>\nsuch assignments. The guide should help an appraiser be able to better<br \/>\nunderstand a home inspection report, and, during the appraisal inspection,<br \/>\nbe better able to recognize what might be a defect, when recommending<br \/>\na more detailed professional inspection by an engineer or home inspector.<br \/>\nThe guide can be found at:<\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/www.hpo.bc.ca\/files\/download\/Res_Guide\/Residential_<br \/>\nConstruction_Performance_Guide.pdf<\/p>\n<p>News<\/p>\n<p>Canada\u2019s most recent census began in May 2011. Early in May,<br \/>\nyellow census packages were delivered to every dwelling in<br \/>\nCanada, providing residents the information they need to<br \/>\ncomplete the census online or on paper. Census information is<br \/>\nimportant for all communities and is vital for planning services<br \/>\nsuch as schools, daycare, police services and fire protection.<\/p>\n<p>The 2006 Census provides this portrait of Canada:<br \/>\n\u2022\t\t In\t2006,\tthere\twere\t31,612,897\tpeople\tin\tCanada,\t<\/p>\n<p>compared\tto\t30,007,094\tin\t2001<br \/>\n\u2022\t\t Every\tperson,\tyoung\tand\told,\tmust\tbe\tincluded\tin\tthe\t<\/p>\n<p>2011 Census. It\u2019s important that all residents are part<br \/>\nof Canada\u2019s family portrait.<\/p>\n<p>For more information about the 2011 Census, visit<br \/>\nwww.census2011.gc.ca.<\/p>\n<p>THE 2011 CENSUS <\/p>\n<p>mailto:rosmarieb@aicanada.ca<br \/>\nmailto:dianea@aicanada.ca<br \/>\nmailto:dianea@aicanada.ca<br \/>\nhttp:\/\/www.census2011.gc.ca<br \/>\nhttp:\/\/www.hpo.bc.ca\/files\/download\/Res_Guide\/Residential_Construction_Performance_Guide.pdf<\/p>\n<p>Canadian Property Valuation Volume 55 | book 2 | 2011 \u00c9valuation Immobili\u00e8re au Canada46 click here to return to table 0f contents<\/p>\n<p>Calendar of Events<\/p>\n<p>AIC 2011 Annual AIC Conference<br \/>\nChanging Tides, Brighter Horizons<br \/>\nJune 8-11, 2011<br \/>\nDelta Beaus\u00e9jour, Moncton, New Brunswick<br \/>\nAnnual General Meeting<br \/>\nFriday, June 10, 2011 \u2013 3:15 pm \u2013 Moncton, New Brunswick<br \/>\nFor information contact info@aicanada.ca<br \/>\nor http:\/\/aic2011.aicanada.ca or 1-888-551-5521<\/p>\n<p>bC Professional Practice Seminars<br \/>\nSeptember 29 &#038; 30 \u2013 Kelowna<br \/>\nOctober 28 &#038; 29 \u2013 vancouver<br \/>\nProvincial Conference<br \/>\nSeptember 30 &#038; October 1<br \/>\nDelta Grand Okanagan Resort, Kelowna<br \/>\nFor information contact info@appraisal.bc.ca<br \/>\nor  (604) 284-5515 or check www.appraisal.bc.ca<\/p>\n<p>Ab Professional Practice Seminars &#8211; Spring 2011<br \/>\nMay\t6-7,\t2011\t\u2013\tEdmonton<br \/>\nMay\t27-28,\t2011\t\u2013\tCalgary<br \/>\nRegistration forms are available in the \u2018Events\u2019 section of our website.<br \/>\nFor information contact AB AIC at aic.alberta @shawlink.ca or<br \/>\n(403)\t207-7892\tor\tcheck\thttp:\/\/alberta.aicanada.ca<\/p>\n<p>Sk fall Professional Development Conference<br \/>\nOctober 14, 2011 \u2013 Regina<br \/>\nFor information contact Marilyn Steranka at skaic@sasktel.net or<br \/>\n(306) 352-4195 or check http:\/\/saskatchewan.aicanada.ca<\/p>\n<p>Mb For information contact Kelly Tole at mbaic@mts.net<br \/>\nor\t(204)\t736-2427\tor\tcheck\thttp:\/\/manitoba.aicanada.ca<\/p>\n<p>*If you are viewing an electronic version of this issue on the AIC web site, please click on these listings for active links to the advertisers\u2019 web sites.<\/p>\n<p>Advertiser Information Centre<\/p>\n<p>Company    Page         website Phone Number<br \/>\nACI 2, 3, 48 www.appraiserchoice.com\t 800-234-8727<br \/>\nAltus\tGroup\tLtd.\t 47\t www.altusgroup.com 416-221-1200<br \/>\nAtlantic Realty Advisors 23 www.ara.ca<br \/>\nBradford Technologies 4 www.bradfordsoftware.com\t 800-622-8727<br \/>\nCanadian Association of Accredited Mortgage Professionals 19 www.caamp.org 416-385-2333<br \/>\nCanadian Resource valuation Group 29 www.crvg.com\t 780-424-8856<br \/>\nNotarius 26 www.notarius.com\t 800-567-6703<br \/>\nSauder\tSchool\tof\tBusiness\t 37\t www.realestate.ubc.ca\t 877-775-7733<br \/>\nSolidifi 14 www.solidifi.com 866-583-3983<\/p>\n<p>Please<br \/>\nsupport  <\/p>\n<p>our<br \/>\nadvertisers<\/p>\n<p>ON 2011 Professional Practice Seminars<br \/>\nMay 13 &#038; 14 &#8211; 9:00 am &#8211; 5:00 pm \u2013 Ottawa<br \/>\nJune\t17\t&#038;\t18\t&#8211;\t9:00\tam\t&#8211;\t5:00\tpm\t\u2013\tNiagara\tFalls<br \/>\nOctober 14 &#038; 15 &#8211; 9:00 am &#8211; 5:00 pm \u2013 Toronto<br \/>\nOctober 21 &#038; 22 &#8211; 9:00 am &#8211; 5:00 pm \u2013 Windsor<br \/>\nFor information or to register please log onto www.aicanada.ca under<br \/>\nProvincial Site Click Ontario &#8211; Events. Or contact Lorraine Azzopardi at<br \/>\nlorraine@oaaic.on.ca (416) 695-9333 Ext 222<\/p>\n<p>QC For information contact Ginette St-Jean at aqice@qc.aira.com or<br \/>\n(450)\t454-0377\tor\t1-877-454-0377\tor\tcheck<br \/>\nhttp:\/\/quebec.aicanada.ca<\/p>\n<p>Nb For information contact Rachel Dunleavy at nbarea@nb.aibn.com or<br \/>\ncheck www.nbarea.org<\/p>\n<p>NS For information contact Davida Mackay at nsreaa@nsappraisal.ns.ca<br \/>\nor\t(902)\t422-4077\tor\tcheck\twww.nsappraisal.ns.ca\/<\/p>\n<p>PEI For information contact Suzanne Pater at peiaic@xplornet.com or<br \/>\n(902) 368-3355 or check http:\/\/pe.aicanada.ca<\/p>\n<p>NL For information contact Susan Chipman at naaic@nf.aibn.com or<br \/>\n(709)\t753-7644\tor\tcheck\thttp:\/\/newfoundland.aicanada.ca<\/p>\n<p>We\u2019ve moved\u2026..<br \/>\nAppraisal Institute of Canada \u2013 British Columbia<br \/>\n#210 &#8211; 10451 Shellbridge Way, Richmond, BC v6X 2W8<br \/>\nNew phone: (604) 284-5515     New fax: (604) 284-5514<br \/>\nwww.appraisal.bc.ca<\/p>\n<p>www.aicanada.ca<br \/>\nViSit uS at:<\/p>\n<p>mailto:info@aicanada.ca<br \/>\nhttp:\/\/aic2011.aicanada.ca<br \/>\nmailto:info@appraisal.bc.ca<br \/>\nhttp:\/\/www.appraisal.bc.ca<br \/>\nmailto:@shawlink.ca<br \/>\nhttp:\/\/alberta.aicanada.ca<br \/>\nmailto:skaic@sasktel.net<br \/>\nhttp:\/\/saskatchewan.aicanada.ca<br \/>\nmailto:mbaic@mts.net<br \/>\nhttp:\/\/manitoba.aicanada.ca<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"fPd69TvK2w\"><p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.aicanada.ca\/\">Home<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" class=\"oembed-iframe\"  class=\"wp-embedded-content\" sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" style=\"position: absolute; clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);\" title=\"&#8220;Home&#8221; &#8212; Appraisal Institute of Canada\" src=\"https:\/\/www.aicanada.ca\/embed\/#?secret=gIkeg4VH7f#?secret=fPd69TvK2w\" data-secret=\"fPd69TvK2w\" width=\"500\" height=\"282\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"fPd69TvK2w\"><p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.aicanada.ca\/\">Home<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" class=\"oembed-iframe\"  class=\"wp-embedded-content\" sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" style=\"position: absolute; clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);\" title=\"&#8220;Home&#8221; &#8212; Appraisal Institute of Canada\" src=\"https:\/\/www.aicanada.ca\/embed\/#?secret=gIkeg4VH7f#?secret=fPd69TvK2w\" data-secret=\"fPd69TvK2w\" width=\"500\" height=\"282\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\"><\/iframe><br \/>\nmailto:lorraine@oaaic.on.ca<br \/>\nmailto:aqice@qc.aira.com<br \/>\nhttp:\/\/quebec.aicanada.ca<br \/>\nmailto:nbarea@nb.aibn.com<br \/>\nhttp:\/\/www.nbarea.org<br \/>\nmailto:nsreaa@nsappraisal.ns.ca<br \/>\nhttp:\/\/www.nsappraisal.ns.ca\/<br \/>\nmailto:peiaic@xplornet.com<br \/>\nhttp:\/\/pe.aicanada.ca<br \/>\nmailto:naaic@nf.aibn.com<br \/>\nhttp:\/\/newfoundland.aicanada.ca<br \/>\nhttp:\/\/www.appraisal.bc.ca<br \/>\nhttp:\/\/www.appraiserchoice.com<br \/>\nhttp:\/\/www.altusgroup.com<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"9VPQr6oB4r\"><p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ara.ca\/\">Home<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" class=\"oembed-iframe\"  class=\"wp-embedded-content\" sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" style=\"position: absolute; clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);\" title=\"&#8220;Home&#8221; &#8212; ARA - Atlantic Realty Advisors\" src=\"http:\/\/www.ara.ca\/embed\/#?secret=thLuHKG47Z#?secret=9VPQr6oB4r\" data-secret=\"9VPQr6oB4r\" width=\"500\" height=\"282\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\"><\/iframe><br \/>\nhttp:\/\/www.bradfordsoftware.com<br \/>\nhttp:\/\/www.caamp.org<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"PR8IxTGvzT\"><p><a href=\"https:\/\/crvg.com\/\">CRVG Home<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" class=\"oembed-iframe\"  class=\"wp-embedded-content\" sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" style=\"position: absolute; clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);\" title=\"&#8220;CRVG Home&#8221; &#8212; CRVG - Canadian Resource Valuation Group\" src=\"https:\/\/crvg.com\/embed\/#?secret=CrTu00G7he#?secret=PR8IxTGvzT\" data-secret=\"PR8IxTGvzT\" width=\"500\" height=\"282\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\"><\/iframe><br \/>\nhttp:\/\/www.notarius.com<br \/>\nhttp:\/\/www.realestate.ubc.ca<br \/>\nhttp:\/\/www.solidifi.com<\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/www.altusgroup.com<\/p>\n<p>ACI and its products are trademarks or registered trademarks of ACI. | Copyright \u00a9 2011 ACI | Other brand and product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners.<\/p>\n<p>ACISketch\u2122 is newly enhanced to include features<br \/>\nappraisers asked for. Create professional fl oorplans<br \/>\nin minutes using ACISketch\u2019s dynamic tools. <\/p>\n<p>Use your mouse or keyboard to quickly draw a<br \/>\nfl oorplan and automatically calculate the total<br \/>\narea and perimeter of the property. <\/p>\n<p>Sketches import directly into appraisal reports<br \/>\nand measurements automatically populate the<br \/>\nforms. It\u2019s just that easy!<\/p>\n<p>* Payable in US dollars.<\/p>\n<p>now<br \/>\nonly<\/p>\n<p>*<\/p>\n<p>Trace scanned fl oor plans with Photometrics.<\/p>\n<p>Photometrics<\/p>\n<p>Auto-close your sketch using the F9 key.<\/p>\n<p>Complete Area Tool<\/p>\n<p>Unit of Measure<br \/>\nSwitch between standard feet or<br \/>\ninches and standard decimal or<br \/>\nmetric units, quickly and easily<\/p>\n<p>CRAL2010\u2122 Users<br \/>\nNeed a new angle on sketching?<\/p>\n<p>49$<br \/>\nIncludes CRAL Integration<\/p>\n<p>AppraisersChoice.com | 800-234-8727<\/p>\n<p>Call ACI Sales Today!<br \/>\n.<\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/www.appraiserchoice.com<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":14354,"menu_order":14,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_relevanssi_hide_post":"","_relevanssi_hide_content":"","_relevanssi_pin_for_all":"","_relevanssi_pin_keywords":"","_relevanssi_unpin_keywords":"","_relevanssi_related_keywords":"","_relevanssi_related_include_ids":"","_relevanssi_related_exclude_ids":"","_relevanssi_related_no_append":"","_relevanssi_related_not_related":"","_relevanssi_related_posts":"","_relevanssi_noindex_reason":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"no","_lmt_disable":""},"class_list":["post-30009","issue","type-issue","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aicanada.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/issue\/30009","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aicanada.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/issue"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aicanada.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/issue"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aicanada.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/14354"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aicanada.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30009"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}